Profile
International Journal of Nursing & Clinical Practices Volume 7 (2020), Article ID 7:IJNCP-317, 11 pages
https://doi.org/10.15344/2394-4978/2020/317
Systematic Reviews
Nurses' Perspective of Patient Advocacy: A Systematic Mixed Studies Review

Usama Saleh1,*, Ahmad Aboshayga2, Tom O’Conner3, Moath Saleh4, Declan Patton5 and Ailyn May G. ampang6

1Professor and Department Chair of Nursing, The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, Chicago, IL 60654, USA
2Chairperson, Saudi Board of Nursing, Saudi Council for Health Specialties, Dean of School of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
3Deputy Head of Department, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
4Head of Training Organization and Regulation Department, King Abdullah Medical City, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
5Director and Senior Lecturer, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
6Education Coordinator, Postgraduate Administration of Nursing and Allied Health Training, King Abdullah Medical City, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
Prof. Usama Saleh, Professor and Department Chair of Nursing, The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, 325 N Wells St., Chicago, IL 60654, USA, Tel: 001-859-402-1616; E-mail: U_saleh@yahoo.com
17 December 2019; 07 January 2020; 09 January 2020
Saleh U, Aboshayga A, O’Conner T, Saleh M, Patton D, et al (2020) Nurses’ Perspective of Patient Advocacy: A Systematic Mixed Studies Review. Int J Nurs Clin Pract 7: 317. doi: https://doi.org/10.15344/2394-4978/2020/317

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this review is to report on nurses’ attitude and perception toward patient advocacy.
Design: Systematic reviews.
Data Source: We searched for evidence regarding nurses’ attitude, perceptions, feelings, thoughts, or behaviors toward patient advocacy in three databases: CINHAL, MEDLINE, and OVID.
Review Methods: The inclusion criteria were studies on nurses’ attitude, perception, feelings, thoughts, and behaviors toward patient advocacy published in academic journals in English language. Qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-method research studies were included. The Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) as a quality assessment tool was used as a framework to review the quality of the full-text articles. Each article was awarded a value score out of 20.
Results: A total of 21 studies were eligible, of the 998 studies retrieved from selected databases. The review resulted in two findings: (1) nurses consistently have positive attitude toward patient advocacy, and (2) the patient advocacy process includes four elements: (1) the client situation, (2) the nurse, (3) advocacy interventions, and (4) the advocacy consequences.
Conclusion: Preparing professional nurses for the advocacy role is essential part of quality nursing care.
Impact: Patient advocacy is a complex concept and there has been inconsistencies on the use of this concept in the literature. Patient advocacy should be defined as a process with four elements: the patient situation, the nurse, and advocacy action, and the advocacy consequences. Al nurses in different areas of nursing practice can utilize the findings of this study to improve patient care outcome.