Profile
International Journal of Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Volume 3 (2017), Article ID 3:IJPTR-135, 4 pages
https://doi. org/10.15344/2455-7498/2017/135
Research Article
Special Issue: Various Approaches for Rehabilitation Science
Short-term Intervention Effects of Dual-task Training on Injury and Disability Rates in Young Soccer Players

Kazumasa Nakagawa1*, Keisuke Hamada2, Hayato Inokuma3, Natsumi Chiba4, Shin Okazaki5, Kengo Yoshida6 and Yuko Takahashi1

1Department of Physiotherapy, Takasaki University of Health and Welfare, 501 Nakaoruicho, Takasaki City, Gunma, 370-0033, Japan
2Gunma University Hospital, Department of Rehabilitation, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-0034, Japan
3Kamimoku-Spa Hospital, Department of Rehabilitation, Minakami, Gunma, 379-1311, Japan
4Gunma Sports Association, Maebashi, Gunma, 372-0026, Japan
5Fujioka General Hospital, Department of Rehabilitation, Fujioka, Gunma, 375-8503, Japan
6Horie Hospital, Department of Rehabilitation, Ota, Takahayashihigashicho, Gunma, 373-0845, Japan
Dr. Kazumasa Nakagawa, Department of Physiotherapy, Takasaki University of Health and Welfare, 501 Nakaoruicho, Takasaki City, Gunma, 370-0033, Japan, Tel: +81-27-352-1291, Fax: +81-27-352-1985; E-mail: nakagawa-ka@takasaki-u.ac.jp
08 June 2017; 28 June 2017; 30 June 2017
Nakagawa K, Hamada K, Inokuma H, Chiba N, Okazaki S, et al. (2017) Short-term Intervention Effects of Dual-task Training on Injury and Disability Rates in Young Soccer Players. Int J Phys Ther Rehab 3: 135. doi: https://doi. org/10.15344/2455-7498/2017/135

Abstract

Background: In soccer performance, coordination training is important and there is a high chance of injury due to improper concentration during a performance, but there is little research on the relationship with injury. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of dual-task training on young soccer players' attention distribution ability, physical function and performance, and occurrence of injury.
Methods: The subjects were 70 soccer players as intervention group and 52 players were as control group (age of all subjects was 15.9 ± 0.8 years, the height was 168.8 ± 5.3 cm, and the body weight was 59.5 ± 6.2 kg). Agility t-test and an original dual-task agility t-test were measured as indicator of attention distribution ability. The history of subjects’ injuries was interviewed, and a single-leg triple hop for the distance test and a single-leg standing test with closed eyes were measured as physical function. The dual-task training concluded 5 items and the intervention was performed in approximately 20 minutes one time and six times over 3 weeks at a frequency of twice weekly. The number of people with injuries in each group and each measurement value was compared in each group.
Results: The control group comprised 10 subjects with injuries before intervention and 7 after intervention, whereas the intervention group comprised 12 subjects with injuries before intervention and 3 after intervention. No significant differences were observed in any of the parameters after the intervention in either of the two groups.
Conclusion: Whether this difference was caused by the intervention remains unclear; however, it is possible that the training program in this study was effective for short-term injury prevention. The contents of evaluation and training menu should be reexamined in the future.