Profile

New User

New to Graphy Publications? Create an account to get started today.

Registered Users

Have an account? Sign in now.

How to Cite | Author Information | Publication History | Funding Information
International Journal of Nursing & Clinical Practices Volume 4 (2017), Article ID 4:IJNCP-235, 8 pages
https://doi.org/10.15344/2394-4978/2017/235
Review Article
Interpreting Nursing Metatheory through Complexity Integration Nursing Theory: A Scoping Review

Sharon L. Van Sell

Professor, The Houston J. and Florence A. Doswell College of Nursing, Texas Woman’s University, USA
Prof. Sharon L. Van Sell, The Houston J. and Florence A. Doswell College of Nursing, 5500 Southwestern Medical Avenue, #7209, Dallas, Texas, USA, 75235-7299, Tel: 1-864-275-3527, FAX: 214-689-6539; E-mail: svansell@twu.edu
27 January 2017; 16 April 2017; 18 April 2017
Van Sell SL (2017) Interpreting Nursing Metatheory through Complexity Integration Nursing Theory: A Scoping Review. Int J Nurs Clin Pract 4: 235. doi: https://doi.org/10.15344/2394-4978/2017/235
This article was published with support from Texas Woman's University Libraries’ Open Access Fund.
© 2017 Van Sell. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

References

  1. Clarke PN (2015) Meta-theory in nursing: Necessary for practice? Nurs Sci Q 28: 127-128 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Nursing theory (2012) Medical Dictionary for the Health Professions and Nursing, Farlex
  3. Im EO, Meleis AI (1999) Situation-Specific theories: Philosophical roots, properties, and approach. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 22: 11-24 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Colley C (2003) Nursing Theory: Its importance to practice. Nursing Standard 17: 33-37 [Google Scholar]
  5. Marañón AA, Pera MPI (2015) Theory and practice in the construction of professional identity in nursing students: A qualitative study. Nurse Educ Today 35: 859-863 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Gaynes R (2011) Germ Theory: Medical Pioneers in Infectious Diseases (1). Washington, DC: ASM Press. Accessed October 22, 2016, from ProQuest ebrary.Electronic reproduction. Palo Alto, Calif.: ebrary, 2011
  7. Nightingale, F (1820-1910) Notes on nursing: What it is, and what it is not. London: Harrison, 59, Pall Mall, Bookseller to the Queen, [1883] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lasiuk GC, Ferguson LM (2005) From Practice to Midrange Theory and Back Again: Beck’s Theory of Postpartum Depression. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 28: 127-136 [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. “Metatheory” (2016) In Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary [View]
  10. Walker LO, Avant KC (2011) Strategies for Theory Construction in Nursing. Boston, MA: Prentice Hall, an imprint of Pearson [Google Scholar]
  11. Powers BA, Knapp T (2010) In A. Powers, Dictionary of Nursing Theory and Research. New York: Springer Publishing Company [Google Scholar]
  12. Wallis S (2010) Toward a Science of Metatheory. Integral Review 6: 73- 120 [Google Scholar]
  13. Sitzman K, Eichelberger LW (2017) Understanding the work of nurse theorist: A creative beginning. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning [Google Scholar]
  14. Karnick PM (2014) A case for nursing theory in practice. Nurs Sci Q 27: 117 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Fawcett J (1984) The metaparadigm of nursing: Present status and future refinements. Image 16: 84-87 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fawcett J (1996) On the Requirements for a Metaparadigm: An Invitation to Dialogue. Nurs Sci Q 9: 94-97 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Arksey H, O’Malley L (2005) Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8: 19- 32 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien (2010) Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science 5: 69 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Joanna Briggs Institute (2015) Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual: Methodology for JBI Scoping Reviews. Adelaide, South Australia: The Joanna Briggs Institute
  20. Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O’Brien KK, Straus S, Tricco AC, et al. (2014) Scoping reviews: Time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J Clin Epidemiol 67: 1291-1294 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Cacchione PZ (2016) The Evolving Methodology of Scoping Reviews (editorial). Clin Nurs Res 25: 115-119 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Davis K, Drey N, Gould D (2009) What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies 46: 1386-1400 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kable AK, Pich J, Maslin-Prothero SE (2012) A structured approach to documenting a search strategy for publication: A 12 step guideline for authors. Nurse Educ Today 32: 878-886 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Khalil H, Pharm M, Pharm B, Peters M, Godfrey CM, et al. (2016) An evidence-based approach to scoping reviews. Worldviews on Evid Based Nurs 13: 118-123 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Peterson J, Pearce PF, Ferguson LA, Langford CA (2016) Understanding scoping reviews: Definition, purpose, and process. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract 5: 1-5 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Sarrami-Foroushani P, Travaglia J, Debono D, Clay-Williams R, Braithwaite J (2015) Scoping meta-review: Introducing a new methodology. Clin Transl Sci 8: 77-81 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Anderson S, Allen P, Peckham S, Goodwin N (2008) Asking the right questions: Scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organization and delivery of health services. Health Res Policy Syst 6: 7 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Fawcett J (2013) Thoughts about conceptual models, theories, and literature reviews. Nurs Scie Q 26: 285-288 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Moher D, Stewart L, Shekelle P (2015) All in the family: Systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews and more. Syst Rev 4: 183-184 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Straus SE, Kastner M, Soobiah C, Antony J, Tricco AC (2016) Introduction: Engaging researchers on developing, using, and improving knowledge synthesis methods: a series of articles describing the results of a scoping review on emerging knowledge synthesis methods. J Clin Epidemiology 73: 15-18 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  31. Tricco AC, Antony J, Soobiah C, Kastner M, Cogo E, et al. (2016) Knowledge synthesis methods for generating or refining theory: a scoping review reveals that little guidance is available. J Clin Epidemiol 73: 36-42 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien K, Colquhoun H, et al. (2016) A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology 16: 15 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Tricco AC, Soobiah C, Antony J, Cogo E, MacDonald H, et al. (2016) A scoping review identifies multiple emerging knowledge synthesis methods, but few studies operationalize the method. J Clin Epidemiol 73: 19-28 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Pham MT, Rajic A, Greig JD, Sargeant JM, Papadopoulos A, et al. (2014) A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods 5: 371-385 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Gough D, Thomas J, Oliver S (2012) Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Systematic Reviews 1: 28 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kastner M, Tricco AC, Soobiah C, Lillie E, Perrier L, et al. (2012) What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping review. BMC Medical Research Methodology 12: 114 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Rumrill PD, Fitzgerald SM, Merchant WR (2010) Using scoping literature reviews as a means of understanding and interpreting existing literature. Work 35: 399-404 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Clarke PN, Fawcett J (2013) Life as a Nurse Metatheorist. Nurs Sci Q 26: 238-240
  39. Barker P, Buchanan-Barker P (2007) The Tidal Model: Mental Health, Reclamation, and Recovery [View]
  40. Van Sell SL, Kalofissudis IA (2002) The Evolving Essence of the Science of Nursing: The Complexity Integration Nursing Theory. Chania, Crete Greece
  41. Paterson JG, Zderad LT (2008) Humanistic Nursing. Project Gutenberg eBook [View]
  42. Davidson A, Ray M, Turkel M (2011) Nursing, Caring, and Complexity Science: For Human Environment Well-Being. New York: Springer Publishers [Google Scholar]
  43. Burroughs J (2013) Understanding Nursing Through a Theoretical Model: Complexity, Synergy, and General Systems. Proceeding of the National Conference on Undergraduate Research (NCUR) 2013, University of Wisconsin, La Cross, WI [Google Scholar]
  44. Wilkins LE (2002) The Meta-Theory of Transcendence [View]
  45. Von Krogh G, Dale C, Naden D (2005) A framework for integrating NANDA, NIC, and NOC terminology in electronic patient records. J Nurs Scholarsh 37: 275-281 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Kim HS (2000) The Nature of Theoretical Thinking in Nursing. (2nd edition), New York: Springer [Google Scholar]
  47. Dickoff J, James P (1968) A theory of theories: A position paper. Nurs Res 17: 197-203 [Google Scholar]
  48. Dickoff J, James P, Wiedenbach E (1968) Theory in a practice discipline: Part I, Practice oriented theory. Nurs Res 17: 415-435 [Google Scholar]
  49. Dickoff J, James P, Wiedenbach E (1968) Theory in a practice discipline: Part II, Practice oriented research. Nursing Research 17: 545-554 [Google Scholar]
  50. Constantino RE, Crane PA (2013) Theoretical and conceptual frameworks and models for understanding forensic nursing. In Constantino RE, Crane PA, & Young SE (Eds) Forensic nursing: Evidence-based principles and practice. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company
  51. Badcock PB (2012) Evolutionary systems theory: A unifying meta-theory of psychological science. Review of General Psychology16: 10-23 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. Ploeger A, Hoort BV (2015) Evolutionary psychology as a metatheory for the social sciences: How to gather interdisciplinary evidence for a psychological adaptation. Review of General Psychology19: 381-392 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. Humanistic Nursing Theory (2017) The Free Dictionary
  54. Ray MA, Turkel MC (2012) A transtheoretical Evolution of Caring Science within Complex Systems. International Journal for Human Caring 16: 28- 39 [Google Scholar]
  55. Kineman JJ (2008) Fundamental of relational caring complexity. In: Allen J, Wilby J (eds) Proceedings of the 52nd annual meeting of the International Society for the System Sciences, Toronto, 2008
  56. Barker P (2001) The Tidal Model: Developing a Person-Centered Approach to Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. Perspect Psychiatr Care 37: 79- 87 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  57. McEwen M, Wills E (2011) Theoretical basis for nursing (1st ed.) Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
  58. Binner M, Ross D, Browner I (2011) Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Assessment of Oncology Nurses’ Knowledge and Practice. Oncol Nurs Forum 38: 448-454 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  59. Dossey BM (2008) Theory of integral nursing. Advances in Nursing Science 31: E52-73 [Google Scholar]
  60. Jarrin O (2012) The Integrality of Situated Caring in Nursing and the Environment. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 35: 14-24 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  61. Sredl D (1983) Airborne Patient Care Management: A Multidisciplinary Approach. St. Louis: Medical Research Associates Publications
  62. Sredl D (2008) Conceptual model: The aerohemodynamics metatheory. Teaching & Learning in Nursing 3: 115-120 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, Safari, Above IE 9.0 version
Privacy Policy | Copyright & Permissions
Copyright © 2013-2024 Graphy Publications, All Rights Reserved.