Profile
International Journal of Nursing & Clinical Practices Volume 2 (2015), Article ID 2:IJNCP-142, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.15344/2394-4978/2015/142
Research Article
Facilitating Community Participants' Research Engagement: Community Members' Perceptions of Community-based Research

Alice M. Tse1*, Donna-Marie Palakiko2, Ephrosine Daniggelis2 and Emily Makahi3

1School of Nursing and Dental Hygiene, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 2528 McCarthy Mall, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA
2Ke Ola Mamo, Native Hawaiian Health Care System, Oahu, 1505 Dillingham Blvd., Rm 205, Honolulu, HI 96817, USA
3The Salvation Army Women’s Way Family Treatment Center, 845 22nd Avenue Honolulu, HI 96816, USA
Dr. Alice M. Tse, School of Nursing and Dental Hygiene, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 2528 McCarthy Mall, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA; E-mail: atse@hawaii.edu
30 August 2015; 21 September 2015; 23 September 2015
Tse AM, Palakiko DM, Daniggelis E, Makahi E (2015) Facilitating Community Participants' Research Engagement: Community Members' Perceptions of Community-based Research. Int J Nurs Clin Pract 2: 142. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15344/2394-4978/2015/142
The research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities of the National Institutes of Health under award number U54MD008149.

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the perspectives of community participants about engaging in community-based participatory research, and then to use the information to develop a model to depict the community participants’ perceptions of interfacing with academic researchers.
Method: A diverse group of Native Hawaiian community-dwelling participants engaged in openended and semi-structured focus group interviews, addressing community members’ perceptions of community-based participatory research.
Results: Three key areas were identified: (1) reciprocal trustable is needed; (2) perceptions about the purpose, research intent and expectations; (3) expectations of roles and responsibilities of the researcher(s). A model showing the reciprocity between the academic partner and the community partner is needed to establish the full CBPR process is proposed.
Conclusion: The three themes implied the community participants’ expectations of reciprocal relationships. The dimensions influencing community members’ perceptions of community-based research need to be taken into account when academic researchers interface with community participants. Successful community-based participatory research approaches for addressing the challenges of translating research findings into community actions is enhanced when the expectations of community members are taken into account.