Profile

New User

New to Graphy Publications? Create an account to get started today.

Registered Users

Have an account? Sign in now.

How to Cite | Author Information | Publication History | Funding Information
International Journal of Clinical Case Studies Volume 3 (2017), Article ID 3:IJCCS-121, 6 pages
https://doi.org/10.15344/2455-2356/2017/121
Case Study
High-force Haptic Rehabilitation Robot and Motor Outcomes in Chronic Stroke

Carol A. Wamsley1*, Roshan Rai2 and Michelle J. Johnson2,3

1Therapy Division, Good Shepherd Penn Partners, 1800 Lombard Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19146, USA
2Rehabilitation Robotics R&D Lab (PMR,3RD Lab), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
3Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Carol A. Wamsley, Therapy Division, Good Shepherd Penn Partners, 1800 Lombard Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19146, USA; E-mail: carol.wamsley@uphs.upenn.edu
07 January 2017; 06 March 2017; 08 March 2017
Wamsley CA, Rai R, Johnson MJ (2017) High-force Haptic Rehabilitation Robot and Motor Outcomes in Chronic Stroke. Int J Clin Case Stud 3: 121. doi: https://doi.org/10.15344/2455-2356/2017/121
The project was funded by the American Heart Association. Grant No #0635450Z.
© 2017 Wamsley et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

References

  1. Theriault A, Nagurka M, Johnson MJ (2014) Design and development of an affordable haptic robot with force-feedback and compliant actuation to improve therapy for patients with severe hemiparesis. IEEE Trans Haptics 7: 161-174. View
  2. Theriault A, Nagurka M, Johnson MJ (2014 ) Therapeutic potential of Haptic Theradrive: An affordable robot/computer system for motivating stroke rehabilitation. In Proc of 5th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob), p. 415-420. View
  3. Center for Disease Control and Prevention - Stroke Web site. View
  4. Writing Group Members, Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, et al. (2016) Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2016 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation 133: e38-360. View
  5. Krishnamurthi RV, Feigin VL, Forouzanfar MH, Mensah GA, Connor M5, et al. (2013) Global and regional burden of first-ever ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke during 1990-2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet Glob Health 1: e259-281. View
  6. Feigin VL, Forouzanfar MH, Krishnamurthi R, Mensah GA, Connor M, et al. (2014) Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990-2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 383: 245-254. View
  7. GBD 2013 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators (2015) Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 385: 117-171. View
  8. Nakayama H, Jørgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS (1994) Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75: 394-398. View
  9. Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney Lr, et al. (2016) Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 48: Issue 3. View
  10. Faria-Fortini I, Michaelsen SM, Cassiano JG, Teixeira-Salmela LF (2011) Upper extremity function in stroke subjects: relationships between the International Classification of Functioning, disability, and health domains. J Hand Ther 24: 257-264. View
  11. Milot MH, Spencer SJ, Chan V, Allington JP, Klein J, et al. (2013) A crossover pilot study evaluating the functional outcomes of two different types of robotic movement training in chronic stroke survivors using the arm exoskeleton BONES. J Neuroeng Rehabil 10: 112. View
  12. Cho KH, Song WK (2015) Robot-Assisted Reach Training for Improving Upper Extremity Function of Chronic Stroke. Tohoku J Exp Med 237: 149- 155. View
  13. Krebs HI, Volpe BT (2013) Rehabilitation robotics. Handb Clin Neurol 110: 283-294. View
  14. Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG, Haselkorn JK, Wittenberg GF, et al. (2010) Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med 362: 1772-1783. View
  15. Basteris A, Nijenhuis SM, Stienen AH, Buurke JH, Prange GB, et al. (2014) Training modalities in robot-mediated upper limb rehabilitation in stroke: a framework for classification based on a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil 11: 111. View
  16. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, et al. (2005) The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 53: 695-699. View
  17. Aben I, Verhey F, Lousberg R, Lodder J, Honig A (2002) Validity of the beck depression inventory, hospital anxiety and depression scale, SCL-90, and hamilton depression rating scale as screening instruments for depression in stroke patients. Psychosomatics 43: 386-393. View
  18. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S (1975) The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 7: 13-31. View
  19. Duncan PW, Propst M, Nelson SG (1983) Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Phys Ther 63: 1606-1610. View
  20. Mathiowetz V, Vizenor L, Melander D (2000) Comparison of Baseline instrumentations to the Jamar Dynamometer and the B & L Engineering Pinch Gauge. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research 20: 147-162. View
  21. Mathiowetz V, Kashman N, Volland G, Weber K, Dowe M, et al. (1985) Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 66: 69-74. View
  22. Chanubol R, Wongphaet P, Ot NC, Chira-Adisai W, Kuptniratsaikul P, et al. (2012) Correlation between the action research arm test and the box and block test of upper extremity function in stroke patients. J Med Assoc Thai 95: 590-597. View
  23. Bohannon RW, Smith MB (1987) Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther 67: 206-207. View
  24. Lin JH, Hsu MJ, Sheu CF, Wu TS, Lin RT, et al. (2009) Psychometric comparisons of 4 measures for assessing upper-extremity function in people with stroke. Phys Ther 89: 840-850. View
  25. Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R, Foley NC, Bitensky J (2005) Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF Body Functions. Disabil Rehabil 27: 191-207. View
  26. Nakayama H, Jørgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS (1994) Compensation in recovery of upper extremity function after stroke: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75: 852-857. View
  27. Otaka E, Otaka Y, Kasuga S, Nishimoto A, Yamazaki K, et al. (2015) Clinical usefulness and validity of robotic measures of reaching movement in hemiparetic stroke patients. J NeuroEng Rehabil 12: 66. View
  28. Timmermans AA, Lemmens RJ, Monfrance M, Geers RP, Bakx W, et al. (2014) Effects of task-oriented robot training on arm function, activity, and quality of life in chronic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil 11: 45. View
  29. Zondervan DK, Augsburger R, Bodenhoefer B, Friedman N, Reinkensmeyer DJ, et al. (2015) Machine-Based, Self-guided Home Therapy for Individuals With Severe Arm Impairment After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 29: 395-406. View
Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, Safari, Above IE 9.0 version
Privacy Policy | Copyright & Permissions
Copyright © 2013-2023 Graphy Publications, All Rights Reserved.