Graphy Publications
Inspiring Innovations & Discoveries
Journalism and Mass Communication Volume 3 (2016), Article ID 3:IJJMC-122, 7 pages
Research Article
Internet Addiction: An Interpersonal Perspective

Will Wai Kit Ma* and Amy Wu

Online Communication Research Center, Department of Journalism and Communication, Hong Kong Shue Yan University, 10 Wai Tsui Cres, Hong Kong
Journalist, USA Today Network, McLean, VA, USA
Dr. Will Wai Kit Ma, Online Communication Research Center, Department of Journalism and Communication, Hong Kong Shue Yan University, 10 Wai Tsui Cres, Hong Kong; E-mail:
18 June 2016; 27 December 2016; 29 December 2016
Ma WWK, Wu A (2016) Internet Addiction: An Interpersonal Perspective. Int J Journalism Mass Comm 3: 122. doi:


  1. Young KS (1998) Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyber Psychology & Behavior 1: 237-244. View
  2. Young KS (1999) Internet addiction test. View
  3. Seo M, Kang HS, Yom YH (2009) Internet addiction and interpersonal problems in Korean adolescents. Computers Informatics Nursing 27: 226- 233. View
  4. Tsimtsiou Z, Haidich AB, Kokkali S, Dardavesis T, Young KS, et al. (2013) Greek version of the Internet addiction test: A validation study. Psychiatr Quarterly 85: 187-195. View
  5. Baumeister RF, Leary MR (1995) The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psycholo gical Bulletin 117: 497-529. View
  6. McKenna KY, Green AS, Gleason ME (2002) Relationship formation on the Internet: What’s the big attraction? Journal of social issues 58: 9-31. View
  7. eMartketer (2014) 2 billion consumers worldwide to get smart(phones) by 2016. View
  8. Information Services Department (2015). Hong Kong: The Facts- Telecommunication. View
  9. Chang LR (2014) Internet addiction among Taiwanese Youths. Journal of Youth Studies 17: 116-125. View
  10. Lee YH, Ko CH, Chou C (2015) Re-visiting Internet addiction among Taiwanese students: a cross-sectional comparison of students’ expectations, online gaming, and online social interaction. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 43: 589-599. View
  11. Block JJ (2008) Issues for DSM-V: internet addiction. American Journal of Psychiatry 165: 306-307. View
  12. Lin SS, Tsai CC (2002) Sensation seeking and internet dependence of Taiwanese high school adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior 18: 411-426. View
  13. O'reilly T (2007) What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communications Strategies 1: 17. View
  14. Facebook (2015) Stats. View
  15. Laurenceau JP, Barrett LF, Pietromonaco PR (1998) Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. J Pers Soc Psychol 74: 1238-1251. View
  16. Laurenceau JP, Barrett LF, Rovine MJ (2005) The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: A daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach. J Fam Psychol 19: 314-323. View
  17. McKenna KY, Bargh JA (1999) Causes and consequences of social interaction on the Internet: A conceptual framework. Media Psychology 1: 249-269. View
  18. Reis HT, Shaver P (1988) Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In S. Duck, D. Hay, S. E. Hobfoll, W. Iceks, & B. M. Montgomery (Eds.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (pp. 367-389). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
  19. Derlega VJ, Chaikin AL (1977) Privacy and self-disclosure in social relationships. Journal of Social Issues 33: 102-115. View
  20. Hatfield E, Sprecher S (1986) Mirror, mirror… The importance of looks in everyday life. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. View
  21. Newcomb TM (1956) The prediction of interpersonal attraction. American Psychologist 11: 575-86. View
  22. Byrne D (1997) An overview (and underview) of research and theory within the attraction paradigm. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 14: 417-431. View
  23. Baumeister RF (1991) Meanings of life. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  24. Sherif M, Harvey OH, White BJ, Hood WR, Sherif CW (1988) The robbers cave experiment: Intergroup conflict and cooperation. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
  25. Hazan C, Shaver PR (1994) Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychological Inquiry 5: 1-22. View
  26. Sternberg RJ (1986) A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review 93: 119-135. View
  27. Sedikides C, Olsen N, Reis HT (1993) Relationships as natural categories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology4 64: 71-82. View
  28. Lynch JJ (1977) The broken heart: The medical consequences of loneliness. New York, NY: Basic Books. View
  29. Bloom BL, White SW, Asher SJ (1979) Marital disruption as a stressful life event. In G. Levinger & O. C. Moles (Eds.), Divorce and separation: Context, causes, and consequences (pp. 184-200). New York, NY: Basic Books.
  30. Rusbult CE, Van Lange PA (2003) Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology 54: 351-375. View
  31. Rusbult C E, Van Lange PA, Wildschut T, Yovetich NA, Verette J (2000) Perceived superiority in close relationships: Why it exists and persists. J Pers Soc Psychol 79: 521-545. View
  32. Hill CA (1987) Affiliation motivation: People who need people… but in different ways. J Pers Soc Psychol 52: 1008-1018. View
  33. Hill CA (1997) Relationship of expressive affiliative personality dispositions to perceptions of social support. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 19: 133-161. View
  34. Ma WWK, Yuen AH (2011) Understanding online knowledge sharing: An interpersonal relationship perspective. Computers & Education 56: 210- 219. View
  35. Ma WWK, Chan A (2014) Knowledge sharing and social media: Altruism, perceived online attachment motivation, and perceived online relationship commitment. Computers in Human Behavior 39: 51-58. View
  36. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2010) Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson. View
  37. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric Theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  38. Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2014) A primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: Sage. View
  39. Becker JM, Klein K, Wetzels M (2012) Hierarchical Latent Variable Models in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for Using Reflective-Formative Type Models. Long Range Planning 45: 359-394. View
  40. Becker JM, Rai A, Ringle CM, Völckner F (2013) Discovering unobserved heterogeneity in Structural Equation Models to avert validity threats. MIS Quarterly 37: 665-694. View
  41. Cooper ML, Peirce RS, Tidwell MCO (1995) Parental drinking problems and adolescent offspring substance use: Moderating effects of demographic and familial factors. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 9: 36-52. View
  42. Copeland CS, Woods DJ, Hursey KG (1995) Social interaction effects on restrained eating. Int J Eat Disord 17: 97-100. View
  43. Siegal HA, Fisher JH, Rapp RC, Wagner JH, Forney MA, et al. (1995) Presenting problems of substance abusers in treatment: Implications for service delivery and attrition. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 21: 17-26. View
  44. Blumler JG, Katz E (Eds.) (1974) The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.