Profile
International Journal of Gastroenterology Disorders & Therapy Volume 4 (2017), Article ID 4:IJGDT-131, 5 pages
https://doi.org/10.15344/2393-8498/2017/131
Mini Review
Rodent Model of Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Yinshu Wang1, Zijuan Bi1, Enkang Wang1, Boyun Sun1, Yu Zheng1, Linda LD Zhong2* and Jianye Yuan1*

1Institute of Digestive Diseases, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
2School of Chinese Medicine, HongKong Baptist University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China
Dr. Jianye Yuan, Institute of Digestive Diseases, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China; E-mail: yuanjianye@hotmail.com
Dr. Linda LD Zhong, School of Chinese Medicine, HongKong Baptist University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China; E-mail: ldzhong0305@gmail.com
11 September 2017; 02 December 2017; 04 December 2017
Wang Y, Bi Z, Wang E, Sun B, Zheng Y, et al. (2017) Rodent Model of Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Int J Gastroenterol Disord Ther 4: 131. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15344/2393-8498/2017/131
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 81473630.

Abstract

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common gastrointestinal disorder with high prevalence. The main clinical symptoms of IBS include abdominal pain and defecatory irregularities which has profound negative impact on patients’ life quality. Till now, the etiology and pathogenesis of this functional disorder have not been totally elucidated. However, it is widely accepted that the visceral hypersensitivity, the alteration in brain-gut axis and gut microbiota are involved in the process of IBS. And a series of animal models have been applied to imitate these pathological changes. Nowadays, there is no specific drug to cure IBS. Therefore, it is important to understand the pros and cons of the existing IBS animal models, to use these models and to establish better models for drug research and development.


1. Introduction

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional gastrointestinal disorder characterized by abdominal pain, defecatory irregularities and bloating. The prevalence rates of IBS vary between 1.1% and 45% and it is highly disruptive to a patient’s daily life [1]. Currently, the underlying pathogenic mechanisms of IBS remain ambiguous, although increased epithelial permeability, inflammation, visceral hypersensitivity, and altered brain-gut interaction are thought to play essential role in IBS [2]. It has been reported that multiple stimuli play essential role in the initiation and development of IBS. Available animal models mimicking the pathogenesis and the symptoms of IBS are essential for IBS research, which may contribute to the development of new therapy. Most of the IBS animal models are established withvarious stress stimulations. According to the action sites of stimulators, IBS animal models can be divided into three types: central stimulus induced animal model, peripheral stimulus induced animal model and combined central and peripheral stimulus induced complex animal model. Central stimulation induces the alteration of brain activity and further affects the function of gut through braingut axis. Peripheral stimulus induces IBS-like symptom via enteric nervous system.

2. Central stimulation induced animal model

2.1 Psychological stress induced animal model

Psychological pressure is an important cause of IBS. It is possible that chronic or severe stress results in long-lasting changes in the central nervous system (CNS) which provokes the symptoms of IBS [3].Psychological stress induced IBS model can be divided into two types based on the length and frequence of the treatments: acute stress model and chronic stress model. The former was established by giving animal transient stimulation whereas the latter was made by treating the animal with a longer continuous stimulation. Transient stressors can induce an immediate response, and continuous stressors can accumulate and potentiate the effects of stress on the host to produce a persistent reaction [4].

2.1.1 Water avoidance stress (WAS) induced model

2.1.1.1 Chronic water avoidance stress (CWAS) induced model

The most common method to construct this model is to put animal in a plexiglas tank with a block affixed to the center of the floor. The tank is filled with fresh room temperature water. And the block is 1 cm higher than the water level. The animal is placed on the block for continuous 1 h daily with consecutive 10 days. Several researches have reported that 10-day WAS can increase animal’s visceral sensitivity, which is a significant feature of IBS [5-7]. This model was first proposed by Bradesi et al. [8], and it demonstrated a transient somatic antinociceptive response associated with sustained visceral hyperalgesia. In addition, the changes of mucosal immune status of the colon, the increased colonic motor function and increased anxietylike behavior were also observed. Zhuo et al. [5] found the altered pattern of functional brain activation of CWAS rat is similar to that observed in IBS patients by brain imaging studies, providing further validation of the WAS model for IBS. Shi et al. [6] found calcitoningene- related peptide (CGRP) levels in serum and colonic tissue were both increased in CWAS rats. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) level in colonic tissue was also significantly upregulated. However, the levels of 5-hydroxytryptamide (5-HT), serotonin transporter (SERT) and chromogranin A (CgA) in colonic tissue were decreased. Xu et al.[7] found that CWAS can lead to changes of intestinal flora characterized by the reduction of less-abundant families, and can induce lowlevel inflammation and increase intestinal sensitivity. Da Silva et al.[9] modified the method to establish the WAS model by placing the animal on the block for continuous 4 h daily with consecutive 4 days. They found CWAS could induce the visceral hypersensitivity and the alteration of intestinal flora with the decrease of Lactobacillus farciminis population, as observed in IBS patients. Myers gave the rats 1h stress per day for consecutive 7 days and found the chronic stress could also lead to sustained visceral sensitivity, which can be eliminated by glucocorticoid receptor blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists [10]. As a reproducible and non-invasive model, CWAS model could exhibit a series of characteristics of human IBS, such as visceral hypersensitivity and the alteration of intestinal flora although the mechanisms underlying these changes still need to be explored furtherly. The operations of CWAS are easy and stable. But some animals adapt themselves to this environment rapidly, which decreased their responses to the stress.

2.1.1.2 Acute water avoidance stress (AWAS) induced model

AWAS only let animals suffer from stress for 1 h. AWAS model was used earlier than CWAS model in IBS related study. Myers et al. found such acute stress could lead to transient visceral hypersensitivity in rats, and it will disappear after 24 hours [10]. In other two studies, the rats’ visceral hypersensitivity to colon distension has not been observed after 24h from AWAS. Suda et al. [11] found one hour WAS induced acceleration of distal colonic transit and defecation which was mediated by the parasympathetic pelvic efferent. In view of AWAS induced changes of gut mobility and visceral sensitivity cannot be kept for a long time, it is frequently used with other operations, such as maternal separation [12-13], to better mimic IBS. But if we look at the issue from another angle, this model can be used for studying the triggering effect of stressors on the animals that have genetic susceptibility to IBS.

2.1.2 Restraint stress induced animal model

The first restraint stress model was proposed by Williams [14], who constrained upper body of rat for 24 h. This model showed an inhibition of intestinal transport and an increased number of defecation without formation of ulcers. It has been considered as a classic IBS model. Nowadays, improved restraint stress models are widely used. Lv et al. [15] wrapped the shoulder, upper limbs and chest of rats with paper tape after anesthetized with ether to prevent scratching head and face for 1 hour, but other activities of rats were not limited. This model showed increased rectal motility and increased defecation with loose stools as well as visceral hypersensitivity, which indicated that it can be used for motility and visceral sensitivity associated studies. Agostini et al. [16] gave rats a partial restraint stress (PRS) by wrapping the upper forelimbs and the thoracic trunk for 2 h. This PRS significantly increased the number of abdominal contractions and intestinal permeability as well as visceral hypersensitivity. Asano et al. [17] found that the rats subjected to restraint stress displayed an increased number and wet weight of fecal pellets as well as the serum corticosterone level, and that aminophylline can reduce the number of defecation and fecal wet weight, but had no effects on serum cortisol levels. The study conducted by Liu et al. [18] reported that short time restraint stress can lead to a transient increase in sensitivity to nociceptive stress, but had no effect on the contraction of single muscle cells. Restraint stress can induce some changes of gastrointestinal function which is similar to IBS, but it is not suitable for long treatment which may induce somatic damages. In addition, the actual impact on different individuals of restraintis difficult to keep equal.

2.1.3 Neonatal maternal separation (NMS) induced animal model

It has been widely accepted that early life negative events, such as loss of family member, could have detrimental impacts on individuals. This personal injury can last for a long time up to adulthood and may be a significant predictor of psychiatric disorders in adulthood. It has been reported that early life stressors like maternal deprivation can increase the risk to develop IBS in adulthood [19]. Based on this, the NMS model is constructed to mimick the early deprivation of maternal care in human beings. The commonly used method is to separate neonatal rats from their mothers for 3 h daily between postnatal days 2-14. NMS could induce visceral hypersensitivity and changes of HPA-axis [20-23]. Barouei et al. [21] have found that suffering from NMS significantly increased Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH) levels in plasma and fecal counts of aerobes, anaerobes, enterococci, clostridia and Escherichia (E. coli), but reduced plasma IgA levels compared with non-NMS animals. Miquelet al. [22] separated wild-type C57Bl/AJ pups from their mother three hours per day, from postnatal day 2 to14 and resulted in a negative impact on fecal Faecalibacterium prausnitzii population. The report of Zhou indicated that the abundance of Fusobacterium, which is able to reduce the degree of visceral hypersensitivity was significantly decreased in the C57Bl/AJ mice that underwent NMS [23]. The research of McKernan et al. [24] showed that the mRNA expression of TLR3, TLR4 and TLR5 in distal and proximal colonic mucosa of NMS model was significant increased, suggesting that NMS modulated innate immune responses. Tjong and his colleagues showed NMS increased the Nitric oxide (NO) synthesis by NO synthase (nNOS)upregulation that interact with reactive oxygen species contributing to the visceral hypersensitivity [25]. All the evidence above suggested that the alteration of gut sensitivity, microbiota and immune function in NMS model is similar to that in IBS patient. However, the mothers’ feed deprivation is liable to cause malnutrition [20].

2.2 Intracerebral injection of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) induced animal model

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), also known as corticotropinreleasing hormone or corticoliberin, is an important peptide hormone involved in stress response in the brain-gut axis. CRF is released in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) and stimulates ACTH secretion from the pituitary gland. CRF is considered as an important mediator of visceral hypersensitivity. The effect of CRF is mediated by CRF receptors expressed on the cell membrane of effect organ [26]. Many reports proved that intracerebral injection of CRF (CRF microinjected intocerebral ventricle or the central nucleus of the amygdala with the dose of 0.1to 10μg•kg-1)increased colonic motility, visceral perception, and induced anxiety-like behavior [27,28] which can be blocked by administration of CRF receptor type 1 antagonist CP-15426 [28] or JTC017 [29]. It seems that intracerebral injection of CRF is an easy way to induce visceral hyperalgesia and colonic motility alteration which are important in pathophysiology of IBS. But the operators need to be skilled enough to perform it. More importantly, it is an invasive method and there exists the risk of organic cerebral injury. The injection dosage should be strictly controlled. Furthermore, the single-chemical injection approach is not likely to fully mimic the complex changes of neuroendocrine immune system in IBS patients.

These models are based on the sensitization of colonic primary afferent fibers which can be induced by inflammation, mechanical or chemical stimulation. The nociceptive signal is then transferred to the central system and cause visceral hypersensitivity. Locally, several mediators including 5-hydroxytryptamine, tachykinin, bradykinin, calcitonin gene-related peptide, and neurotrophin are of great importance for sensitizing nerve endings.

3. Peripheral stimulation Induced Animal Model

These models are based on the sensitization of colonic primary afferent fibers which can be induced by inflammation, mechanical or chemical stimulation. The nociceptive signal is then transferred to the central system and cause visceral hypersensitivity. Locally, several mediators including 5-hydroxytryptamine, tachykinin, bradykinin, calcitonin gene-related peptide, and neurotrophin are of great importance for sensitizing nerve endings.

3.1 Chemical stimulation induced animal model

Chemical substance enema is the common method to establish these models. And the most widely used chemical mediators include acetic acid, butyric acid salt, mustard oil (MO), glycerin, yeast polysaccharide, turpentine, formaldehyde, and so on. It was reported that adult rats that underwent MO enema treatment neonatally exhibited chronic visceral hypersensitivity [30]. Kimball et al. [31] showed that 50μl of MO (1% in 70% ethanol) clyster under isoflurane anesthesia could induce hyper motility and cause diarrhea in rats and was used as a model of IBS-D. Liu et al. [32] inserted a plastic catheter into the rats’ descending colon 8 cm from anus; then acetic acid (4%, 1 ml/rat) aqueous solution was instilled slowly for 30 s. The treatment led to the sparsity of microvilli on the surface of the intestine and the decreased expression of tight junction protein zonula occludens-1 and occludin. Liuet al. [33] gave rats’ intracolonic injection with 0.1 ml zymosan suspension to induce obvious visceral pain. Low dose but not high dose of dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) didn’t induce obvious damage on the histological structure of intestinal tissue [34,35]. Scanzi et al. [34] added 0.5% DSS to drinking water and fed mice for 12 days. The mice developed visceral hypersensitivity companied with the increased expression of Cav3.2 mRNA in the colon without colonic inflammation, which were also observed in IBS patients. This model revealed the involvement of iron channel Cav3.2 in hypersensitivity of IBS. Traubet al. [35] used deoxycholic acid (DCA) to induce the post infective IBS (PI-IBS): DCA was instilled into the rat colon one time daily for 3 days. DCA could induce a mild, transient colonic inflammation which would gradually vanish in 3 weeks. But the exaggerated visceromotor response, increased spinal c-fos expression, and the over activity of colonic afferent and dorsal horn neuron which appeared in the first week persisted for at least 4 weeks. The chemical stimulation induced model could mimic some functional defects of gut in IBS but not the full spectrum of the natural cause of IBS in human. And that the dosage of the chemical agents must be low enough to avoid the obvious damage on the histological structure of intestine unless the damage can heal itself soon to mimic PI-IBS.

3.2 Mechanical stimulation induced animal model

Colorectal distension (CRD) as a mechanical stimulation is a popular method to establish visceral pain model to study IBS. Abdominal withdrawal reflex (AWR) scores were used to assess the degree of visceral pain. In a research performed by Yang et al. [36], the researchers inserted a flexible latex balloon covered with lubricant into the descending colon and rectum of rat under ether anesthesia. Then the balloon was inflated with air at a speed of 0.133 kPa/s (0.998 mmHg/s) after rat was fully recovered from anesthesia and the upper limit of balloon pressure was set at 13.33 kPa (99.8 mmHg) to avoid the rectum damage. Lee’s [37] study demonstrated that the expression of pain-related substances such as substance P (SP), c-fos, and phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (p-ERK) in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) and spinal cord were increased in response to CRD. And DA-9701, a prokinetic agent significantly decreased the CRD-induced visceral pain probably by down regulating pain-related factors. Saito et al. [29] found that CRD induced the increases of hippocampal noradrenaline release, ACTH release, colonic motility, somatic motor responses and anxiety in rats. CRD provides a reliable model for studying the mechanism of visceral pain and for developing drugs on visceral pain. But it easily causes mechanical injury of intestine with misoperation and it is at variance with the natural cause of IBS in human.

3.3 Bacterial infection induced animal model

It was reported that a chronic and persistent IBS symptoms could be developed after the remission of acute intestinal infection with harmful bacteria and it was defined as post infectious irritable bowel symdrome (PI-IBS). Infectious gastroenteritis is regarded as the major risk factor to develop PI-IBS. It has been reported that the alteration of gut microbiota with the decrease in beneficial bacteria such as bifidobacteria and the increase in harmful bacteria such as E. coli, Campylobacter jejuni (C. jejuni) may directly trigger proinflammatory signaling in intestinal epithelia [38]. PI-IBS models are always established through harmful bacteria infection and the commonly used species include Citrobacter rodentium (C. Rodentium) and C. jejuni, etc. In the study of Jee et al.[39], the rats were gavaged with C. jejuni 81-176.After the clearance of C. jejuni, small bowel bacterial overgrowth appeared and it seemed to be associated with the reduction of interstitial cells of Cajal which modified gut motility. In a recent study carried out by Mondelaers et al. [40], C. Rodentium infection induced transient visceral hypersensitivity in C57BL/6 and Balb/c mice, which persisted for about 2 weeks and 3 weeks, respectively. Bacterial infection can destroy the balance of intestinal flora and can effectively induce the pathological changes of intestine with some IBS-like symptoms. But the results to develop PI-IBS vary with different infectious agents.

3.4 Parasite infection induced animal model

Like bacterial infection, parasite infection can disturb the balance of intestinal microecology. Cryptosporidium parvum (C. parvum) are obligate intracellular protozoans which can cause gastrointestinal tract infection in animals and humans [41,42]. Symptoms following C. parvum infection including diarrhea and abdominal pain are similar to those of IBS. In the study of Khaldiet al. [43], the fiveday old rats were orally fed with 105 oocysts of Nouzilly (NoI) or Iowa (IoI) C. parvum isolate which induced villus atrophy, crypt hyperplasia, and inflammatory cell infiltration in jejunum or ileum and jejunal hypersensitivity to distension. The severity of infection and the onset of jejunal hypersensition are different which indicated that they are isolate dependent. Besides, Bai et al. [44] also confirmed this model’s reliability and found that the agonist of somatostatin could prevent the development of jejunal hypersensitivity in cryptosporidiosis. Trichinella spiralis (T. spiralis) is also a commonly used parasite to establish the PI-IBS model. The decreased bile acid absorption contributing to IBS-associated diarrhea has been verified in T. spiralis infection model [45]. And the increased energy metablism, fat mobilization and disrupted amino acid metabolism have also been reported in this model [46]. A recent research showed that the mice with acute T. spiralis infection or post infection had the similar sensitivities with significantly decreased pain threshold compared to non-infection mice, and found a candidate biomarker for visceral hypersensitivity - Piezo2 [47]. In Yang’s research [48], the mice exhibited a long-term colonic hypersensitivity after T. spiralis infection and the levels of IFN-γ and IL-17 were increased in the duodenum and ileum. Parasite infection induced a relevant animal model for studying PI-IBS with a long-lasting hypersensitivity but its impact on gut motility needs further study.

3.5 Parasite infection induced animal model

Cao et al. [49] established a visceral hypersensitivity animal model by injecting intraperitoneally 10 μg egg albumin (antigen) and 10 mg aluminum hydroxide (adjuvant) in 1 ml saline to induce colonic anaphylaxis. They found that the visceral hypersensitivity rats exhibited an impaired decision-making behavior which is associated with the disruption of phase-locking in the anterior cingulate cortex. In the experiment of Mackey et al. [50] IgE-mediated passive systemic anaphylaxis was imposed on C57BL/6 male and female mice. Briefly, 12-week old mice were injected intraperitoneally with 10ug mouse monoclonal anti-DNP IgE and were challenged with 500 μg 2, 4-dinitrophenyl-human serum albumin 24 h after IgE injection. In this model, the mast cell responses to immunological stress are different between female and male mice implicating female predominance for IBS. Not only visceral hypersensitivity, but also increased mast cell (MC) degranulation, high intestinal barrier permeability and anxiety behavior can be observed in immunological stress induced animal model.

4. Combined Animal Model

To eliminate the possibility of rats habituating to single repetitive stimulus and to mimic the multiple pathogenetic factors of IBS, several combined animal models have been developed by exposing animals to variable stimuli. Zhuang et al. [51] combined acetic acid with restraint stress to establish an IBS model. They found this model presented gut visceral hypersensitivity, increased levels of IL-4 and IL-9 in serum and intestinal mucosa, promoted mast cell degranulation. In another study, Gong et al. [52] confirmed that there was no remarkable inflammation in the colon of this combined model. The combination of colorectal distension and restraint stress can induce immunologic alteration in rats. The increased dendritic cells (DCs) in colon stimulate CD4+ T cells to secrete abundant IL- 4, which led to MC degranulation and subsequently resulted in visceral hypersensitivity [53]. Some other models were established by combining parasitization with stress. Spreadbury et al. [54] found that chronic WAS stress combined with C. Rodentium infection significantly enhanced the excitability of DRG. Because of the complex etiology and multiple mechanisms of IBS which are still unclear, it is urgent and more realistic to developmore new IBS animal models using combined technical means and use these novel IBS models for pathophysiologic research and drug development.

5. Discussion

As a multifactorial disease, the pathogenesis of IBS is complex and has not been fully understood yet. Intervention studies are not feasible with human subjects. Animal models provide good approaches to investigate the pathogenesis of IBS without the potential risks of human study. Because of the variation of clinical manifestation of different IBS subtypes in different stages, many animal models can only mimic limited aspects of the pathophysiology of IBS. And at present, the explicit biomarkers for diagnosing IBS are still missing. It is necessary to establish accurate and effective standards to evaluate the objectivity and validity of IBS animal models although IBS-like alterations of motility and sensitivity are achieved in most models. Abdominal withdraw reflex score is widely used to evaluate the sensibility to CRD, but it is not a fully objective indicator.

There are advantages and disadvantages in existing IBS animal models which need to be improved continuously. With the development of neuroimaging technology, it will become more and more popular in IBS diagnosis and in the evaluation of IBS rodent models. This application provides many opportunities for bidirectional translation between IBS patients and IBS animal models [55] and will be helpful to provide a more objective and standardized evaluation for animal models. Furthermore, changes in the intestinal microbiota should be considered when establishing animal models of different subtypes [56]. We believe that the composited application of molecular biology, physiology, pathology, immunology, microbiology and other disciplines will facilitate the development of novel IBS models that are more representative and closer to the pathophysiology of human IBS.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


References

  1. Piche T, Ducrotte P, Sabate JM, Coffin B, Zerbib F, et al. (2010) Impact of functional bowel symptoms on quality of life and fatigue in quiescent Crohn disease and irritable bowel syndrome. Neurogastroenterol Motil 22: 626-e174. View
  2. Enck P, Aziz Q, Barbara G, Farmer AD, Fukudo S, Mayer EA, ex al. (2016) Irritable bowel syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2: 16015. View
  3. Mertz H (2002) Role of the brain and sensory pathways in gastrointestinal sensory disorders in humans. Gut 51: i29-i33. View
  4. Moloney RD, O'Mahony SM, Dinan TG, Cryan JF (2015) Stress-induced visceral pain: toward animal models of irritable-bowel syndrome and associated comorbidities. Front Psychiatry 6: 15. View
  5. Wang Z, Ocampo MA, Pang RD, Bota M, Bradesi S, et al. (2013) Alterations in prefrontal-limbic functional activation and connectivity in chronic stressinduced visceral hyperalgesia. PLoS One 8: e59138. View
  6. Shi HL, Liu CH, Ding LL, Zheng Y, Fei XY, et al. (2015) Alterations in serotonin, transient receptor potential channels and protease-activated receptors in rats with irritable bowel syndrome attenuated by Shugan decoction. World J Gastroenterol 21: 4852-4863. View
  7. Xu D, Gao J, Gillilland M, Wu X, Song I, et al. (2014) Rifaximin alters intestinal bacteria and prevents stress-induced gut inflammation and visceral hyperalgesia in rats. Gastroenterology 146: 484-96. e4. View
  8. Bradesi S, Schwetz I, Ennes HS, Lamy CM, Ohning G, et al. (2005) Repeated exposure to water avoidance stress in rats: a new model for sustained visceral hyperalgesia. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 289: G42-53. View
  9. Da Silva S, Robbe-Masselot C, Raymond A, Mercade-Loubiere M, Salvador-Cartier C, et al. (2015) Spatial Localization and Binding of the Probiotic Lactobacillus farciminis to the Rat Intestinal Mucosa: Influence of Chronic Stress. PLoS One 10: e0136048. View
  10. Myers B, Greenwood-Van Meerveld B(2012) Differential involvement of amygdala corticosteroid receptors in visceral hyperalgesia following acute or repeated stress. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 302: G260-G266. View
  11. Suda K, Setoyama H, Nanno M, Matsumoto S,Kawai M (2013) Involvement of parasympathetic pelvic efferent pathway in psychological stress-induced defecation. World J Gastroenterol 19: 1200-1209. View
  12. Stanisor OI, van Diest SA, Yu Z, Welting O, Bekkali N, et al. (2013) Stressinduced visceral hypersensitivity in maternally separated rats can be reversed by peripherally restricted histamine-1-receptor antagonists. PLoS One 8: e66884. View
  13. van den Wijngaard RM, Stanisor OI, van Diest SA, Welting O, Wouters MM, et al. (2013) Susceptibility to stress induced visceral hypersensitivity in maternally separated rats is transferred across generations. Neurogastroenterol Motil 25: e780-e790. View
  14. Williams CL, Villar RG, Peterson JM,Burks TF (1988) Stress-induced changes in intestinal transit in the rat: a model for irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 94: 611-621. View
  15. Lv H, Wang WA, Qian JM (1992) The evaluation of visceral sensation in traditional restraint wrap stress animal model. Chin J Gastro Hepa 14:111- 113.
  16. Agostini S, Goubern M, Tondereau V, Salvador-Cartier C, Bezirard V, et al. (2012) A marketed fermented dairy product containing Bifidobacterium lactis CNCM I-2494 suppresses gut hypersensitivity and colonic barrier disruption induced by acute stress in rats. Neurogastroenterol Motil 24: 376-e172. View
  17. Asano T, Tanaka KI, Tada A, Shimamura H, Tanaka R, et al. (2017) Aminophylline suppresses stress-induced visceral hypersensitivity and defecation in irritable bowel syndrome. Sci Rep 7: 40214. View
  18. Sun Y, Liu FL, Song GQ, Qian W, Hou XH (2006) Effects of acute and chronic restraint stress on visceral sensitivity and neuroendocrine hormones in rats. Gastroenterology 11: 99-102. View
  19. Larauche M, Mulak A,Tache Y (2011) Stress-related alterations of visceral sensation: animal models for irritable bowel syndrome study. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 17: 213-234. View
  20. Greenwood-Van Meerveld B, Prusator DK, Johnson AC (2015) Animal models of gastrointestinal and liver diseases. Animal models of visceral pain: pathophysiology, translational relevance, and challenges. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 308: G885-G903. View
  21. Barouei J, Moussavi M,Hodgson DM (2012) Effect of maternal probiotic intervention on HPA axis, immunity and gut microbiota in a rat model of irritable bowel syndrome. PLoS One 7: e46051. View
  22. Miquel S, Martin R, Lashermes A, Gillet M, Meleine M, et al. (2016) Antinociceptive effect of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in non-inflammatory IBSlike models. Sci Rep 6: 19399. View
  23. Zhou XY, Li M, Li X, Long X, Zuo XL, et al. (2016) Visceral hypersensitive rats share common dysbiosis features with irritable bowel syndrome patients. World J Gastroenterol 22: 5211-5227. View
  24. McKernan DP, Nolan A, Brint EK, O'Mahony SM, Hyland NP, et al. (2009) Toll-like receptor mRNA expression is selectively increased in the colonic mucosa of two animal models relevant to irritable bowel syndrome. PLoS One 4: e8226. View
  25. Tjong YW, Ip SP, Lao L, Wu J, Fong HH, et al. (2011) Role of neuronal nitric oxide synthase in colonic distension-induced hyperalgesia in distal colon of neonatal maternal separated male rats. Neurogastroenterol Motil 23: 666-e278. View
  26. Chang CP, Pearse RV, O'Connell S, Rosenfeld MG (1993) Identification of a seven transmembrane helix receptor for corticotropin-releasing factor and sauvagine in mammalian brain. Neuron 11: 1187-1195. View
  27. Gue M, Del Rio-Lacheze C, Eutamene H, Theodorou V, Fioramonti J, et al. (1997) Stress-induced visceral hypersensitivity to rectal distension in rats: role of CRF and mast cells. Neurogastroenterol Motil 9: 271-279. View
  28. Su J, Tanaka Y, Muratsubaki T, Kano M, Kanazawa M, et al. (2015) Injection of corticotropin-releasing hormone into the amygdala aggravates visceral nociception and induces noradrenaline release in rats. Neurogastroenterol Motil 27: 30-39. View
  29. Saito K, Kasai T, Nagura Y, Ito H, Kanazawa M, et al. (2005) Corticotropinreleasing hormone receptor 1 antagonist blocks brain-gut activation induced by colonic distention in rats. Gastroenterology 129: 1533-1543. View
  30. Price DD, Craggs JG, Zhou Q, Verne GN, Perlstein WM, et al. (2009) Wide spread hyperalgesia in irritable bowel syndrome is dynamically maintained by tonic visceral impulse input and placebo/nocebo factors: evidence from human psychophysics, animal models, and neuroimaging. Neuroimage 47: 995-1001. View
  31. Kimball ES, Palmer JM, D'Andrea MR, Hornby PJ, Wade PR (2005) Acute colitis induction by oil of mustard results in later development of an IBSlike accelerated upper GI transit in mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 288: G1266-G1273. View
  32. Liu Y, Liu W, Peng QX, Peng JL, Yu LZ, et al. (2014) Protective effect of huoxiang zhengqi oral liquid on intestinal mucosal mechanical barrier of rats with postinfectious irritable bowel syndrome induced by acetic Acid. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2014: 218383. View
  33. Liu SB, Zhang MM, Cheng LF, Shi J, Lu JS, et al. (2015) Long-term upregulation of cortical glutamatergic AMPA receptors in a mouse model of chronic visceral pain. Mol Brain 8: 76. View
  34. Scanzi J, Accarie A, Muller E, Pereira B, Aissouni Y, et al. (2016) Colonic overexpression of the T-type calcium channel Cav 3.2 in a mouse model of visceral hypersensitivity and in irritable bowel syndrome patients. Neurogastroenterol Motil 28: 1632-1640. View
  35. Traub RJ, Tang B, Ji Y, Pandya S, Yfantis H, et al. (2008) A rat model of chronic postinflammatory visceral pain induced by deoxycholic acid. Gastroenterology 135: 2075-83. View
  36. Yang JP, Yao M, Jiang XH,Wang LN (2006) Establishment of model of visceral pain due to colorectal distension and its behavioral assessment in rats. World J Gastroenterol 12: 2781-2784. View
  37. Lee SP, Lee KN, Lee OY, Lee HL, Jun DW, et al. (2014) Effects of DA-9701, a novel prokinetic agent, on phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase expression in the dorsal root ganglion and spinal cord induced by colorectal distension in rats. Gut Liver 8: 140-147. View
  38. Reti KL, Tymensen LD, Davis SP, Amrein MW, Buret AG (2015) Campylobacter jejuni increases flagellar expression and adhesion of noninvasive Escherichia coli: effects on enterocytic Toll-like receptor 4 and CXCL-8 expression. Infect Immun 83: 4571-4581. View
  39. Jee SR, Morales W, Low K, Chang C, Zhu A, et al. (2010) ICC density predicts bacterial overgrowth in a rat model of post-infectious IBS. World J Gastroenterol 16: 3680-3686. View
  40. Mondelaers SU, Theofanous SA, Florens MV, Perna E, Aguilera- Lizarraga J, et al. (2016) Effect of genetic background and postinfectious stress on visceral sensitivity in Citrobacter rodentium-infected mice. Neurogastroenterol Motil 28: 647-658. View
  41. Morgan UM, Xiao L, Fayer R, Lal AA,Thompson RC (2000) Epidemiology and strain variation of Cryptosporidium parvum. Contrib Microbiol 6: 116- 139. View
  42. Thielman NM,Guerrant RL (2004) Clinical practice. Acute infectious diarrhea. N Engl J Med 350: 38-47. View
  43. Khaldi S, Gargala G, Le Goff L, Parey S, Francois A, et al. (2009) Cryptosporidium parvum isolate-dependent postinfectious jejunal hypersensitivity and mast cell accumulation in an immunocompetent rat model. Infect Immun 77: 5163-5169. View
  44. Bai J, Khaldi S, Gargala G, Baishanbo A, Francois A, et al. (2011) Effects of octreotide on jejunal hypersensitivity triggered by Cryptosporidium parvum intestinal infection in an immunocompetent suckling rat model. Neurogastroenterol Motil 23: 1043-50, e499. View
  45. Kalia N, Hardcastle J, Keating C, Grasa L, Keating C, et al. (2008) Intestinal secretory and absorptive function in Trichinella spiralis mouse model of postinfective gut dysfunction: role of bile acids. Gut 57: 41-49. View
  46. Martin FP, Verdu EF, Wang Y, Dumas ME, Yap IK, et al. (2006) Transgenomic metabolicinteractions in a mouse disease model: interactions of Trichinella spiralis infection with dietary Lactobacillus paracasei supplementation. J Proteome Res 5: 2185-2193. View
  47. Bai T, Li Y, Xia J, Jiang Y, Zhang L, et al. (2017) Piezo2: A Candidate Biomarker for Visceral Hypersensitivity in Irritable Bowel Syndrome? J Neurogastroenterol Motil 23: 453-463. View
  48. Yang B, Zhou X,Lan C (2015) Changes of cytokine levels in a mouse model of post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome. BMC Gastroenterol 15: 43. View
  49. Cao B, Wang J, Mu L, Poon DC, Li Y (2016) Impairment of decision making associated with disruption of phase-locking in the anterior cingulate cortex in viscerally hypersensitive rats. Exp Neurol 286: 21-31. View
  50. Mackey E, Ayyadurai S, Pohl CS, S DC, Li Y, et al. (2016) Sexual dimorphism in the mast cell transcriptome and the pathophysiological responses to immunological and psychological stress. Biol Sex Differ 7: 60. View
  51. Zhuang Z, Zhang L, Wang X, Tao L,Lv B (2016) PDIA3 gene induces visceral hypersensitivity in rats with irritable bowel syndrome through the dendritic cell-mediated activation of T cells. Peer J 4: e2644. View
  52. Gong Z, Chen Y, Zhang R, Wang Y, Yang Q, et al. (2014) Pharmacokinetics of two alkaloids after oral administration of rhizoma coptidis extract in normal rats and irritable bowel syndrome rats. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2014: 845048. View
  53. Li M, Zhang L, Lu B, Chen Z, Chu L, et al. (2015) Role of dendritic cellmediated abnormal immune response in visceral hypersensitivity. Int J Clin Exp Med 8: 13243-13250. View
  54. Spreadbury I, Ochoa-Cortes F, Ibeakanma C, Martin N, Hurlbut D, et al. (2015) Concurrent psychological stress and infectious colitis is key to sustaining enhanced peripheral sensory signaling. Neurogastroenterol Motil 27: 347-355. View
  55. Holschneider DP, Bradesi S, Mayer EA (2011) The role of experimental models in developing new treatments for irritable bowel syndrome. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 5: 43-57. View
  56. Fuentes IM, Christianson JA (2016) Ion channels, ion channel receptors, and visceral hypersensitivity in irritable bowel syndrome. Neurogastroenterol Motil 28: 1613-1618. View