Profile
International Journal of Pediatrics & Neonatal Care Volume 2 (2016), Article ID 1:IJPNC-118, 4 pages
https://doi.org/10.15344/2455-2364/2016/118
Review Article
Non-invasive Ventilation in Preterm Infants: A Clinical Review

Friedrich Reiterer1* and Richard A. Polin2

1Clinical Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescence Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 30, 8036 Graz, Austria
2College of Physician and Surgeons, Columbia University, Morgan Stanley Children´s Hospital of New-Presbyterian, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA
Prof. Friedrich Reiterer, Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescence Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 30, 8036 Graz, Austria; E-mail: friedrich.reiterer@medunigraz.at
15 November 2016; 14 December 2016; 16 December 2016
Reiterer F, Polin RA (2016) Non-invasive Ventilation in Preterm Infants: A Clinical Review. Int J Pediatr Neonat Care 2: 118. doi: https://doi.org/10.15344/2455-2364/2016/118

Abstract

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has gained increased popularity in the neonatal intensive care unit, because it is less likely to cause the short and long-term pulmonary complications associated with invasive mechanical ventilation. There are now number of NIV strategies available for the routine respiratory care of preterm infants including nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP), nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), nasal high frequency oscillatory ventilation (NHFO) and high flow nasal cannula (HFNC). These strategies are often used in combination with less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) and methylxanthines to augment respiratory drive. This review describes these various modes of NIV evaluating their impact on neonatal mortality and morbidity in preterm infants.


1. Introduction

With the increased survival of extreme low gestational ageneonates (ELGAN)< 28 week´s non-intubated, non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has gained increased popularity in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). The primary aim of NIV is to provide respiratory support without the pulmonary and non-pulmonary complications associated with intubation and mechanical ventilation. One serious long-term pulmonary complication associated with positive pressure ventilation is bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), commonly defined as oxygen dependency at 36 weeks´s postmenstrual age. There are a number of ways NIV can be applied, including nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP), nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), nasal high frequency oscillatory ventilation (NHFOV) and humidified high flow nasal cannula (HFNC). Of these, NCPAP, started soon after birth has become the first line strategy for the management of preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) (figure 1), especially in combination with INSURE (intubation surfactant administration followed by immediate extubation) [1,2]. Caffeine is often used as an adjunct therapy in infants receiving NIV to augment the respiratory drive [3]. The purpose of the review is to describe various modes of NIV and to evaluate their impact on neonatal mortality and morbidity. For a more comprehensive discourse on this hot topic of non-invasive respiratory support in preterm infants I refer to very recently published clinical and systematic reviews and metaanalysis [4-6].

figure 1
Figure 1: Respiratory support strategies in preterm infants with RDS.

2. Modalities of NIV

2.1 NCPAP

Maintaining a normal functional residual capacity to improve gas exchange is a fundamental therapeutic concept for the atelectatic lung in neonates with RDS. In 1971 Gregory reported a small clinical trial in which NCPAP was used successfully in 20 infants (birth weight 930 to 3800 g) with severe RDS [7]. Oxygenation was significantly improved and 16 patients survived. In a retrospective observational study of eight tertiary centers [8] in 1987, Avery et al. reported a significant lower incidence of CLD (arbitrary defined as the need for increased inspired oxygen at 28 days of age) in one center where the predominant mode of respiratory support was the use of NCPAP (pressure around 5 mmHg); there were no significant differences in mortality. Despite the success with CPAP at one center, most other centers continued to prefer conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) as a first line treatment for RDS. In the early 1990’s randomized clinical trials of surfactant administration demonstrated significant reductions in neonatal mortality and pulmonary air leaks. The acceptance of surfactant therapy in combination with improvements in the performance of neonatal ventilators further supported the dominant role of CMV for the respiratory management of preterm infants with RDS. But despite the widespread use of surfactant therapy, rates of BPD did not change [9]. That led to a renewed interest in NIV. NCPAP can be delivered using a ventilator or by special CPAP-systems, which differ mainly in the way the end expiratory pressure is generated (table 1). In ventilators an expiratory valve is used to adjust the expiratory pressure. In so called NCPAP “flow-driver” systems the pressure is generated by adjusting the inspiratory flow or altering the expiratory resistance. However, the most widely used CPAP system is bubble- CPAP. In this system, the pressure is produced by inserting the distal end of the expiratory limb in water and the depth to which the tube is immersed equals the CPAP pressure. The gas flow leaving the circuit via the expiratory limbs produces continuous bubbling and pressure oscillations which may facilitate gas exchange. The most common interface used with CPAP systems are binasal prongs. However, a mask or nasopharyngeal tube can also be used. In infants with RDS a starting pressure of about 5-8 mm Hg [1] is commonly selected.

table 1
Table 1: Modes and settings of non-invasive pressure assist for preterm infants.

Recent meta-analyses have shown that early NCPAP compared to routine endotracheal intubation and prophylactic surfactant administration reduces the combined outcome of death and BPD [6,10,11] in preterm infants with RDS. Some guidelines continue to recommend the INSURE technique as an adjunct strategy for preterm babies with RDS placed on NCPAP [1,2], however, there is no evidence that the INSURE technique decreases the incidence of BPD above that of NIV. Less invasive methods to administer surfactant (LISA e.g., using a thin plastic catheter) [12] are not yet recommended, but may decrease the combined outcome of death and BPD [6].

2.2 NIPPV

There are a number of overlapping NIPPV terms used in the literature such as Bi-level CPAP, N-BiPAP, Si-PAP, DUOPAP describing basically the same functional principle, namely providing cycling inspiratory pressures in addition to the single, basic CPAP pressure, which is unchanged throughout the respiratory cycle (figure 2)[13]. This strategy may be beneficial in preterm infants with increased work of breathing and or inconsistent respiratory drive. NIPPV may be synchronized with the patient spontaneous inspiration (SNIPPV), by using a pneumatic and abdominal capsule, a flow sensor or by using a special ventilator responding to the patient´s diaphragm activity. This latter synchronization technique is called neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) and is used for or invasive and non-invasive ventilation [14,15]. The use of NAVA seems to be safe, though larger studies are needed. The technology for applying NIPPV has not been not standardized and different trials have used varying modes (table 1). When applied with a neonatal ventilator NIPPV can be performed in an assist control mode in which every breath of the infant is supported by a ventilator inflation [16]. NIPPV modes are commonly used to support extubation and as a rescue therapy after NCPAP failure. In a prospective study of 78 preterm infants less than 32 weeks’s gestation the application of SNIPPV avoided intubation in more that 70% of the infants; no adverse effects were detected [17]. However, it remains unknown if NIPPV is better than NCPAP or if SNIPPV is better than non-synchronized forms of NIPPV [18,19]. Data suggest that SNIPPV seems to be more effective than non-synchronized NIPPV or NCPAP in treating apnea of prematurity [16]. In a recently published Cochrane meta-analysis comparing the use of various NIPPV modes versus NCPAP, NIPPV reduced the incidence of extubation failure, but had no effect on chronic lung disease or mortality [20]. General complications with the use CPAP and NIPPV may include gastric distension (“CPAP-belly”) from swallowing excessive air, nasal septum erosion or necrosis, nasal obstruction from secretions or improper application of nasal prongs and air leaks [21-23].

figure 2
Figure 2: DUOPAP-mode and settings in a neonatal ventilator (Fabian, Acutronic, Switzerland) in the post-extubation phase of a preterm infant with RDS, DUOPAP uses infant flow generator for PEEP generation, double arrows show CPAP=PEEP (4 mbar) and PDUO=PIP ( 8 mbar, delta PIP = 4 mbar),giving a flow of 6 and 12,5 L/min respectively. The dotted line indicates the CPAP=PEEP level throughout the respiratory cycles.

3. Nasal High Frequency Ventilation (NHFV)

NHFV is a noninvasive form of HFV used with different ventilators and delivered through nasal interfaces [24-26]. Nasal high frequency oscillatory ventilation (NHFOV), might be considered an alternative to CMV and other modes of NIV. NHFOV generates CPAP using a bias flow with oscillations of constant frequency and active expiratory phase superimposed on spontaneous tidal breathing. It has similarities to bubble CPAP, but the oscillations on bubble CPAP are much smaller, irregular and have no active expiratory phase. There are a limited number of small and uncontrolled published clinical NHFOV studies suggesting that NHFOV is safe and feasible [25]. In a recently published pilot randomized controlled trail in 39 infants < 1500 g NHFV was not superior to biphasic-CPAP following CPAP failure [26]. Larger multicenter studies are necessary before widespread implementation of this NIV-technique.

4. High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC)

HFNC is gaining popularity in the NICU as an alternative for NCPAP. By delivering high flow rates, usually in the range of 4-8 L/min. HFNC supports ventilation and oxygenation by reducing inspiratory resistance, washing out carbon dioxide from the nasopharyngeal space and by providing a small amount of positive airway pressure [27]. With increasing flow rates nasopharyngeal pressure rises linearly providing additional CPAP [28]. HFNC may be more comfortable for the infant than NCPAP. Furthermore, it induces less nasal trauma and is preferred by nurses for large preterm infants [29,30]. A recent Cochrane meta-analysis including 14 studies in preterm infants of various gestational age and birth weight comparing HFNC with other non-invasive forms of respiratory support in preterm infants immediately after birth or following extubation, showed equivalent rates of treatment failure following mechanical ventilation and similar rates of BPD [31]. However, there are relatively few studies in infants< 1,000 grams. When used as primary support for preterm infants> =28 weeks of gestation with early respiratory distress not treated with surfactant, HFNC resulted in a significantly higher rate of treatment failure than did NCPAP [32]. Based on evidence from recent clinical trials, HFNC is currently not recommended as an alternative for NCPAP during the acute phase of RDS but may be of benefit on some patients during the weaning phase [1,33].

5. Future Directions

Despite the enthusiasm for NIV, in preterm infants a number of infants will require intubation and positive pressure ventilation. Therefore, potential lung-protective strategies during positive pressure ventilation should be further investigated [34]. It will be important to evaluate and implement other non-invasive modalities and techniques to prevent lung and/or brain injury such as the administration of surfactant by inhalation, neuroprotective drugs, automated control of inspired oxygen, NAVA and combined respiratory and cerebral monitoring [35]. BPD is a multi-factorial disease and it´s prevention requires optimization of all clinical aspects in modern perinatal and neonatal care [36].

6. Conclusion

Based on the current best evidence from the literature it seems that early NCPAP applied via binasal prongs, may be the optimal strategy for preterm infants with RDS. Furthermore, it reduces the risk of death or BPD. NIPPV may offer advantages in terms of less extubation failure and a lower reintubation rate, but has no effect on mortality or BPD. HFNC, should not be considered an alternative to NCPAP or NIPPV in the acute phase of RDS, but may be equivalent to NCPAP post-extubation. In general, success rates of NIV may vary considerably and in part depends how success or failure is defined and how NIV is utilized.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Abbreviations

NIV: Non-invasive ventilation,
NCPAP: Nasal continuous positive airway pressure,
PEEP: Positive end-expiratory pressure,
PIP: Positive inspiratory pressure,
CMV: Conventional mechanical ventilation,
HFV: High frequency ventilation,
NIPPV: Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation,
SIMV: Synchronised intermittent mandatory ventilation,
SNIPPV: Synchronized NIPPV,
NSNIPPV: Non synchronized NIPPV,
BIPAP: Bi-level-phasic positive airway pressure,
NAVA: Neurally adjusted ventilatory drive,
NHF: Nasal high frequency ventilation,
NHFO: Nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation,
HFNC: High-flow nasal cannula,
NICU: Neonatal intensive care unit,
ELGAN: Extreme low gestational age neonates,
RDS: Respiratory distress syndrome,
BPD: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia,
INSURE: Intubation surfactant administration and rapid extubation,
LISA: Less invasive surfactant administration


References

  1. Sweet DG, Carnielli V, Greisen G, Hallman M, Ozek E, et al. (2017) European consensus guidelines on the management of respiratory distress syndrome - 2016 Update. Neonatology 111: 107-125 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Committee on Fetus and Newborn; American Academy of Pediatrics (2014) Respiratory support in preterm infants at birth. Pediatrics 133: 171-174 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Schmidt B, Roberts RS, Davis P, Doyle LW, Barrington KJ, et al. (2006) Caffeine therapy for apnea of prematurity. N Engl J Med 354: 2212-2221 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Yoder BA, Kirpalani H (eds.). (2016) Non-invasive ventilation. Clinics in Perinatol Dec 43, Elsevier
  5. Jensen EA, Kirpalani H (2016) Non-invasive respiratory support. Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal 21: 133-124
  6. Isayama T, Iwami H, Sarah McDonald S, Beyene J (2016) Association of noninvasive ventilation strategies with mortality and bronchopulmonary dysplasia among preterm infants. A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 316: 611-624 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Gregory GA, Kitterman JA, Phipps RH, Tooley WH, Hamilton WK (1971) Treatment of respiratory distress syndrome with continuous positive airway pressure. N Engl J Med 284: 1333-1340 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Avery ME, Tooley W, Keller JB, Hurd SS, Bryan MH, et al. (1987) Is chronic lung disease in low birthweight infants preventable ? A survey of eight centers. Pediatrics 97: 26-30 [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Bell EF, Walsh MC, Carlo WA et al. (2015) Trends in care practices, morbidity, and mortality of extremely preterm neonates 1993-2012. JAMA 2015; 314: 1039-51 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Aldana-Aguirre JC, Pinto M, Featherstone RM, Kumar M (2016) Less invasive surfactant administration versus intubation for surfactant delivery in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 102: F17-F23 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Schmölzer GM, Kumar M, Pichler G, Aziz K, O'Reilly M, et al. (2013) Noninvasive versus invasive respiratory support in preterm infants at birth: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 347: f5980 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Herting E (2013) Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA)- ways to deliver surfactant in spontaneously breathing infants. Early Human Develop 89: 875-880 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Roberts CT, Davis PG, Owen LS (2013) Neonatal non-invasive respiratory support: synchronized NIPPV, non-synchronized NIPPV or Bi-level CPAP: what is the evidence in 2013? Neonatology 104: 203-20913 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Narchi H, Chedid F (2015) Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in very low birthweight infants: current status. World J Methodol 5: 62-67 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Kallio M, Koskela U, Peltoniemi O, Kontiokari T, Pokka T, et al. (2016) Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome- a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Pediatr 175: 1175-1183 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Gizzi C, Montecchia F, Panetta V , Castellano C, Mariani C, et al. (2015) Is synchronized NIPPV more effective than NIPPV and NCPAP in treating apnoe of prematurity (AOP)? A randomized cross-over trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 100: F17-F23 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Ramos-Navaro C, Sanchez-Luna M, Sanz-Lopez E, Maderuelo-Rodriguez E, Zamora-Flores E (2016) Effectiveness of synchronized non-invasive ventilation to prevent intubation in preterm infants. AJP Rep 6: e264-e271 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Kirpalani H, Millar D, Lemyre B, Yoder BA, Aaron Chiu A, et al. (2013) A trial comparing noninvasive ventilation strategies in preterm Infants. N Engl J Med 369: 611-620 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Waitz M, Mense L, Kirpalami H, Leymre B Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation: synchronized or not?. Clin Perinatol 43: 799-816 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Lemyre B, Davis PG, De Paoli AG, Kirpalani H. (2017) Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2: CD003212 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Sahni R, Schiaratura M, Polin RA (2016) Strategies for the prevention of continuous positive airway pressure failure. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 21: 196-203 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Reiterer F, Zotter H, Schmölzer H, Resch B (2010) Pulmonary air leaks and NCPAP failure in late preterm infants with respiratory distress. Journal of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine 3: 193-199 [Google Scholar]
  23. Morley CJ, Davis PG, Doyle LW, Brion LP, Hascoet JM, et al. (2008) for the COIN Trial Investigations.Nasal CPAP or intubation at birth for very preterm infants at birth. New Engl J Med 358: 700-708 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Czernik C, Schmalisch G, Buhrer C, Proquitte H (2012) Weaning of neonates from mechanical ventilation by use of nasopharyngeal highfrequency oscillatory ventilation: a preliminary study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 25: 374-378 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. De Luca D, Dell´Orto V (2016) Non-invasive high frequency oscillatory ventilation in neonates: review of physiology, biology and clinical data. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 101: F565-F570 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Mukeriji A, Sarmiento K, Lee B, Hassall, Shah V (2017) Non-invasive highfrequency ventilation versus bi-phasic continuous positive airway pressure (BP-CPAP) following CPAP failure in infants < 1250 g: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Perinatol 37: 49-53 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Kotecha SJ, Adappa R, Gupta N, Watkins S, Kotecha S, et al. (2015) Safety and efficiency of high-flow nasal cannula therapy in preterm infants: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 136: 542-553 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Collins CL, Holberton JR, König K (2013) Comparison of the pharyngeal pressure provided by two heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannulae devices in preterm infants. J Paediatr Child Health 49: 554-556 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Spentzas T, Minarik M, Patterts AB, Vinson B, Stidham G (2009) Children with respiratory distress treated with high-flow nasal cannula. J Intensive Care Med 24:323-328 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Roberts CT,Manley BJ, Dawson JA, Davis PG (2014) Nursing perceptions of high-flow nasal cannulae treatment for very preterm infants. J Paediatr Child Health 50: 806-810 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  31. Wilkinson D, Andersen C, O`Donell CP, de Paoli AG, Manely BJ et al. (2016) High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in preterm infants. Cochrane Database SystRev 2016; 2: CD006405 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Roberts CT, Owen LS, Manley BJ, Froisland DH, Donath SM (2016) Nasal high-flow therapy for primary respiratory support in preterm infants. NEJM 375: 1142-1151. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Manley BJ (2016) Nasal high-flow therapy for preterm infants. Review of neonatal trials. Clin Perinatol 43: 673-691 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Reiterer F, Schwaberger B, Freidl T, Schmölzer G, Pichler G et al. (2016) Lung protective ventilatory strategies in intubated preterm infants with RDS. Paediatr Respir Rev Suppl 1: S41-S46 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Reiterer F, Sivieri E, Abbasi S (2015) Evaluation of bedside pulmonary function in the neonate: from the past to the future. Pediatr Pulmonol 50: 1039-1050 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Laughon MM, Smith PB, Bose C (2009) Prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Seminars in Fetal &Neonatal Medicine 14: 374-382