Profile

New User

New to Graphy Publications? Create an account to get started today.

Registered Users

Have an account? Sign in now.

How to Cite | Author Information | Publication History
International Journal of Journalism and Mass Communication Volume 1 (2014), Article ID 1:IJJMC-101, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.15344/2349-2635/2014/101
Research Article
A Comparative Study of the Legal Frameworks and Protection of Digital Content in the United Arab Emirates and Australia in Relation to the Practice of Blocking Digital Content on the Basis of Location (Geo-Blocking) and its Associated Circumvention Technologies

Bradley John Young

Assistant professor, College of Communication and Media, Zayed University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Dr. Bradley John Young, College of Communication and Media, Zayed University, Abu Dhabi- 144534, United Arab Emirates, Tel: +971 2 5993696; E-mail: bradley.young@zu.ac.ae
18 December 2013; 04 January 2014; 06 January 2014
Young BJ (2014) A Comparative Study of the Legal Frameworks and Protection of Digital Content in the United Arab Emirates and Australia in Relation to the Practice of Blocking Digital Content on the Basis of Location (Geo- Blocking) and its Associated Circumvention Technologies. Int J Journalism Mass Comm 1: 101. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15344/2349-2635/2014/101
© 2014 Young. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

References

  1. Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (Berne Convention) opened for signature 9 September 1886, WO001EN (entered into force 5 December 1887). View
  2. WIPO, Treaties and Contracting Parties: WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT) (2013) WIPO. View
  3. Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (Berne Convention), opened for signature 9 September 1886, WO001EN (entered into force 5 December 1887), art 11.
  4. Internet Society (2011) Perspectives on Policy Responses to Online Copyright Infringement: An Evolving Policy Landscape.
  5. Reynolds GW (2012) Ethics in Information Technology, (4th edition) Cengage Learning, United State of America, 45p. View
  6. Internet Society Copyright Working Group.
  7. Baase S (2012) A Gift of Fire: Social, Legal, and Ethical Issues for Computing and the Internet (4th edition), Pearson Education, 233p. View
  8. Somers v. Apple, Inc., --- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 4712731 (9th Cir, 2013); Tim Hull, 'Apple Clears Suit Over ITunes Song Exclusivity', Courthouse News Service (Pasadena), 3rd September 2013. View
  9. Palfrey J, Zittrain J, Deibert R, Rohozinski R (2008) Access Denied: The Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering, MIT Press. View
  10. Hellberg C, Greene D, Boyes T (2007) Broadband Network Architectures: Designing and Deploying Triple-Play Services, Prentice Hall.
  11. Parsons JJ, Oja D (2013) New Perspectives on Computer Concepts 2013: Comprehensive, Cengage Course Technology, 345 p. View
  12. Rosenau JN, Singh JP (2002) Information Technologies and Global Politics: The Changing Scope of Power and Governance, State University of New York Press, 130 p. View
  13. Cherrayil NK, BYOD brings in plethora of network challenges', Gulf News (Abu Dhabi), 15 June 2013. View
  14. Fitzgerald B et al. (2011) Internet and E-Commerce Law: Technology, Law and Policy, Thomson Reuters Australia. View
  15. Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) s 10(1). View
  16. HH Sheikh Mansour Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, His Highness Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan-The UAE President (17 August 2013) Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan Foundation. View
  17. Aqil Kazim, The United Arab Emirates A.D. 600 to the present: A sociodiscursive transformation in the Arabian Gulf (Gulf Book Centre, 2000) 329; John Anthony, Arab states of the lower gulf: People, politics, petroleum. (Middle East Institute, 1975; Constitution of the United Arab Emirates (as amended 1996) (United Arab Emirates), 2 December 1971.
  18. Young BJ (2005) Evaluating the Integration of Learning Technology at Zayed University, Doctoral Thesis, Griffith University, 5p.
  19. UAE National Media Council, UAE Interact (4 September) UAE Government. View
  20. Young BJ (2005) Evaluating the Integration of Learning Technology at Zayed University, Doctoral Thesis, Griffith University, 8p. View
  21. Glenn HP (2010) Legal Traditions of the World, (4th edition) Oxford University Press, pp184-187. View
  22. Palfrey J, Zittrain J, Deibert R, Rohozinski R (2008) Access Denied: The Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering, MIT Press, 406p. View
  23. Palfrey J, Zittrain J, Deibert R, Rohozinski R (2008) Access Denied: The Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering, MIT Press, 407p.
  24. Palfrey J, Zittrain J, Deibert R, Rohozinski R (2008) Access Denied: The Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering, MIT Press, 408p.
  25. BBC Online, United Arab Emirates will not ban Blackberries (8 October) BBC. View
  26. On Combating Cybercrimes (United Arab Emirates) Federal Decree-Law no. (5) of 2012, Issued on 25 Ramadan 1433 AH Corresponding to 13 August 2012. View
  27. Cybercrime Law (United Arab Emirates) Federal Decree-Law No. (2) of 2006, Issued on Muharam 1427 AH Corresponding to January 2006.
  28. O'Connell N (2013) Developments in the UAE Cyber Crimes Law, 259 Al Tamimi Law Update 1. View
  29. Copyright and Related Rights (Neighboring Rights), IP Regulatory Body, Traditional Cultural Expressions, Utility Models (United Arab Emirates) Ministerial Decision No 411 of 1993, Issued on 1 September 1993.
  30. Dubai Technology, Electronic Commerce & Media Free Zone Law (United Arab Emirates) Law No (1) of 2000, Issued 25 Shawwal 1420AH Corresponding to 31 January 2000. View
  31. Concerning Copyrights and Neighboring Rights (United Arab Emirates) Federal Law No. 7 of 2002, Issued on 1 July 2002.
  32. Concerning the Formation and Protection of the Telecommunication Network for Dubai Internet City (United Arab Emirates} Law No (6) of 2002, Issued on 10 November 2002.
  33. Electronic Transactions and Commerce Law (United Arab Emirates) Law No 2 of 2002, Issued on 30 Thi Al-Qedah 1422 Corresponding to 12 February 2002. View
  34. On Trademarks (United Arab Emirates) Federal Law No. (37) of 1992, amended by Law No 19 of 2000 and Law No 8 of 2002, Issued on 28 September 1992. View
  35. Regarding the Organization of the Telecommunications Sector (United Arab Emirates) Federal Decree-Law No. (3) of 2003, amended by Decree-Law No (5) of 2008, Issued 20 Ramadan 1424H Corresponding to 15 November 2003.
  36. Amending the Dubai Technology, Electronic Commerce and Media Free Zone (United Arab Emirates) Law No 11 of 2004, Issued on 3 Ramadan 1425 Corresponding to 17 October 2004. View
  37. On Collective Management of Copyright and Related Rights (United Arab Emirates) Ministerial Decision No 133 of 2004, Issued on 22 March 2004, Entry into force of original text 23 September 2011.
  38. On Compulsory Licensing of Copies or Translations of Works (United Arab Emirates) Ministerial Decision No 134 of 2004, Issued 22 March 2004, Entry into force of original text 23 September 2011.
  39. Concerning Consumer Protection (United Arab Emirates) Federal Law No 24 of 2006, Issued on 13 August 2006, and Entry into force of original text 23 September 2011.
  40. Cybercrime Law (United Arab Emirates) Federal Decree-Law No. (2) of 2006, Issued on Muharam 1427 AH Corresponding to January 2006.
  41. Pertaining to the Industrial Regulation and Protection of Patents, Industrial Drawings, and Designs (United Arab Emirates) Federal Law No. 31of 2006, Issued on 24 July 2002. View
  42. Data Protection (United Arab Emirates) Data Protection Law No 1 of 2007, amended by Law No 5 of 2012, Issued December 2012.
  43. Regarding the issuance of Certification Service Provider Regulations (United Arab Emirates) Ministerial Resolution No (1) of 2008, Issued 31 December 2008. View
  44. On The Establishment Of The National Electronic Security Authority (United Arab Emirates) Federal Decree-Law No. 3 of 2012, Issued on 25 Ramadan 1433 AH Corresponding to 13 August 2012.
  45. On The Regulation Of Competition (United Arab Emirates) Federal Law No. 4 of 2012, Issued on 24 Dhu al-Qi'dah 1433 AH corresponding to 10 October 2012.
  46. On Combating Cybercrimes (United Arab Emirates) Federal Decree-Law no. (5) of 2012, Issued on 25 Ramadan 1433 AH Corresponding to 13 August 2012. View
  47. Atkinson B (2007) The True History of Copyright: The Australian Experience 1905-2005, Sydney University Press. View
  48. Atkinson B (2007) The True History of Copyright: The Australian Experience 1905-2005, Sydney University Press, 1p.
  49. Atkinson B (2007) The True History of Copyright: The Australian Experience 1905-2005, Sydney University Press, 419p.
  50. Fitzgerald B,Gamertsfelder L(1998) A Conceptual Framework For Protecting the Value of Informational Products through Unjust Enrichment Law. Australian Bar Review 16: 3. View
  51. House of Representatives: Standing Committee on Infrastructure and Communications, 'At what cost? IT pricing and the Australia tax' (Commonwealth of Australia, July 2013) 108; Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) s 10(1). View
  52. House of Representatives: Standing Committee on Infrastructure and Communications, 'At what cost? IT pricing and the Australia tax' (Commonwealth of Australia, July 2013) 108; Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), 115.
  53. House of Representatives: Standing Committee on Infrastructure and Communications, 'At what cost? IT pricing and the Australia tax' (Commonwealth of Australia, July 2013) 108; Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), xiii.
  54. Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (Australia) s 51(3). View
  55. House of Representatives: Standing Committee on Infrastructure and Communications, 'At what cost? IT pricing and the Australia tax' (Commonwealth of Australia, July 2013) 108; Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), 111.
  56. House of Representatives: Standing Committee on Infrastructure and Communications, 'At what cost? IT pricing and the Australia tax' (Commonwealth of Australia, July 2013) 108; Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), 38.
  57. Stevens v, Kabushiki Kaisha Sony Computer Entertainment (2005) 221 ALR 448. View
  58. House of Representatives: Standing Committee on Infrastructure and Communications, 'At what cost? IT pricing and the Australia tax' (Commonwealth of Australia, July 2013) 108; Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), 49.
  59. House of Representatives: Standing Committee on Infrastructure and Communications, 'At what cost? IT pricing and the Australia tax' (Commonwealth of Australia, July 2013) 108; Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), xii.
  60. House of Representatives: Standing Committee on Infrastructure and Communications, 'At what cost? IT pricing and the Australia tax' (Commonwealth of Australia, July 2013) 108; Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), xiii.
  61. House of Representatives: Standing Committee on Infrastructure andCommunications, 'At what cost? IT pricing and the Australia tax' (Commonwealth of Australia, July 2013) 108; Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), 84.
  62. House of Representatives: Standing Committee on Infrastructure and Communications, 'At what cost? IT pricing and the Australia tax' (Commonwealth of Australia, July 2013) 108; Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), xiii.
  63. Digital Economy Act 2010 (UK) c 24, 124G(3). View
  64. Digital Economy Act 2010 (UK) s 17. View
  65. Digital Economy Act 2010 (UK) s 17(7)(a).
  66. Copyright Legislation Amendment (Fair Go for Fair Use) Bill 2013 (Cth). View
  67. Australian Law Reform Commission, Copyright and the Digital Economy- ALRC (2013) Australian Government. View
  68. Australian Law Reform Commission (2012) Copyright and the Digital Economy, Issue Paper No 42. View
  69. Australian Law Reform Commission, Copyright and the Digital Economy, Issue Paper No 42 (2012), 30.
  70. Mendina T, Britz JJ (2004), Information Ethics in the Electronic Age: Current Issues in Africa and the World, McFarland,175p.
  71. Flew T, Suzor N, Liu BR (2013) Copyrights and copyfights: copyright law and the digital economy. Int J Technology Policy and Law, 1: 3. View
  72. Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Limited (No. 3) [2010] FCA 24.
  73. Larrikin Music Publishing Pty Ltd v EMI Songs Australia Pty Ltd (2010) [2010] FCA 29.
  74. Telstra Corporation Ltd v Phone Directories Company Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 44.
  75. Copyright Amendment (Digital Agenda) Act 2000 (Cth) s 112E.
  76. University of New South Wales v Moorhouse And Angus & Robertson (Publishers)Pty Ltd (1975) 6 ALR 193.
  77. Paltiel M (2013) Navigating cyberspace-Australian precedent regarding internet liability, 16(2) Internet Law Bulletins 26. View
  78. Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Ltd [2012] HCA 16.
  79. Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v National Rugby League Investments Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 34.
  80. Hinchliffe S (2012) Time for change? Up and away … storage in a cloud or feet on the ground?, 25(5) Australian Intellectual Property Law Bulletin.
  81. Hinchliffe S (2012) Time for a review of automated programmes and free-toair services: National Rugby League Investments Pty Ltd v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd, FCAFC 59' (2012) 25(1) Australian Intellectual Property Law Bulletin 2.
  82. Vitoria M (2011) Laddie, Prescott and Vitoria: The Modern Law of Copyright and Designs (4th edition) LexisNexis, 913.
  83. Court Suppression and Non-Publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW) s 6.
  84. Fairfax Digital Australia and New Zealand Pty Ltd and Others v Ibrahim and others (2012) 293 ALR 384.
  85. Rinehart v Welker [2011] NSWCA 403.
  86. Seet S, Aplin W (2013) Phonographic Performance Co of Australia Ltd v Commercial Radio Australia Ltd,296 ALR 607. View
  87. Gasser U (2006) Research Publication No. 2006-04: Legal Frameworks and Technological Protection of Digital Content: Moving Forward Towards a Best Practice Model, Harvard Law School: The Berkman Center for Internet & Society.
  88. Gasser U (2006) Research Publication No. 2006-04: Legal Frameworks and Technological Protection of Digital Content: Moving Forward Towards a Best Practice Model, Harvard Law School: The Berkman Center for Internet & Society, 21.
  89. Gasser U (2006) Research Publication No. 2006-04: Legal Frameworks and Technological Protection of Digital Content: Moving Forward Towards a Best Practice Model, Harvard Law School: The Berkman Center for Internet & Society, 42.
  90. Gasser U (2006) Research Publication No. 2006-04: Legal Frameworks and Technological Protection of Digital Content: Moving Forward Towards a Best Practice Model, Harvard Law School: The Berkman Center for Internet & Society, 9.
  91. Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v National Rugby League Investments Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 34.
  92. Ricketson S, Ginsburg J (2006) International Copyright and Neighbouring Rights: The Berne Convention and Beyond (2nd edition) Oxford University Press; Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (Berne Convention), opened for signature 9 September 1886, WO001EN (entered into force 5 December 1887). View
  93. U.S. v Elcom Ltd., 203 F.Supp.2d 1111 (N.D.Cal., 2002).
  94. Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), 112 Stat. 2860 (1998). View
  95. Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement, Australia-United States, signed 18 May 2004, FTA (entered into force 1 January 2005). View
  96. WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty (WPPT), opened for signature 20December 1996, WO033EN (entered into force 20 May 2002).
  97. Copyright Amendment (Digital Agenda) Act 2000 (Cth) (Australia).
  98. Copyright Amendment (Digital Agenda) Act 2000 (Cth) (Australia) s 4, 5.
  99. House of Representatives: Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs, 'Review of technological protection measures exceptions' (Commonwealth of Australia, February 2006).
  100. Gasser U (2006) Research Publication No. 2006-04: Legal Frameworks and Technological Protection of Digital Content: Moving Forward Towards a Best Practice Model, Harvard Law School: The Berkman Center for Internet & Society, 13.
  101. Harpur PD, Suzor N(2013) Copyright Protections and Disability Rights: Turning the Page to a New International Paradigm. University of New South Wales Law Journal 36: 3. View
  102. Strauss A, Corbin JM (2008) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, (2nd edition) Sage Publications. View
  103. Glaser GB, Strauss AL (1979) The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, Transaction Publishers.
  104. Seidel S, Urquhart C (2013) On emergence and forcing in information systems grounded theory studies: the case of Strauss and Corbin. J Inform Technol 28: 237–260. View
  105. Charmaz K (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis SAGE Publications Ltd, 224 p. View
  106. Omar A, Hamid D, Alias N, IslamMd (2010) Grounded Theory: A Short Cut to Highlight a Researchers' Intellectuality (2010) J Social Sci 6: 276-281. View
  107. Lynne Connelly, above n 105.
  108. Hoecke MV (2011) Methodologies of Legal Research: Which Kind of Method for What Kind of Discipline, Hart Publishing. View
  109. Glaser GB, Strauss AL (1979) The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, Transaction Publishers, 103p.
  110. StraussA, Corbin J (1990) Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques, Sage Publication LTD, 116.
  111. Guba EG, Lincoln YS (1989) Fourth generation evaluation, SAGE Publications, Inc, 213p. View
  112. Delice A (2010) The Sampling Issues in Quantitative Research. Educational Sciences Theory & Practice 10: 2001-2018. View
  113. Convention on Cybercrime (Budapest Convention on Cybercrime), opened for signature 23 November 2001, CETS No. 185 (entered into force 1 July 2004).
  114. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Copyright Treaty (WCT), opened for signature 20 December 1996, WO033EN (entered into force 6 March 2002; WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty (WPPT), opened for signature 20 December 1996, WO033EN (entered into force 20 May 2002)
  115. Bazeley, Jackson K (2013) Qualitative data analysis with NVivo,(2nd edition) SAGE Publications Ltd, 328 p. View
  116. Statement of Mr. Samuel L. Clemens, Arguments Before The Committees On Patents of the Senate and House of Representatives, On The Bills S. 6330 and H.R. 19853, To Amend and Consolidate the Acts Respecting Copyright, December 7-11, 1906.
  117. Murray A (2002) Ficsor: The Law of Copyright and the Internet: The 1996 Wipo Treaties, Their Interpretation and Implementation, Oxford University Press, 10p. View
  118. Tom Mendina and Johannes J. Britz, above n 71, 177. View
  119. Gasser U (2006) Research Publication No. 2006-04: Legal Frameworks and Technological Protection of Digital Content: Moving Forward Towards a Best Practice Model, Harvard Law School: The Berkman Center for Internet & Society, 41.
  120. Gasser U (2006) Research Publication No. 2006-04: Legal Frameworks and Technological Protection of Digital Content: Moving Forward Towards a Best Practice Model, Harvard Law School: The Berkman Center for Internet & Society, 46.
  121. Gasser U (2006) Research Publication No. 2006-04: Legal Frameworks and Technological Protection of Digital Content: Moving Forward Towards a Best Practice Model, Harvard Law School: The Berkman Center for Internet & Society, 47.
  122. Gasser U (2006) Research Publication No. 2006-04: Legal Frameworks and Technological Protection of Digital Content: Moving Forward Towards a Best Practice Model, Harvard Law School: The Berkman Center for Internet & Society, 48.
  123. Stevens’s v Kabushiki Kaisha Sony Computer Entertainment and Others (2005) 221 ALR 448, 489.
  124. Interactive Games and Entertainment Association, Submission No 14 to Senate Standing Committees on Environment and Communications, Copyright Legislation Amendment (Fair Go for Fair Use) Bill 2013, 30 August 2013.
  125. Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement, Australia-United States, signed 18 May 2004, FTA (entered into force 1 January 2005).
  126. Interactive Games and Entertainment Association, Submission No 14 to Senate Standing Committees on Environment and Communications, Copyright Legislation Amendment (Fair Go for Fair Use) Bill 2013, 30 August 2013, 4.
  127. Interactive Games and Entertainment Association, Submission No 14 to Senate Standing Committees on Environment and Communications, Copyright Legislation Amendment (Fair Go for Fair Use) Bill 2013, 30 August 2013, 6.
  128. Australian Recording Industry Association (ARIA), Submission No 15 to Senate Standing Committees on Environment and Communications, Copyright Legislation Amendment (Fair Go for Fair Use) Bill 2013, 30 August 2013.
  129. Australian Law Reform Commission, Copyright and the Digital Economy, Issue Paper No 42 (2012), 30.
  130. Gasser U (2006) Research Publication No. 2006-04: Legal Frameworks and Technological Protection of Digital Content: Moving Forward Towards a Best Practice Model, Harvard Law School: The Berkman Center for Internet & Society, 41.
  131. Convention on Cybercrime (Budapest Convention on Cybercrime), opened for signature 23 November 2001, CETS No. 185 (entered into force 1 July 2004).
  132. Maurushat A (2011) Australia's Accession to the Cybercrime Convention: Is the Convention Still Relevant in Combating Cybercrime in the Era of Botnets and Obfuscation Crime Tools?. University of New South Wales Law Journal 33: 431-473. View
  133. John Hilvert, Could geo-blocking be deemed anti- competitive? (26 March) itnews for Australian Business. View
  134. Hilvert J, Could geo-blocking be deemed anti- competitive? (26 March) itnews for Australian Business View
  135. Suzor N (2004) Privacy v IP Litigation: preliminary third party discovery on the Internet. Australian Bar Review 25: 228. View
  136. Privacy Amendment (Enhancing Privacy Protection) Act 2012 (Cth) sch 1 cl 8.
  137. Kalinich K (2013) Data sovereignty and the cloud-a lawyer’s guide: legal and risk governance issues around data hosting and jurisdiction. Internet Law Bulletin. View
  138. On Issuance of The Penal Code (United Arab Emirates) Federal Law No (3) of 1987, Issued on 16 Raby` al-THaany 1408 A.H. Corresponding to 8 December 1987.
  139. On Issuance of The Penal Code (United Arab Emirates) Federal Law No (3) of 1987, Issued on 16 Raby` al-THaany 1408 A.H. Corresponding to 8 December 1987, art 378.
  140. O' Connell N (2013) Legal Issues in Cloud Computing-Part, 2013(1) Law Update 1.
  141. On Issuance of The Penal Code (United Arab Emirates) Federal Law No (3) of 1987, Issued on 16 Raby` al-THaany 1408 A.H. Corresponding to 8 December 1987 art 158.
  142. Suzor N (22 July 2013) Statements from: The beginning of the end for geoblocking?, Business Spectator. View
  143. Lohman T, Geoblocking in Australia to be dismantled (29 July) ZDNET. View
  144. Mott WT ((1975) The Rhetoric of Martin Luther King, Jr.: Letter from Birmingham Jail. Phylon 36:417. View
  145. Black J, Roberts C (2011)Doing Ethics in Media: Theories and Practical Applications, Taylor & Francis, 456 p. View
  146. Gasser U (2006) Research Publication No. 2006-04: Legal Frameworks and Technological Protection of Digital Content: Moving Forward Towards a Best Practice Model, Harvard Law School: The Berkman Center for Internet & Society, 8.
  147. Paine A (1935), Mark Twain's Notebook: Journal Entries 1865-1908, Harper & Brothers, From Chapter 33 - Back in America, 381p. View
Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, Safari, Above IE 9.0 version
Privacy Policy | Copyright & Permissions
Copyright © 2013-2024 Graphy Publications, All Rights Reserved.