Profile

New User

New to Graphy Publications? Create an account to get started today.

Registered Users

Have an account? Sign in now.

How to Cite | Author Information | Publication History
International Journal of Psychology & Behavior Analysis Volume 7 (2021), Article ID 7:IJPBA-173, 6 pages
https://doi.org/10.15344/2455-3867/2021/173
Original Article
Influences of Monetary Incentives on Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) Performance

Tokiko Taylor1, Rebecca J. Sargisson2* and Timothy L. Edwards1

1School of Psychology, University of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand
2School of Psychology, University of Waikato, Tauranga, New Zealand
Dr. Rebecca J. Sargisson, School of Psychology, University of Waikato, 101 Durham Street, Tauranga 3110, New Zealand; E-mail: rebecca.sargisson@waikato.ac.nz
18 January 2021; 09 March 2021; 11 March 2021
Taylor T, Sargisson RJ, Edwards TL (2021) Influences of Monetary Incentives on Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) Performance. Int J Psychol Behav Anal 7: 173. doi: https://doi.org/10.15344/2455-3867/2021/173
© 2021 Taylor et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

References

  1. Fazio RH, Jackson JR, Dunton BC, Williams CJ (1995) Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: a bona fide pipeline? J Pers Soc Psychol 69: 1013-1027. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Fazio RH, Olson MA (2003) Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annu Rev Psychol 54: 297-327. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Greenwald AG, Banaji MR (1995) Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychol Rev 102: 4-27. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Nosek BA, Banaji MR (2001) The go/no-go association task. Soc Cognition 19: 625-666. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JLK (1998) Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. J Pers Soc Psychol 74: 1464-1480. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Nosek BA, Hawkins CB, Frazier RS (2011) Implicit social cognition: From measures to mechanisms. Trends Cogn Sci 15: 152-159. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Barnes-Holmes D, Murphy A, Barnes-Holmes Y, Stewart I (2010) The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure: Exploring the impact of private versus public contexts and the response latency criterion on pro-white and anti-black stereotyping among white Irish individuals. Psychol Rec 60: 57-79. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Barnes-Holmes D, Hayden E, Barnes-Holmes Y, Stewart I (2008) The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure as a response-time and event-related-potentials methodology for testing natural verbal relations: a preliminary study. Psychol Rec 58: 497-516. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hughes S, Barnes-Holmes D (2013) A functional approach to the study of implicit cognition: The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) and the Relational Elaboration and Coherence (REC) model. Advances in relational frame theory and contextual behavioral science. New Harbinger, Oakland, CA. [Google Scholar]
  10. Barnes-Holmes D, Barnes-Holmes Y, Power P, Hayden E, Milne R, et al. (2006) Do you really know what you believe? Developing the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) as a direct measure of implicit beliefs. Iri Psychol 32: 169-177 [Google Scholar]
  11. Barnes-Holmes D, Barnes-Holmes Y, Stewart I, Boles S (2010) A sketch of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) and the Relational Elaboration and Coherence (REC) model. Psychol Rec 60: 527-542. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Moore J (2015) From a behavioral point of view: A psychological primer. Cornwall-on-Hudson, NY: Sloan Publishing.
  13. Finn M, Barnes-Holmes D, McEnteggart C (2018) Exploring the single-trial-type-dominance-effect in the IRAP: Developing a differential arbitrarily applicable relational responding effects (DAARRE) model. Psychol Rec 68: 11-25. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Finn M, Barnes-Holmes D, McEnteggart C, Kavanagh D (2019) Predicting and influencing the single-trial-type-dominance-effect: The first study. Psychol Rec 69: 425-435. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kavanagh D, Barnes-Holmes Y, Barnes-Holmes D, McEnteggart C, Finn M, et al. (2018) Exploring differential trial-type effects and the impact of a read aloud procedure on deictic relational responding on the IRAP. Psychol Rec 68: 163-176. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kavanagh D, Matthyssen N, Barnes-Holmes Y, Barnes-Holmes D, McEnteggart C, et al. (2019) Exploring the use of pictures of self and other in the IRAP: Reflecting upon the emergence of differential trial-type effects. Int J Psychol Psychol therapy 19: 323-336. [Google Scholar]
  17. Pidgeon A, McEnteggart C, Harte C, Barnes-Holmes D, Barnes-Holmes Y (2020) Analyzing and interpreting four self-related IRAPs in light of the DAARRE model. Psychol Rec Advanced Online Publication.
  18. Drake CE, Seymour KH, Habib R (2016) Testing the IRAP: Exploring the reliability and fakability of an idiographic approach to interpersonal attitudes. Psychol Rec 66: 153-163. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hughes S, Hussey I, Corrigan B, Jolie K, Murphy C, et al. (2016) Faking revisited: Exerting strategic control over performance on the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure. Eur J Soc Psychol 46: 632-648. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rudy EB, Estok PJ, Kerr ME, Menzel L (1994) Research incentives: money versus gifts. Nurs Res 43: 253-255. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Geier CF, Luna B (2012) Developmental effects of incentives on response inhibition. Child Dev 83: 1262-1274. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Hardin MG, Schroth E, Pine DS, Ernst M (2007) Incentive‐related modulation of cognitive control in healthy, anxious, and depressed adolescents: Development and psychopathology related differences. J Child Psychol Psyc 48: 446-454. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Kleinsorge T, Rinkenauer G (2012) Effects of monetary incentives on task switching. Exp Psychol 59: 216. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Krawczyk DC, D'Esposito M (2013) Modulation of working memory function by motivation through loss-aversion. Hum Brain Mapp 34: 762-774. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Kray J, Schmitt H, Lorenz C, Ferdinand NK (2018) The influence of different kinds of incentives on decision-making and cognitive control in adolescent development: A review of behavioral and neuroscientific studies. Front Psychol 9: 768. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Lydon D M, Roberts NJ, Geier CF (2014) Reduced influence of monetary incentives on Go/NoGo performance during smoking abstinence. Nicotine Tob Res 17: 1178-1181. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. O'Brien KS, Latner JD, Halberstadt J, Hunter JA, Anderson J, et al. (2008) Do antifat attitudes predict antifat behaviors? Obesity 16: S87-S92. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. O'Brien KS, Latner JD, Ebneter D, Hunter JA (2013) Obesity discrimination: The role of physical appearance, personal ideology, and anti-fat prejudice. Int J Obesity 37: 455. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Bessenoff GR, Sherman JW (2000) Automatic and controlled components of prejudice toward fat people: Evaluation versus stereotype activation. Soc Cognition 18: 329-353. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Brochu PM, Morrison MA (2007) Implicit and explicit prejudice toward overweight and average-weight men and women: Testing their correspondence and relation to behavioral intentions. J Soc Psychol 147: 681-706. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  31. Expósito PM, López MH, Valverde MR (2015) Assessment of implicit anti-fat and pro-slim attitudes in young women using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure. Int J Psychol Psychol Ther 15: 17-32. [Google Scholar]
  32. Nolan J, Murphy C, Barnes-Holmes D (2013) Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure and body-weight bias: Influence of gender of participants and targets. Psychol Rec 63: 467-488. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. O'Brien KS, Hunter JA, Banks M (2007) Implicit anti-fat bias in physical educators: Physical attributes, ideology and socialization. Int J Obesity 31: 308-331. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Roddy S, Stewart I, Barnes-Holmes D (2010) Anti-fat, pro-slim, or both? Using two reaction-time based measures to assess implicit attitudes to the slim and overweight. J Health Psychol 15: 416-425. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Teachman BA, Brownell KD (2001) Implicit anti-fat bias among health professionals: is anyone immune? Int J Obesity 25: 1525-1531. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Xu FK, Nosek BA, Greenwald AG, Lofaro N (2014) Weight IAT 2004- 2017 Experiment Materials.
  37. Barnes-Holme, D, Waldron D, Barnes-Holmes Y, Stewart I (2009) Testing the validity of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure and the Implicit Association Test: Measuring attitudes toward Dublin and country life in Ireland. Psychol Rec 59: 389-406. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed). Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
  39. Field A (2018) Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed). Sage, London.
  40. Finn M, Barnes-Holmes D, Hussey I, Graddy J (2016) Exploring the behavioral dynamics of the implicit relational assessment procedure: The impact of three types of introductory rules. Psychol Rec 66: 309-321. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, Safari, Above IE 9.0 version
Privacy Policy | Copyright & Permissions
Copyright © 2013-2024 Graphy Publications, All Rights Reserved.