Profile
International Journal of Clinical Case Studies Volume 3 (2017), Article ID 3:IJCCS-121, 6 pages
https://doi.org/10.15344/2455-2356/2017/121
Case Study
High-force Haptic Rehabilitation Robot and Motor Outcomes in Chronic Stroke

Carol A. Wamsley1*, Roshan Rai2 and Michelle J. Johnson2,3

1Therapy Division, Good Shepherd Penn Partners, 1800 Lombard Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19146, USA
2Rehabilitation Robotics R&D Lab (PMR,3RD Lab), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
3Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Carol A. Wamsley, Therapy Division, Good Shepherd Penn Partners, 1800 Lombard Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19146, USA; E-mail: carol.wamsley@uphs.upenn.edu
07 January 2017; 06 March 2017; 08 March 2017
Wamsley CA, Rai R, Johnson MJ (2017) High-force Haptic Rehabilitation Robot and Motor Outcomes in Chronic Stroke. Int J Clin Case Stud 3: 121. doi: https://doi.org/10.15344/2455-2356/2017/121
The project was funded by the American Heart Association. Grant No #0635450Z.

Abstract

Background: Haptic TheraDrive is a low-cost robotic system that uses off-the-shelf computer gaming wheels with force feedback for post-stroke upper extremity rehabilitation. Preliminary results have shown that the Haptic TheraDrive system is not capable of delivering effective therapy to low-functioning patients. A new low-cost, high-force haptic robot with a single degree of freedom has been developed to address this concern. The purpose of this case is to determine the impact on motor performance and function with use of a custom force-feedback device, Haptic TheraDrive, to complete games for rehabilitation in a low-to-moderate functioning stroke survivor with hemiplegia.
Methods: A case study design was used with a 52-year old male 22 months post stroke. His Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity of 37/66 indicated a low-to-moderate functioning upper extremity. The subject participated in Haptic TheraDrive robot use for computer gaming of movement timing, velocity and accuracy for 3 x/a week for one month (10 sessions) - approximately 60 minutes per session. An adaptive controller monitored the subject's performance to ensure that the exercises were difficult but doable.
Results: After session 10 the subject demonstrated improvements in: Fugl-Meyer Arm Motor Scale (8 points), coordination speed (59%), grip strength (18%) and Box and Block Test (122%). Gains at one month follow up included: Fugl-Meyer Arm Motor Scale (11 points, a minimally clinically important difference), coordination speed (63%), and grip strength (39%). Since completion of the training long terms gains included: Fugl-Meyer Arm Motor Scale (3 points), coordination speed (9%) and grip strength (18%).
Conclusion: TheraDrive provides an adaptive controller using force-feedback to deliver individualized and effective therapy for a single low-to-moderate functioning stroke survivor with hemiplegia. The long-term goal of this project is to develop an inexpensive high-force haptic rehabilitation robot that can safely be used by patients at home.