Profile
International Journal of Psychology & Behavior Analysis Volume 1 (2015), Article ID 1:IJPBA-105, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.15344/2455-3867/2015/105
Research Article
Collective Identity and Intergroup Discrimination: Outcomes in Contexts that Emphasize and do not Emphasize Intergroup Relations

John A. Hunter1*, Maurice Stringer2, Mike Banks1, Sarah Kafka1, Genevieve Iversen1, Olivia Scobie1, Quin Hu1, Saleh Moradi1 and Jill Hayhurst1

1Department of Psychology, University of Otago, 362 Leith St, North Dunedin, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand
2Psychology Department, University of Ulster, Cromore Road, Coleraine, Londonderry BT52 1SA, United Kingdom
Dr. John A. Hunter, Psychology Department, University of Otago, Dunedin, PO BOX 56, New Zealand; E-mail: jhunter@psy.otago.ac.nz
05 September 2014; 25 December 2014; 25 January 2015
Hunter JA, Stringer M, Banks M, Kafka S, Iversen G, et al. (2015) Collective Identity and Intergroup Discrimination: Outcomes in Contexts that Emphasize and do not Emphasize Intergroup Relations. Int J Psychol Behav Anal 1: 105. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15344/2455-3867/2015/105

Abstract

Several important theoretical perspectives in intergroup relations predict that there should be a positive association between various form of intergroup discrimination and collective identity. The empirical evidence for this assumption is however inconsistent and contradictory. Some studies show positive associations, some show negative associations and some show fail to find any associations. In an attempt to bring some clarity to this area, we conducted four studies that examined the relationship between collective identity and intergroup discrimination as a function of the intergroup context. Based on ideas derived from Self-Categorization Theory (SCT) it was predicted that the association between collective identity and intergroup discrimination would emerge in contexts where intergroup relations are emphasized. Using a between groups methodology, this prediction was tested in four independent studies. The results indicate a consistently positive relationship between the evaluative dimension of collective identity and various forms of intergroup discrimination. This association is found only in circumstances that specifically emphasize intergroup relations. This relationship held across increasingly negative forms of intergroup discrimination (i.e., trait ratings, the removal of positive resources, and the allocation of white noise).