Profile

New User

New to Graphy Publications? Create an account to get started today.

Registered Users

Have an account? Sign in now.

How to Cite | Author Information | Publication History
International Journal of Nursing & Clinical Practices Volume 5 (2018), Article ID 5:IJNCP-290, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.15344/2394-4978/2018/290
Research Article
Effectiveness of an Adaptive Quizzing System as a Self-Regulated Study Tool to Improve Nursing Students' Learning

E’loria Simon-Campbell1 and Julia C. Phelan2*

1School of Nursing, Sam Houston State University, TX, USA
2Graduate School of Education and Information Studies, University of California, CA, USA
Dr. Julia C. Phelan, Lead Research Scientist - K-16 Assessment Development, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), Graduate School of Education and Information Studies, University of California, California, USA; E-mail: julia.phelan@ucla.edu
13 June 2018; 16 August 2018; 18 August 2018
Simon-Campbell E, Phelan JC (2018) Effectiveness of an Adaptive Quizzing System as a Self-Regulated Study Tool to Improve Nursing Students’ Learning. Int J Nurs Clin Pract 5: 290. doi: https://doi.org/10.15344/2394-4978/2018/290
© 2018 Simon-Campbell et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

References

  1. Holstein BL, Zangrilli BF, Taboas P (2006) Standardized testing tools to support quality educational outcomes. Qual Manag Health Care 15: 300- 308 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Frith KH, Sewell JP, Clark DJ (2005) Best Practices in NCLEX-RN Readiness Preparation for Baccalaureate Student Success. Comput Inform Nursa 23: 322-329 [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Test Plans [View]
  4. Crow CS, Handley M, Morrison RS, Shelton MM (2004) Requirements and interventions used by BSN programs to promote and predict NCLEX-RN success: a national study. J Prof Nurs 20: 174-186 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Seldomridge LA, DiBartolo MC (2004) Can success and failure be predicted for baccalaureate graduates on the computerized NCLEX-RN. J Prof Nurs 20: 361-368 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Eich M, O’Neill T (2007) NCLEX Delay Pass Rate Study. NCLEX Psychometric Research Brief [View]
  7. Cox-Davenport R, Phelan J (2015) Laying the groundwork for NCLEX Success: An exploration of adaptive quizzing as an examination preparation method. Comput Inform Nurs 33: 208-215 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Pennington T, Spurlock D (2010) A systematic review of the effectiveness of remediation interventions to improve NCLEX-RN pass rates? J Nurs Educ 49: 485-492 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Morrison S, Free KW, Newman M (2002) Do remediation policies improve NCLEX-RN pass rates? Nurse Educ 27: 94-96 [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. National League for Nursing Board of Governors (2012) The Fair Testing Imperative in Nursing Education: A Living Document from the National League for Nursing. New York, NY [View]
  11. Spurlock DR, Hunt LA (2008) A study of the usefulness of the HESI Exit Exam in predicting NCLEX-RN failure. J Nurs Educ 47: 157-166 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Eddy LL, Epeneter BJ (2002) The NCLEX-RN Experience: Qualitative Interviews With Graduate of a Baccalaureate Nursing Program. J Nurs Educ 41: 273-278 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Taylor H, Loffin C, Reyes H (2014) First-Time NCLEX-RN Pass Rate: Measure of Program Quality or Something Else? Journal of Nursing Education 53: 336-341 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Bloom BS (1968) Learning for mastery. Evaluation Comment (UCLACSIEP) 1: 1-12
  15. Bloom BS, Englehart MD, Furst EJ, Hill WH, Krathwohl DR, et al. (1956) The Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Co, Inc
  16. Simon-Campbell E, Phelan J (2016) Effectiveness of an adaptive quizzing system as an institutional-wide strategy to improve student learning and retention. Nurse educ 41: 246-251 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Kulik CL, Kulik JA, Bangert-Drowns RL (1990) Effectiveness of mastery learning programs: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 60: 265-299 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Roediger HL, Karpicke JD (2006) Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychol Sci 17: 249-255 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Roediger HL, Butler AC (2011) The critical role of retrieval practice in longterm retention. Trends Cogn Sci 15: 20-27 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. Carrier LM (2003) College students' choices of study strategies. Perceptual and Motor skills 96: 54-56 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Callender AA, McDaniel MA (2009) The limited benefits of rereading educational texts. Contemporary Educational Psychology 34: 30-41 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Karpicke JD, Butler AC, Roediger HL (2009) Metacognitive strategies in student learning: do students practise retrieval when they study on their own? Memory 17: 471-479 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Karpicke JD, Roediger HL (2010) Is expanding retrieval a superior method for learning text materials? Memory & cognition 38: 116-124 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Belluck P (2011) To really learn, quit studying and take a test. New York Times [Google Scholar]
  25. McDaniel MA, Callender AA (2008) Cognition, memory, and education. In HL Roediger (Ed), Cognitive psychology of memory, Learning and Memory: A comprehensive reference. Oxford, UK: Elsevier [View]
  26. Kornell N, Bjork RA (2007) The promise and perils of self-regulated study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14: 219-224 [Google Scholar]
  27. Wolters Kluwer
  28. Beilock S (2010) Choke: What the secrets of the brain reveal about getting it right when you have to [Google Scholar]
  29. Dudas K (2011) Strategies to improve NCLEX® style testing in students who speak English as an additional language. The Online Journal of Cultural Competence in Nursing and Healthcare 1: 14-23 [View]
  30. Koch J, Salamonson Y, Du HY, Andrew S, Frost SA, et al. (2011) Value of web-based learning activities for nursing students who speak English as a second language. Journal of Nursing Education 50: 373-380 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Koch J, Andrew S, Salamonson Y, Everett B, Davidson PM, et al. (2010) Nursing students’ perception of a web-based intervention to support learning. Nurse Educ Today 30: 584-590 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Pintrich PR, DeGroot E (1990) Quantitative and qualitative perspectives on student motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. In Annual Meeting
Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, Safari, Above IE 9.0 version
Privacy Policy | Copyright & Permissions
Copyright © 2013-2024 Graphy Publications, All Rights Reserved.