Profile

New User

New to Graphy Publications? Create an account to get started today.

Registered Users

Have an account? Sign in now.

How to Cite | Author Information | Publication History
International Journal of Clinical & Medical Microbiology Volume 1 (2016), Article ID 1:IJCMM-117, 5 pages
https://doi.org/10.15344/2456-4028/2016/117
Research Article
Evolution of the Microbial Community During Traditional Fermentation of Globe Artichoke Immature Inflorescence

Spiros Paramithiotis1*, Agapi I. Doulgeraki2, Alexandra Vrelli1, George-John E. Nychas2 and Eleftherios H. Drosinos1

1Laboratory of Food Quality Control and Hygiene, Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Agricultural University of Athens
2Laboratory of Microbiology and Biotechnology of Foods, Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Agricultural University of Athens
Dr. Spiros Paramithiotis, Laboratory of Food Quality Control and Hygiene, Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Agricultural University of Athens, Greece; E-mail: sdp@aua.gr
26 July 2016; 17 December 2016; 19 December 2016
Paramithiotis S, Doulgeraki AI, Vrelli A, Nychas GJE, Drosinos EH (2016) Laboratory of Food Quality Control and Hygiene, Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Agricultural University of Athens. Int J Clin Med Microbiol 1: 117. doi: https://doi.org/10.15344/2456-4028/2016/117
© 2016 Paramithiotis et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Background: The aim of the present study was the monitoring of the spontaneous fermentation of globe artichoke immature inflorescence- based on a traditional procedure originating from southern Greece.
Methods: Artichokes were peeled, cut and submerged in a brine solution (8%) containing lemon juice. After blanching, they were placed in fresh brine (8% w/v NaCl) at room temperature. Fermentation process was monitored by measuring pH and total titratable acidity (TTA) values as well as by qualitative and quantitative assessment of the microbiota. The microbiota differentiation was performed after the cumulative analysis of whole cell proteins (SDS-PAGE) and genotypic profiles (RAPD-PCR) while a culture independent approach (PCR-DGGE) was also applied.Identification was carried out by sequencing of the 26S-rRNA gene.
Results: The initial pH and TTA (mL NaOH 0.1N) values were 3.4 and 4.25 whereas at the final day of fermentation (26th day) they were 4.5 and 5.9, respectively. Yeasts, and more accurately Hanseniaspora sp. dominated the fermentation; their population increased to 6.7 log CFUg-1 and dominated the yeast biota.
Conclusion: An insight into the unique spontaneous fermentation of globe artichoke immature inflorescence has been offered.


1. Introduction

Globe artichoke (Cynaracardunculus var. scolymus L. Fiori) is a perennial plant belonging to the Asteraceae family native to the Mediterranean Basin [1,2]. The edible part is the immature inflorescence that is consumed raw or after some type of thermal treatment. From a nutritional point of view, it is considered as very healthy and nutritious [3,4]. It is a rich source of minerals [5], vitamin C [6], inulin [7] as well as polyphenols [8]. The effect of processing steps on the phytochemical content has also been studied to some extent; an increase of protein and total phenolic content as well as a decrease of dietary fiber content, as a result of boiling, has been reported [9-11]. Fermentation, on the other hand, seems to be an ideal processing step as it increases the level of safety [12,13], improves organoleptic properties [14], enhances nutritional value [15,16] and extends shelf life [17].

Spontaneous fermentation of artichoke immature inflorescence is not that common and therefore no reports in the literature currently exist, at least to our knowledge. Given the nutritional value of artichoke itself and the benefits that fermentation might confer, this type of product is worth studying. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to monitor the physicochemical changes as well as the microbial succession during spontaneous fermentation of artichoke immature inflorescence, by both culture dependent and independent techniques and to taxonomically characterize the dominant microbiota.

2. Material and Methods

2.1 Pickle preparation and sampling

Artichoke fermentation was performed according to a traditional recipe that is used in southern Greece. Immature inflorescences were peeled, cut and submerged into brine solution (8% w/v NaCl) containing lemon juice (one lemon, i.e. 25 mL juice per liter of brine). Blanching at boiling water for 1.5 min took place in the same brine. Then, artichoke pieces were drained and submerged into a new brine solution (8% w/v NaCl) without lemon juice. Olive oil was added on top and left for fermentation for about 26 days at room temperature (20°C). The microbiological quality of the bracts as well as the immature inflorescence before and after treatment with lemon juice and blanching was assessed. During fermentation, brine samples were taken at 0, 1st, 3rd, 5th, 7th, 12th, 19th and 26th day of fermentation. Fermentation was performed twice and the average values are presented.

2.2 Physico-chemical and microbiological analyses

Fermentation was monitored by measuring pH value and total titratable acidity (TTA) in brine samples. Samples (10 g) were aseptically derived from each fermentation jar, and after the pH value was recorded (WTW, Weilheim, Germany) they were homogenized with 90 mL of distilled water using a Stomacher apparatus (Seward, London, UK). The acidity was titrated using 0.1 N NaOH to final pH 8.5. The TTA was expressed in mL NaOH to final pH 8.5. All analyses were performed in triplicate and the average values are presented.

Microbiological analyses were performed in brine samples. Total aerobic mesophilic count, yeasts-molds, lactic acid bacteria, Staphylococcusaureus, enterococci, Bacillus cereus, sulphur-reducing clostridia, Enterobacteriaceae, coliforms and E. coli as well as qualitative and quantitative determination of Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella were performed according to Paramithiotis et al [18]. More accurately, the pour plating technique was applied for the enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae, coliforms and E. coli. The first was carried out in Violet Red Bile Glucose Agar (VRBGA) (LAB M, Lancashire, UK) and incubation at 37°C for 24 h. Enumeration of coliforms and Escherichia coli was performed in Chromocult coliform agar (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and incubation at 37°C for 24 h. The surface spreading technique was performed for the enumeration of total aerobic mesophilic count, yeasts-molds, lactic acid bacteria, Staphylococcusaureus, enterococci, Bacillus cereus as well as Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonellasp. Total aerobic mesophilic count was enumerated on Plate Count Agar (PCA) (LAB M) and incubation at 30°C for 48 h, yeasts-molds on Rose Bengal Chloramphenicol Agar (RBCA) (LAB M) and incubation at 25 oC for 4 d, lactic acid bacteria on de Man, Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) (LAB M) and incubation at 30 oC for 48 h, Staphylococcusaureus on Baird-Parker Agar (BPA) (LAB M) and incubation at 37°C for 24-48 h, enterococci on Kanamycin AesculinAzide Agar (KAAA) (LAB M) and incubation at 37 oC for 24 h, Bacillus cereus on Cereus selective agar (Merck) and incubation at 30°C for 24 h, Listeria monocytogenes on Listeria Chromogenic Agar (LAB M) and incubation at 37°C for 24 h, Salmonella sp. on Xylose Lysine Deoxycholate (XLD) (LAB M) and incubation at 37 oC for 24 h. Sulphur-reducing clostridia were determined by pouring 10 mL aliquots in 20 mL of molten Sulfite Polymyxin Sulfadiazine Agar (SPSA) (Merck) and incubation at 37°C for 24 h. Finally, qualitative determination of Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella sp. was performed according to EN ISO 11290-1 [19] and ISO 6579: 2002 [20], respectively. All analyses were performed in duplicate and the average values are presented.

2.3 Culture-dependent enumeration, isolation and identification of yeasts

From each sample, all colonies present in the final dilution were selected and isolated. Isolated strains were purified by successive subculturing on Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) agar (LAB M). Extraction and analysis of whole cell proteins by Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate – Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) was performed according to Paramithiotis et al. [21]. Additionally, the extracted DNA [22], from the same isolates was subjected to Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA – Polymerase Chain Reaction (RAPD-PCR).

RAPD-PCR was performed in 25 μL volume containing 0.2 mMdNTPs (Peqlab, Erlangen, Germany), 2.5 mM MgCl2, 4 μΜ primer M13 (5’-GAG GGT GGC GGT TCT-3’) and 2 U Taq polymerase (Biotools, Madrid, Spain). Thermocycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95°C for 2 min; 35 cycles of 95°C for 1 min, 38°C for 1 min ramp to 72°C at 0.6°C/sec, 72oC for 2 min and a final extension step at 72°C for 10 min. DNA fragments were separated by electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gel in 1.0x Tris- Acetic acid-EDTA (TAE) at 100V for 1.5 h, visualized by ethidium bromide staining and photographed using a GelDoc system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Conversion, normalization and further analysis were performed with Bionumerics software (Applied Maths NV, Sint- Martens-Latem, Belgium) using the Dice coefficient and Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA) cluster analysis.

Three representative strains from each cluster were subjected to sequencing of the D1/D2 region of 26S-rRNA gene according to Paramithiotis et al. [22] for species identification. PCR amplification products were sent to a commercial facility for sequencing, and the results were aligned with those in GenBank using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) program to determine the closest known relatives based on the partial 26S-rRNA gene sequence.

2.4 Culture-independent assessment of microbiota

The culture independent assessment of the microbiota was performed with Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE) as follows: fifty milliliters of the first decimal dilution were centrifuged and DNA was extracted as previously described [22]. The approximately 250 nucleotides of the 5’ end of the 26 rRNA gene were amplified by PCR in a final volume of 50 μL containing 2.0 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mMdNTPs (Biotools), 0.3 μΜ primer NL1 (5’-GCC ATA TCA ATA AGC GGA GGA AAA G-3’) with a GC clamp (5’- CGC CCG CCG CGC GCG GCG GGC GGG GCG GGG-3’) attached to the 5’ end, 0.3 μΜ primer LS2 (5’-ATT CCC AAA CAA CTC GAC TC-3’) and 2 U Taq polymerase (Biotools). Thermocycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 min, 40 cycles of 94OC for 30 sec, 52°C for 30 sec, 72OC for 2 min and a final extension step at 72°C for 10 min. Separation of the PCR products took place using the Dcode Universal Mutation Detection System (Bio-Rad) with 8% (w/v) polyacrylamide gel containing urea-formamide (Applichem, Darmstadt, Germany) as denaturing agents in a concentration gradient from 30-60% in TAE buffer (40 mMTris-acetate, 2 mM Na2EDTA H2O, pH 8.5). Electrophoresis was performed at 50 V for 10 min and then 200 V for 4 hours. Then, gels were visualized by ethidium bromide staining and photographed using a GelDoc system (Bio-Rad). Species identification was performed by comigration with reference patterns.

3. Results and Discussion

Microbiological analysis of the artichoke’s bracts, before any treatment, revealed absence of lactic acid bacteria, enterococci, sulphur-reducing clostridia, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella sp., Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus cereus and presence of Enterobacteriaceae at 4.30 logCFU g-1, coliforms at 3.74log CFU g-1 and yeasts-molds at 4.89 log CFU g-1. Similarly, immature inflorescencecontained,before any treatment, 2.23log CFU g-1 Enterobacteriaceae, 2.08log CFU g-1 coliforms and 4log CFU g-1 yeasts-molds. These results are in agreement with Harris [23] who stated that the microbiota of fresh vegetables is dominated by Gram negative aerobic bacteria and yeasts.

After treatment with lemon juice and blanching, all microorganisms were below enumeration limit. Immersion in lemon juice solution is a usual practice at household level when cooking artichokes. Practically, this is employed to prevent browning, which occurs mainly due to the anti-browning effect of citric acid [24]. Blanching, on the other hand, generally results in the inactivation of enzymes, softening of the structure, modification of certain mechanical properties as well as prevention of discoloration or development of unpleasant taste [25]; for some vegetables, however, (e.g. peppers, leeks, and parsley) it is recommended that blanching is avoided [26]. The time of blanching is very important as it significantly affects the loss of antioxidant properties and phenolic content in selected cruciferous vegetables [25]. However, the 1.5 min blanching that took place in the present study can be considered as minimal and, at the same time, seemed to be effective since no discoloration phenomena were observed. From a microbiological point of view, lemon juice is a common sanitizer at household level. It has been reported that 6.7% of lemon juice is the minimum bactericidal concentration against E. coli strains in tryptic soy broth [27]. On the other hand, it has been reported that blanching of whole pickling cucumbers for 15 s at 80°C reduced microbial cell counts by 2 to 3 log cycles from an initial population of typically 6log CFU g-1 [28]. Similarly, in the present study, a 4-log reduction of yeasts-molds population and a 2-log reduction of Enterobacteriaceae population were evident and can be assigned to the combined effect of lemon juice and blanching. In Table 1, total aerobic mesophilic and yeast/mould counts during fermentation, is presented. Yeasts/ moulds prevailed spontaneous fermentation of artichoke immature inflorescence reaching a final population of 5.73 log CFU mL-1 after 12 days and remained stable until the end of fermentation. All other microbial populations were below enumeration limit throughout the fermentation procedure. The initial pH and TTA values were 3.4 and 4.25, respectively. The pH value increased to 4.75 after 3 days and remained between 4.44–4.90 until the end of fermentation (Table 1). Similarly, TTA value gradually increased to 5.9 after 7 days and remained stable until the end of fermentation (Table1). The acidic initial pH and increased TTA values of the brine can be assigned to the initial processing steps of the artichoke immature inflorescence, i.e. the immersion into brine solution containing lemon juice and blanching. During these steps citric acid has penetrated the tissue and then released into the brine, affecting both pH and TTA values. Increase of the pH and TTA values during the first three and seven days of fermentation, respectively, can be assigned both to physiological phenomena related to the artichoke immature inflorescence and to the yeast metabolism. More accurately, damage of the membrane integrity during initial processing can be held responsible for release of plant cellular material into the brine. Part of this, such as ammonium ions and pectins, may act as proton scavengers that lead to increase of the pH value and part of this, such as carboxyl compounds, may result in the increase of TTA. In the former case, pH equilibrium has reached after three days at 4.75, the pK value of the second carboxyl group of citric acid and of acetic acid, a metabolite produced by the yeasts. Equilibrium has reached at this value due to the availability of both acids. Since TTA increase coincided with the increase of the yeast population, it may be primarily assigned to the yeast metabolism and secondarily to compounds released from the immature artichoke inflorescence due to the action of the brine, despite the negative effect of the proton scavenging on TTA value.

table 1
Table 1: Physicochemical and microbiological changes during spontaneous fermentation of immature inflorescence of Cynaracardunculus.

Α total of 145 colonies were isolated throughout the fermentation process and subjected to SDS-PAGE and RAPD-PCR for their differentiation; identical whole-cell protein patterns as well as genotypic profiles, as depicted by RAPD-PCR, were observed. The dendrogram obtained after the cumulative analysis of the different patterns, revealed a remarkable uniformity among them (Figure 1). Both techniques have been effectively used in clustering and differentiation between a variety of yeasts [21,29]. The resemblance between both whole-cell protein and genotypic patterns suggests, at least, a very close relationship between the isolates. Three representative isolates (namely A55, A71 and A126) were randomly selected and subjected to sequencing of the 26S rRNA gene for their identification. Alignment with the respective sequences of identified yeasts in the GenBank database revealed that the closest relatives of all three sequences belonged to Hanseniasporauvarum species; more accurately, the closest relatives of A55, A71 and A126 were sequences JX423559, HM854034 and JQ678687, respectively. However, since H. uvarum, H. meyeri, H. clermontiae, H. lachancei, H. opuntiae and H. guilliermondii are closely related species, analysis of the D1/D2 region of 26S-rRNA gene sequences was not adequate for reliable differentiation between them [30]. Therefore, the strains isolated from the present study are referred to as Hanseniaspora sp.

figure 1
Figure 1: Cluster analysis of RAPD-PCR and SDS-PAGE of whole cell protein patterns of a representative number of yeast strains isolated during spontaneous fermentation of immature inflorescence of Cynaracardunculus. Fermentation jar is designated by letters A and B. The fermentation day is designated by the first Arabic numerals (3, 5, 7, 12, 19 and 26) followed by the isolate number.

Application of the culture-independent approach verified the above result, at least as far as uniformity was concerned.Presence of a single band in DGGE profile, in both fermentation jars, throughout the fermentation process was evident,whereas only in the first lane, i.e. the first fermentation jar in the third day of fermentation; a second band was present (Figure 2). In the first case, comigration with strains A55 and A71 verified presence of the Hanseniaspora genus throughout the fermentation procedure. Regarding the second band present in the third day of fermentation, it was considered of minor importance and therefore identification was not performed. PCRDGGE has been successfully used for the assessment of yeast microcommunity structure and dynamics in raw milk [31], fermented meat [32] and grape must fermentation [33]. Application of both culture-dependent and independent approaches takes place when an integrated assessment of a microbial ecosystem is the case. In the present study, dominance of Hanseniaspora sp. throughout the spontaneous fermentation was suggested by both approaches. Since the same domain of 26S-rRNA gene was used for sequencing and PCR-DGGE analyses, the latter was not able to differentiate between the closely related Hanseniaspora species.

figure 2
Figure 2: PCR-DGGE profiles of brine samples during fermentation of immature inflorescence of Cynaracardunculus. Sampling time (days) as well as fermentation jar (A or B) is indicated at the top of each lane. Strains A55 and A71 were classified as Hanseniaspora sp. on the basis of their sequence of the D1/D2 domain of 26S-rRNA.

The genus Hanseniaspora has been reported to participate in the microbial community of a variety of spontaneously fermented products such as black table olives [34], cider [35], cocoa bean [36], strawberry tree fruit [37], lafun[38] and grape must [39]. Moreover, in the latter case, dominance of H. uvarum during the initial stages is very often reported as well as persistence throughout fermentation [40].

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


References

  1. Lombardo S, Pandino G, Mauromicale G, Knodler M, Carle R, et al. (2010) Influence of genotype, harvest time and plant part on polyphenolic composition of globe artichoke [Cynaracardunculus L. var. scolymus (L.) Fiori. Food Chem 119: 1175-1181 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. De Falco B, Incerti G, Amato M, Lanzotti V (2015) Artichoke: botanical, agronomical, phytochemical, and pharmacological overview. Phytochem Rev 14: 993-1018 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Melilli MG, Tringali S, Bognanni R, Argento S, Calderaro P, et al. (2014) Nutritional quality of globe artichoke [Cynaracardunculus L. subsp. scolymus (L.) Hegi] head as affected by genotype and environment of cultivation. Acta Hortic 1040: 187-192 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dosi R, Daniele A, Guida V, Ferrara L, Severino V and Di Maro A (2013) Nutritional and metabolic profiling of the globe artichoke (Cynarascolymus L. cv. capuanella heads) in province of Caserta, Italy. Aust J Crop Sci 7: 1927-1934 [Google Scholar]
  5. Romani A, Pinelli P, Cantini C, Cimato A, Heimler D (2006) Characterization of Violetto di Toscana a typical Italian variety of artichoke (Cynarascolymus L.). Food Chem 95: 221-225 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gil-Izquierdo A, Gil MI, Conesa MA, Ferreres F (2001) The effects of storage temperatures on vitamin C and phenolic content of artichoke (Cynarascolymus L.) heads. Innov Food Sci Emerg 2: 199-202 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lattanzio V, Kroon PA, Linsalata V, Cardinali A (2009) Globe artichoke: a functional food and source of nutraceutical ingredients. J Funct Foods 1: 131-144 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brat P, Georgé S, Bellamy A, Du Chaffaut L, Scalbert A, et al. (2006) Daily polyphenol intake in France from fruit and vegetables. J Nutr 136: 2368- 2373 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Lutz M, Henriquez C and Escobar M (2011) Chemical composition and antioxidant properties of mature and baby artichokes (Cynarascolymus L.), raw and cooked. J Food Compos Anal 24: 49-54 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Llorach R, Espín JC, Tomás-Barberán FA, Ferreres F (2002) Artichoke (Cynara scolymus L.) byproducts as a potential source of health-promoting antioxidant phenolics. J Agric Food Chem 50: 3458-3464 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Puupponen-Pimia R, Hakkinen S, Aarni M, Suortti T, Lampi A, et al. (2003) Blanching and long-term freezing affect various bioactive compounds of vegetables in different ways. J Agric Food Chem 83: 1389-1402 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mylona AE, Del Fresno JM1, Palomero F1, Loira I1, Bañuelos MA1, et al. (2016) Use of Schizosaccharomyces strains for wine fermentation-Effect on the wine composition and food safety. Int J Food Microbiol 232: 63-72 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Jagannath A (2016) Safety of lactic acid fermented vegetables. In:Paramithiotis S (Ed) Lactic Acid Fermentation of Fruits and Vegetables, CRC Press, USA, pp. 53-64
  14. Paramithiotis S, Papoutsis G andDrosinos EH(2016) Lactic acid fermentation of fruits and vegetables; an overview In: S. Paramithiotis (ed.). Lactic Acid Fermentation of Fruits and Vegetables, CRC Science, USA, pp. 1-18
  15. Swain MR and Ray RC (2016) Nutritional values and bioactive compounds in lactic acid fermented vegetables and fruits. In:Paramithiotis S (Ed) Lactic Acid Fermentation of Fruits and Vegetables, CRC Press, USA, pp. 37-52
  16. Salvador EM, Steenkamp V and McCrindle CME (2014) Production, consumption and nutritional value of cassava (Manihotesculenta, Crantz) in Mozambique: An overview. J Agric Biotech Sustain Dev 6: 29-38 [Google Scholar]
  17. Drosinos EHandParamithiotis S (2007) Trendsinlacticacidfermentation. In PalivoMV (Ed) Food Microbiology Research Trends, Nova Publishers, USA, pp. 39-92
  18. Paramithiotis S, Hondrodimou OL, Drosinos EH (2010) Development of the microbial community during spontaneous cauliflower fermentation. Food Res Int 43: 1098-1103 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1996) Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs - Horizontal method for the detection and enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes - Part 1: Detection Method. Geneva, Switzerland
  20. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2002) Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs - Horizontal method for the detection of Salmonella spp. Geneva, Switzerland
  21. Paramithiotis S, Müller MRA, Ehrmann MA, Tsakalidou E, Seiler H, et al. (2000) Polyphasic identification of wild yeast strains isolated from Greek sourdoughs. Syst Appl Microbiol 23: 156-164 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Paramithiotis S, Tsiasiotou S and Drosinos EH (2010) Comparative study of spontaneously fermented sourdoughs originating from two regions of Greece; Peloponnesus and Thessaly. Eur Food Res Technol 231: 883-890 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Harris LJ (1998) The microbiology of vegetable fermentations. In: Wood BJB (ed) Microbiology of fermented foods, Blackie Academic and Professional, UK, pp 45-72
  24. Amodio ML, Cabezas-Serrano AB, Peri GandColelli G (2011) Post-cutting quality changes of fresh-cut artichokes treated with different anti-browning agents as evaluated by image analysis. Postharvest Biol Tec 62: 213-220 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Amin I, Lee WY (2005) Effect of different blanching times on antioxidant properties in selected cruciferous vegetables. J Sci Food Agric 85: 2314- 2320 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Roberts TA, Cordier J-L, Gram L, Tompkin RB, Pitt JI, Gorris LGMand Swanson KMJ (2005) Vegetables and vegetable products. In: RobertsTA, CordierJ-L, GramL, TompkinRB, PittJI, GorrisLGM and Swanson KMJ(Eds.) Microorganisms in foods 6, Microbial ecology of food commodities, Springer, USA, pp 277-325
  27. Vijayakumar C,Wolf-Hall CE (2002) Minimum bacteriostatic and bactericidal concentrations of household sanitizers for Escherichia coli strains in tryptic soy broth. Food Microbiol 19: 383-388 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Breidt F, Hayes JS, FlemingHP (2000) Reduction of microflora of whole pickling cucumbers by blanching. J Food Sc 65: 1354-1358 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Andrade MJ, Rodríguez M, Sánchez B, Aranda E, Córdoba JJ (2006) DNA typing methods for differentiation of yeasts related to dry-cured meat products. Int J Food Microbiol 107: 48-58 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Cadez N, Poot GA, Raspor P, Smith MT (2003) Hanseniaspora meyeri sp. nov., Hanseniaspora clermontiae sp. nov., Hanseniaspora lachancei sp. nov. and Hanseniaspora opuntiae sp. nov., novel apiculate yeast species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53: 1671-1680 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  31. Cocolin L, Aggio D, Manzano M, Cantoni C, Comi G (2002) An application of PCR-DGGE analysis to profile the yeast populations in raw milk. Int Dairy J 12: 407-411 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Silvestri G, Santarelli S, Aquilanti L, Beccaceci A, Osimani A, et al. (2007) Investigation of the microbial ecology of Ciauscolo, a traditional Italian salami, by culture-dependent techniques and PCR-DGGE. Meat Sci 77: 413-423 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Nisiotou AA, Spiropoulos AE, Nychas GJ (2007) Yeast community structures and dynamics in healthy and Botrytis-affected grape must fermentations. Appl Environ Microbiol 73: 6705-6713 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Arroyo-López FN, Durán-Quintana MC, Ruiz-Barba JL, Querol A, Garrido- Fernández A (2006) Use of molecular methods for the identification of yeast associated with table olives. Food Microbiol 23: 791-796 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Pando Bedriñana R, Querol Simón A, Suárez Valles B (2010) Genetic and phenotypic diversity of autochthonous cider yeasts in a cellar from Asturias. Food Microbiol 27: 503-508 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. de Melo Pereira GV, Magalhães KT, de Almeida EG, da Silva Coelho I, Schwan RF (2013) Spontaneous cocoa bean fermentation carried out in a novel-design stainless steel tank: influence on the dynamics of microbial populations and physical-chemical properties. Int J Food Microbiol161:121-133 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Espirito Santo D, Galego L, Goncalves T, Quintas C (2012) Yeast diversity in the Mediterranean strawberry tree (Arbutus unedo L.) fruits’ fermentations. Food Res Int 47: 45-50 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wilfrid Padonou S, Nielsen DS, Hounhouigan JD, Thorsen L, Nago MC, et al. (2009) The microbiota of Lafun, an African traditional cassava food product. Int J Food Microbiol 133: 22-30 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  39. Fleet GH (2003) Yeast interactions and wine flavour. Int J Food Microbiol 86: 11-22 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. Rantsiou K, Campolongo S, Alessandria V, Rolle L, Torchio F, et al. (2013) Yeast populations associated with grapes during withering and their fate alcoholic fermentation of high-sugar must. Aust J Grape Wine Res 19: 40- 46 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, Safari, Above IE 9.0 version
Privacy Policy | Copyright & Permissions
Copyright © 2013-2024 Graphy Publications, All Rights Reserved.