Profile
International Journal of Community & Family Medicine Volume 2 (2017), Article ID 2:IJCFM-128, 3 pages
https://doi.org/10.15344/2456-3498/2017/128
Original Article
Residents Satisfaction with Training Environment of Saudi Diploma of Family Medicine, Saudi Arabia

Yahia M Al-Khaldi1*, Kassim M Al-Dawwod2, Basima K Al-Khudeer3 and Abdullah A Al-Saqqaf4

1Joint Program of Family Medicine, Aseer Region, Saudi Arabia
2Department of Family & Community Medicine, Dammam University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
3Postgraduate Center, Ministry Of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
4Joint Program of Family Medicine, Jeddah Region, Saudi Arabia
Yahia M Al-Khaldi, Joint Program of Family Medicine, Aseer Region, Saudi Arabia; E-mail: yahiammh@hotmail.com
02 February 2017; 04 May 2017; 06 May 2017
Al-Khaldi YM, Al-Dawwod KM, Al-Khudeer BK, Al-Saqqaf AA (2017) Residents Satisfaction with Training Environment of Saudi Diploma of Family Medicine, Saudi Arabia. Int J Community Fam Med 2: 128. doi: https://doi.org/10.15344/2456-3498/2017/128

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the satisfaction of trainees regarding training environment to implement SDFM program in Saudi Arabia.
Methodology: This cross-sectional study was conducted in February 2015 among trainees of Saudi Diploma Family Medicine (SDFM). After the approval of this study by the regional research ethical committee in Aseer region, Saudi Arabia, the questionnaire was distributed to all trainees who attended the final written examination in four examination Centers in Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire consisted of two parts; the first part included personal data of trainees, the second part was about satisfaction with infrastructures (17 items), and administrative aspect of training program (13 items). Satisfaction was assessed using likert scale of five points (5 =very satisfied and 1=unsatisfied at all). Data of the questionnaire was managed by SPSS version 15.
Results: The total participant in this study was 97 trainees, mean age was 34 year, majority were Saudis. Satisfaction was high for many items such adequate and equipped clinics (90-100%, well equipped laboratory (85%), medical records (84%), and clinical guidelines (81%).Most of aspects scored high points as more than 80% of participants were satisfied .On other hand, 28% were unsatisfied about training plan, 23% were unsatisfied with teamwork, 22% were unsatisfied with availability of job description for trainees and 21% were unsatisfied regarding communication with program directors.
Conclusion: SDFM program seems to have a satisfactory educational resources and administrative backgrounds. Certain issues with less satisfaction scores need additional attention especially during reaccreditation process .Future evaluations of the program may wish to address the extent to which the findings of this study influenced the development of the SDFM residency program.