Profile
International Journal of Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Volume 3 (2017), Article ID 3:IJPTR-135, 4 pages
https://doi. org/10.15344/2455-7498/2017/135
Research Article
Special Issue: Various Approaches for Rehabilitation Science
Short-term Intervention Effects of Dual-task Training on Injury and Disability Rates in Young Soccer Players

Kazumasa Nakagawa1*, Keisuke Hamada2, Hayato Inokuma3, Natsumi Chiba4, Shin Okazaki5, Kengo Yoshida6 and Yuko Takahashi1

1Department of Physiotherapy, Takasaki University of Health and Welfare, 501 Nakaoruicho, Takasaki City, Gunma, 370-0033, Japan
2Gunma University Hospital, Department of Rehabilitation, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-0034, Japan
3Kamimoku-Spa Hospital, Department of Rehabilitation, Minakami, Gunma, 379-1311, Japan
4Gunma Sports Association, Maebashi, Gunma, 372-0026, Japan
5Fujioka General Hospital, Department of Rehabilitation, Fujioka, Gunma, 375-8503, Japan
6Horie Hospital, Department of Rehabilitation, Ota, Takahayashihigashicho, Gunma, 373-0845, Japan
Dr. Kazumasa Nakagawa, Department of Physiotherapy, Takasaki University of Health and Welfare, 501 Nakaoruicho, Takasaki City, Gunma, 370-0033, Japan, Tel: +81-27-352-1291, Fax: +81-27-352-1985; E-mail: nakagawa-ka@takasaki-u.ac.jp
08 June 2017; 28 June 2017; 30 June 2017
Nakagawa K, Hamada K, Inokuma H, Chiba N, Okazaki S, et al. (2017) Short-term Intervention Effects of Dual-task Training on Injury and Disability Rates in Young Soccer Players. Int J Phys Ther Rehab 3: 135. doi: https://doi. org/10.15344/2455-7498/2017/135

Abstract

Background: In soccer performance, coordination training is important and there is a high chance of injury due to improper concentration during a performance, but there is little research on the relationship with injury. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of dual-task training on young soccer players' attention distribution ability, physical function and performance, and occurrence of injury.
Methods: The subjects were 70 soccer players as intervention group and 52 players were as control group (age of all subjects was 15.9 ± 0.8 years, the height was 168.8 ± 5.3 cm, and the body weight was 59.5 ± 6.2 kg). Agility t-test and an original dual-task agility t-test were measured as indicator of attention distribution ability. The history of subjects’ injuries was interviewed, and a single-leg triple hop for the distance test and a single-leg standing test with closed eyes were measured as physical function. The dual-task training concluded 5 items and the intervention was performed in approximately 20 minutes one time and six times over 3 weeks at a frequency of twice weekly. The number of people with injuries in each group and each measurement value was compared in each group.
Results: The control group comprised 10 subjects with injuries before intervention and 7 after intervention, whereas the intervention group comprised 12 subjects with injuries before intervention and 3 after intervention. No significant differences were observed in any of the parameters after the intervention in either of the two groups.
Conclusion: Whether this difference was caused by the intervention remains unclear; however, it is possible that the training program in this study was effective for short-term injury prevention. The contents of evaluation and training menu should be reexamined in the future.


1. Introduction

Coordination is important in sports performance, and its training should be executed during childhood and adolescence, along with an additional training [1], which not only improves sports performance but also provides physical education.

Nerve cells in the brain involved in intention are finite in number, and attention is mobilized to both tasks in a dual-task environment, whereby interference between tasks occurs (dual-task interference). It has been reported that the performance of each task or of both the tasks could be compromised by the dual-task interference [2]. Paradoxically, it is possible that the ability to pay appropriate attention to each task in a dual-task environment would lead to an improvement in performance, thereby improving the “attention distribution ability.”

Coordination training was originally developed in East Germany as a cognitive and information system training method [3]. Various trainings programs to improve attention distribution ability under multiple-task conditions have been developed, and “dual-task training” is one of the widely known methods. There have been numerous studies on dual-task training, which cover the following: development in early childhood [3,4] ; transference effect on the skill or technical aspects [5,6] ; relevance to brain mechanisms [7,8] ; and walking ability of the elderly not to fall, which has been a key topic, especially in Japan and other developed countries where the aging population is increasing [9-11]. Nevertheless, limited scientific verification is available, there are fewer studies targeting adolescents or young adults, and reports focusing on sports injury prevention are virtually nonexistent.

In particular, in sports, there is a high chance of injury due to improper concentration during a performance. Similarly, in soccer competitions, physical function and attention distribution skill is required, and the weather, field conditions, and ally and opponent movements should be considered. Moreover, the players must grasp the required information quickly and act promptly [12]. Some initiatives for coordination training in soccer have been reported [5]; however, most of them are concerned about the technical aspect of playing the game and the training ability, and little research is available on the relationship with injury.

We conducted short-term dual-task training in high school soccer players. This study aimed to compare the physical tests conducted before and after the intervention, in order to assess the effect of dualtask training on young soccer players' attention distribution ability, physical function and performance, and occurrence of injury.

2. Materials and Methods

In this study, a total of three measurements were conducted on 83 male soccer players at T high school in Japan. The subjects were divided into two groups, and there were provided usual training for one group and the dual-task training intervention added for the other one group. These two groups switched each other's training menu at the middle point, and then finally, 70 players with complete data were treated as the intervention group. Of the 13 players, 3 who dropped out were absent during one of the two measures, 10 had some kind of injury before the intervention that prevented them from participating in some measurements. From the first half group, the data of 52 subjects who did not undergo the dual-task training were extracted as the control group. The protocols and group definitions of this research were shown in figure 1. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) age of all subjects was 15.9 ± 0.8 years, the height was 168.8 ± 5.3 cm, and the body weight was 59.5 ± 6.2 kg.

figure 1
Figure 1: Protocols and definitions of this research Intervention group: totally 70 soccer players (combined 1+3), control group: totally 52 soccer players (2).

In addition to the agility t-test developed by Sassi [13] (TT), an original dual-task agility t-test (DTT) was conducted as an indicator of attention distribution ability for the subject. The TT was measured as the time taken to run and return to the starting point while touching the cones, which were T shaped, 10 m long, and 10 m wide, placed at each point of the course. In the DTT, the subjects performed the same task by multiplying two numbers in their mind while running the course; single (5-9) and double (13-19) digits were used. The numbers were visually presented behind each of the left and right cone points on the course. The physical therapists interviewed the subjects about the history of their injuries; these were noted if they occurred during the study or within 3 months prior to the study. And the injuries in this study were defined by those the subjects should rest even a day. At the second and third measurements, any injuries that had occurred since the previous measurement were noted.

For the other measurement items, a single-leg triple hop for the distance test (Hamilton et al. [14]) was done on both legs as an evaluation of lower-limb muscle strength and jump performance. A single-leg standing test with closed eyes was done on both legs to assess balance. Each test was performed twice, and the best values were measured.

The subjects were informed about the purpose and details of this study beforehand, and the intervention and evaluation were conducted after their consent. As all the subjects were too young, the consent was obtained from their parents and the soccer club leader. This study was approved in advance by the Takasaki Health and Welfare University Ethics Review Committee (No. 2755). The following tasks were carried out for the dual-task training: (1) a man balances a small ball (turning front → turning back) on one leg in a standing position, (2) a man simultaneously throws two balls and catches both balls, (3) two men throw multiple balls at the same time and catch a ball at the same time, (4) running an obstacle course while holding a ball on a spoon, (5) lifting a soccer ball while doing a word game. The aforementioned trainings were devised after confirming that. they would be moderately difficult for healthy college students. The intervention was performed six times over 3 weeks at a frequency of twice weekly, and four items were selected from five types of training for one intervention and were collectively carried out as a training program of approximately 20 min each. The difficulty was increased at every instance so that the subjects would not find it easier.

The number of people with injuries in each group was visually compared before and after the targeted period and each measurement value was compared using a corresponding Student´s t-test in each group. For statistical analyisis, Excel statistics Statcel, version 3, was used. The level of significance was set at 5%. Effect sizes are given as Hedges’g throughout.

3. Results

The control group comprised 10 subjects with injuries before the whole period and 7 after the period, whereas the intervention group comprised 12 subjects with injuries before intervention period and 3 after the period. No significant differences were observed in any of the parameters after the whole period in either of the two groups. Moreover, no difference was observed in the DTT targeted parameter of attention distribution ability (intervention group: TT 10.81 ± 0.57 s → 10.79 ± 0.53 s, DTT 11.48 ± 1.00 s → 11.69 ± 0.93 s). The results of the measurement are shown in Table 1.

table 1
Table 1: The results of measurements.
Rt: right, Lt: left, Ave: average, SD: standard deviation, ES: effect size (Hedges’ g), CI: confidence interval.

4. Discussion

The number of injured subjects decreased in the intervention group compared with that of the control group. Whether this difference was caused by the intervention remains unclear; however, it is possible that the training program in this study was effective for short-term injury prevention. It has been reported that working memory training in a similar 1-2 month period might be beneficial for maintaining and improving the cognitive functioning in old age [15]. Additionally, some reports have shown the possibility of working memory performance being improved throughout the life span [16], and one report revealed the train ability of cognitive ability for athletes compared to nonathletes [17]. Whether this is equivalent for young people or athletes is doubtful and it needs to be discussed in the future. Furthermore, it has been reported by Gil et al. [19] that young volleyball players should dedicate at least 4 h weekly for their training to achieve a significant improvement in cognition. It would also be necessary for each sport to reorganize the training program as an effective intervention, taking into account the content, intensity, frequency, and the effect of continuing such training from a longterm perspective. In addition, in this study, physical function and performance did not change. Since, not only physical function and performance but also many environmental factors and other factors are concerned with regard to injuries, it is necessary to consider these factors as well.

In this study, DTT was measured as an indicator of attention distribution ability, but no change was observed. One of the factors for this could be the deviation between the content of evaluation and that of interventions. It was reported that an adequate cognitive task was required for enhance attention distribution ability [2], and it was also shown that under a balance task with a cognitive task, postural control appeared to take priority over cognitive processing [6]. Since the intervention in this study consisted of a lot of balance tasks, it could not be adequate for a cognitive task in this study.

Additionally, the DTT could not be a suitable assessment as the attention distribution ability in this study. A calculation task was used as the cognitive task in this study, which was moderately difficult for college students before the measurement, and it was possibly too difficult for some of the subjects. The test should be developed to have reasonable reliability and validity in both single- and dual- task methods, and it needed to show that the dual-task method might be an appropriate way to assess coordination in the targeted subjects. As a cognitive evaluation set, numerous methods of evaluation have been reported, mainly for walking function, in studies targeting the elderly [19]; however, there have been some evaluation methods reported in young subjects with post traumatic brain injury [20]. Although there have been several reports on balance function and the evaluation method in the static motion [21], there have been almost no evaluation methods specialized for athletes and sports movements. Notably, a reexamination of an appropriate evaluation method needs to be discussed in the future.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

All authors made substantial contributions to the conception and design, acquisition of data. Keisuke Hamada and Kazumasa Nakagawa were mainly took charge of analysis and interpretation of data and Yuko Takahashi and Kazumasa Nakagawa were mainly involved in drafting the manuscript or revising it critically on important intellectual contents. Each author has participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for appropriate portions of the contents.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank to staff of the soccer team, all study subjects and Mr. Nobuhiro Takezako belonging to Takasaki University of Health and Welfare attached clinic for their cooperation to this study.


References

  1. Abernethy B (1988) The effects of age and expertise upon perceptual skill development in a racquet sport. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 59: 210-221 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Jono Y, Kanai S, Goto T, Harada R, Hujitaka Y, et al. (2013) Effect of dual task interference between motor task and cognitive task (in Japanese). Japanese Journal of Health Promotion and Physical Therapy 3: 47-51 [CrossRef]
  3. Gundlach H (1968) Systembeziehungen und körperliche Fähigkeiten und Fertigkeiten (in German). In: Theorie und praxis der körperkultur 17, Beiheft, pp. 198-204
  4. Harre HD, Krug J, Schnabel SPG (2014) Trainingslehre- Trainingswissenschaft: Leistung-Training-Wettkampf (in German). (4th edition), Meyer & Meyer
  5. Trecroci A, Cavaggioni L, Caccia R, Alberti G (2015) Jump rope training: balance and motor coordination in preadolescent soccer players. J Sports Sci Med 14: 792-208 [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Resch JE, May B, Tomporowski PD, Ferrara MS (2011) Balance performance with a cognitive task: a continuation of the dual-task testing paradigm. J Athl Train 46: 170-175 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Yokoyama H, Okazaki K, Imai D, Yamashita Y, Takeda R, et al. (2015) The effect of cognitive-motor dual-task training on cognitive function and plasma amyloid β peptide 42/40 ratio in healthy elderly persons: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr 15:60 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Mochizuki AA, Kirino E (2008) Effects of coordination exercises on brain activation: a functional MRI study. International Journal of Sport and Health Science 6: 98-104 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lundin-Olsson L, Nyberg L, Gustafson Y (1997) “Stops walking when talking” as a predictor of falls in elderly people. Lancet 349: 617 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Schrodt LA, Mercer VS, Giuliani CA, Hartman M (2004) Characteristics of stepping over an obstacle in community dwelling older adults under dualtask condition. Gait Posture 19: 279-287 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Bootsma-van der Wiel A, Gussekloo J, de Craen AJ, van Exel E, Bloem BR, et al. (2003) Walking and talking as predictors of falls in the general population: the Leiden 85-plus study. J Am Geriatr Soc 51: 1466-1471 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Vilar L, Araujo D, Trayassos B, Davids K (2014) Coordination tendencies are shaped by attacker and defender interactions with the goal and the ball in futsal. Human Movement Science 33: 14-24 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sassi RH, Dardouri W, Yahmed MH, Gmada N, Mahfoudhi ME, et al. (2009) Relative and absolute reliability of a modified agility t-test and its relationship with vertical jump and straight sprint. J Strength Cond Res 23: 1644-1651 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Hamilton RT, Shultz SJ, Schmitz RJ, Perrin DH (2008) Triple-hop distance as a valid predictor of lower limb strength and power. J Athlet Train 43: 144-151 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Heinzel S, Schulte S, Onkel J, Duong QL, Riemer TG, et al. (2014) Working memory training improvements and gains in non-trainined cognitive tasks in young and older adults. Neurosychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 21: 146-173 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. von Bastian CC, Langer N, Jäncke L, Oberauer K (2013) Effects of working memory training in young and old adults. Mem Cognit 41: 611-624 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Chaddock L, Neider MB, Voss MW, Gaspar JG, Kramer AF (2011) Do athletes excel everyday tasks? Med Sci Sports Exerc 43: 1920-1926 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Gil A, Moreno MP, Moreno A, García-González L, Claver F, et al. (2013) Analysis of the relationship between the amount of training and cognitive expertise. A study of young volleyball players. J Strength Cond Res 27: 698-702 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Menant JC, Schoene D, Sarofim M, Lord SR (2014) Single and dual task tests of gait speed are equivalent in the prediction of falls in older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev 16: 83-104 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. Foley JA, Cantagallo A, Della Sala S, Logie RH (2010) Dual task performance and post traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 24: 851-858 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Ross LM, Register-Mihalik JK, Mihalik JP, McCulloch KL, Prentice WE, et al. (2011) Effects of a single-task versus a dual-task paradigm on cognition and balance in healthy subjects. J Sport Rehabil 20: 296-310 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]