Profile

New User

New to Graphy Publications? Create an account to get started today.

Registered Users

Have an account? Sign in now.

How to Cite | Author Information | Publication History
International Journal of Nursing & Clinical Practices Volume 3 (2016), Article ID 3:IJNCP-196, 3 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.15344/2394-4978/2016/196
Commentary
How Good are We at Recognizing and Treating Pelvic Inflammatory Disease?

Heather May* and Joan McDowell

Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, 1345 Govan Rd, Glasgow, G51 4TF, United Kingdom
School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing, Nursing & Health Care, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
Heather May, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, 1345 Govan Rd, Glasgow, G51 4TF, United Kingdom, Tel: 07526751664; E-mail: Heather.may13@hotmail.co.uk
25 May 2016; 17 August 2016; 19 August 2016
May H, McDowell J (2016) How Good are We at Recognizing and Treating Pelvic In ammatory Disease? Int J Nurs Clin Pract 3: 196. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15344/2394-4978/2016/196
© 2016 May et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

References

  1. Mazza D (2010) Women’s Health in General Practice. Melbourne: Elsevier Health Sciences
  2. British Association of Sexual Health & HIV (2011) UK National Guidance for the Management of Pelvic In ammatory Disease [View]
  3. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2007) Faculty of Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare Clinical Guidance - Intrauterine Contraception [View]
  4. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2010) Information for you - Acute pelvic in ammatory disease: tests and treatment [View]
  5. National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (2013) Pelvic In ammatory Disease
  6. Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network (2015) SIGN Grading System [View]
  7. Doxanakis A, Hayes RD, Chen MY, Gurrin LC, Hocking J, et al. (2008) Missing pelvic in ammatory disease? Substantial differences in the rate at which doctors diagnose PID. Sex Transm Infect 84: 518-523 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Tepper N, Steenland M, Gaf eld M, Marchbanks P, Curtis KM (2013) Retention of intrauterine devices in women who acquire pelvic in ammatory disease: a systematic review. Contraception 87: 655-660 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Jacobs JA, Jones E, Gabella BA, Spring B, Brownson RC (2012) Tools for implementing an Evidence-Based Approach in Public Health Practice. Prev Chronic Dis 9: 110324 [View]
  10. Black K, Sakhaei T, Garland GA (2010) study investigating obstetricians and gynaecologists’ management of women requesting an intrauterine device. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 50: 184-188 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, Safari, Above IE 9.0 version
Privacy Policy | Copyright & Permissions
Copyright © 2013-2024 Graphy Publications, All Rights Reserved.