International Journal of Surgery & Surgical Procedures Volume 2 (2017), Article ID 2:IJSSP-120, 3 pages
https://doi.org/10.15344/2456-4443/2017/120
https://doi.org/10.15344/2456-4443/2017/120
Original Article
Open Appendectomy in Children: Double Ligation Versus Stump Inversion
References
- Neves LJVA, Wainstein AJA, Wallace CM, Dias Costa FP, et al. ( 2011) Simple ligation or ligationand purse string invagination for the treatmentof the appendiceal stump: a prospective, randomized trial. ABCD arq bras cir dig 24: 1-7. View
- Houben F, Willmen HR (1998) Simplified appendectomy without stump embedding. Experiences of 20 years conventional and 5 years laparoscopic application. Chirurg 69: 66-70. View
- Street D, Bodai BI, Owens LJ, Moore DB, Walton CB, et al. (1988) Simple ligation vs stump inversion in appendectomy. Arch Surg 123: 689-690. View
- Engström L, Fenyö G (1985) Appendicectomy: assessment of stump invagination versus simple ligation: a prospective, randomized trial. Br J Surg 72: 971-972. View
- Blanc B, Pocard M (2009) Surgical techniques of appendectomy for acute appendicitis. J Chir (Paris) 146: 22-31. View
- Baldwin JF (1932) The prevention of fecal fistula after appendectomy. Ann Surg 95: 704-714. View
- Kathkouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorgyan A, Essani R (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Ann Surg 242: 439-450. View
- Lee SL, Yaghoubian A (2010) Comparison of pediatric appendicitis outcomes between teaching and nonteaching hospitals. J Ped Surg 45: 894 -897. View