Profile
International Journal of Gastroenterology Disorders & Therapy Volume 2 (2015), Article ID 2:IJGDT-116, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.15344/2393-8498/2015/116
Expert Opinion
Pillcam Colon 2 in Crohn's Disease: Pan-enteric Tool for a Pan-enteric Disease

Bruno Rosa1, Pedro Boal Carvalho1 and José Cotter1,2,3*

1Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar do Alto Ave – Guimarães, Portugal
2Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Health Sciences, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
3ICVS/3B’s, PT Government Associate Laboratory, 4710-057 Braga/Guimarães, Portugal
José Cotter, Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar do Alto Ave – Guimarães, Portugal; E-mail: jcotter@chaa.min-saude.pt
12 January 2015; 19 September 2015; 22 September 2015
Rosa B, Carvalho PB, Cotter J (2015) Pillcam Colon 2 in Crohn's Disease: Pan-enteric Tool for a Pan-enteric Disease. Int J Gastroenterol Disord Ther 2: 116. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15344/2393-8498/2015/116

1. Introduction

Crohn's Disease (CD) is a chronic idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease that may affect any segment of the digestive tract, from mouth to anus. The disease affects the small bowel in approximately 80% of cases, and nearly one half of patients have involvement of both the small bowel and the colon [1]. While ileocolonoscopy remains the mainstay for the diagnosis of CD, the location and extent of the disease in the upper gastrointestinal tract and the small bowel upstream of the terminal ileum should also be assessed, as it may have both prognostic and therapeutic implications [2]. Indeed, although the terminal ileum is the most commonly affected segment, up to half of the patients suffering from ileal CD may have concomitant jejunal lesions which negatively affect the prognosis [3,4] Moreover, in some patients, CD affects only the small bowel proximal to the terminal ileum, which poses a particular diagnostic challenge [1,5]. Gross involvement of the esophagus, stomach, or duodenum is relatively rare and almost always seen in association with disease of the distal small bowel or colon [2].

2. Capsule Endoscopy in Patients with Crohn’s Disease

The evaluation of patients with suspected or known CD is among the clearly established clinical indications for capsule endoscopy [1,6]. Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) has been shown to have the highest diagnostic yield among all imaging modalities of the small bowel for the detection of CD inflammatory lesions, particularly in the case of superficial lesions and those located in the proximal small bowel [1,7,8]. In patients with suspected CD, it is possible to confidently exclude the diagnosis if no small bowel mucosal changes are identified by the capsule, because it is highly sensitive even for subtle mucosal changes [9,10], thus having a high negative predictive value. SBCE may also be a key diagnostic instrument if it reveals small bowel lesions consistent with CD in adequately selected patients [10- 13]. In patients with established CD, capsule endoscopy is useful to evaluate disease extent and activity [3,4], as it may influence therapeutic decisions by detecting previously unknown small bowel lesions [14-16]. SBCE has been used to investigate CD patients with atypical symptoms, unexplained anemia or obscure GI bleeding1, as well as in the post-operative setting [17,18]. Furthermore, it has also been used to assess small bowel mucosal healing after therapy, which is an important endpoint of treatment efficacy, associated with sustained clinical remission and improved outcomes [1,19-21].

3. PillCam® COLON 2

While ileocolonoscopy is currently the gold standard for endoscopic evaluation of patients with CD, it is restricted to the colon and terminal ileum, and it is an invasive procedure associated with discomfort or pain, often requiring sedation. Moreover, patients with severely active disease undergoing colonoscopy are at increased risk of complications such as perforation [22], and would benefit from a less invasive diagnostic procedure. Recently, a capsule aimed at colonic observation has been developed [23], which has been primarily used for colorectal cancer screening in average risk populations or when colonoscopy is contraindicated or incomplete [24-26]. Although it still requires colon preparation, colon capsule endoscopy does not require insufflation or sedation, and the risks associated with the procedure are minimal [25,27]. Currently on its second-generation, this colon capsule (PillCam® COLON 2, PCC-2) measures 11.6 mm × 31.5 mm and it has one camera at each end, with an angle of view of 172°, allowing for nearly 360° coverage of the colon. PCC- 2 captures 4 images per second during the first 3 minutes following activation, and then works at a low rate of 14 images per minute until small bowel images are detected [22]. The capsule then turns into an adaptive frame rate mode, capturing from 4 frames per second when stationary, up to 35 frames per second when in motion [22]. With this technology, the risk of missing lesions while the capsule is moving is reduced, which may be particularly relevant during its rapid passage through the transverse colon, at the same time saving battery energy and optimizing the video length. It is also possible to get the adaptive frame rate mode activated from the beginning of the examination, even before capsule ingestion, in order to improve imaging of the upper GI tract. The data recorder (DR3) assists the medical staff and the patient through the procedure according to a pre-selected preparation protocol, by alerting and displaying on the screen a sequence of instructions, paving the way for PCC-2 to be offered as an out-of-clinic procedure [28]. Figure 1 summarizes the current protocol in our unit. With the DR3 we can use real-time viewing to selectively administer a prokinetic drug to patients with delayed gastric emptying [29]. If the capsule is still remaining in the gastric cavity one hour after ingestion, DR3 will instruct the patient to get a prokinetic such as oral domperidone. DR3 is also able to automatically detect when the capsule starts capturing images of the small bowel, with an estimated sensitivity of 98.3% sensitivity [28], subsequently activating the adaptive frame rate which will capture up to 35 frames per second, and it also alerts the patient to ingest the first booster laxative (sodium phosphate, NaP), which will accelerate small bowel transit time of the capsule and help to maintain the colon cleanliness. DR3 will also notify the patient to have a second booster of NaP, and finally a bisacodyl suppository if the capsule has not been excreted three hours after administering the second NaP booster, in order to accelerate colonic peristalsis and get images from the left colon and rectum before the capsule battery exhaustion. Colon capsule endoscopy appears to be a feasible and very safe procedure, with a very low rate of technical failures (~3%) and a high capsule excretion rate of about 90% [30]. In the setting of colorectal cancer screening, it has demonstrated a high sensitivity for the detection of polyps, with a clinically very meaningful negative predictive value of 97% [26,31,32]. Some recent studies have focused on the potential role of colon capsule endoscopy in patients with ulcerative colitis [33,34] and colonic CD [35], generally showing that it may be useful to monitor inflammation and to screen for colorectal cancer, having a good correlation with standard flexible colonoscopy, although some data showed that the severity and extension of the inflammation could be underestimated by the capsule [36]. Thus, international recommendations currently indicate that there are still insufficient data to support the use of colon capsule endoscopy in the diagnostic work-up or in the surveillance of patients with suspected or known IBD [1,30].

figure 1
Figure 1: Summarizes the current protocol in our unit.

4. Pan-endoscopy in Crohn’s Disease

The availability of PCC-2 triggered a new concept, based on the possibility to perform a complete examination of the whole GI tract from mouth to anus (pan-endoscopy) with a single non-invasive procedure [37]. Although the exploration of the esophagus and stomach rests sub-optimal with the currently available capsule models, the feasibility of remotely controlled prototypes has been demonstrated, making it expectable to have such limitations overcome in a near future [38-43]. Although there are currently no specific recommendations to routinely perform upper GI endoscopy in adult CD patients, it may contribute to establish the diagnosis, to assess disease extension and severity and to aid in tailoring therapy in selected patients1. PCC-2 is expected to offer at least the same accuracy as SBCE for the evaluation of the small bowel, while enabling the additional atractive feature of also exploring the colon within the same non-invasive examination. Having this concept in mind, our centre is currently using PCC-2 to evaluate post-therapy mucosal healing in patients with small bowel plus colonic CD on corticosteroid-free clinical remission, which had been submitted to both ileocolonoscopy and SBCE at diagnosis and with at least one year of follow-up. Interim analysis after inclusion of 12 patients, mostly (~80%) treated with azathioprine and/or biological therapy, revealed that only 3 patients (25%) achieved mucosal healing in both the small bowel and the colon, despite being in corticosteroidfree clinical remission (unpublished data). This highlights the limitations of clinical disease assessment when stratifying disease activity and when identifying patients in need for therapeutic adjustment. Moreover, 5 patients (42%) had mucosal healing in only one segment (small bowel or colon), which emphasizes the importance of full endoscopic evaluation of both the small bowel and colon to assess mucosal healing in CD. PCC-2 allowed for a non-invasive, safe and well tolerated examination of the entire gastrointestinal tract, achieving nearly 85% complete examinations, with good or excellent bowel preparation in approximately two thirds of patients.

In order to increase objectivity and inter observer agreement in the evaluation of small bowel inflammatory activity, the use of standardized endoscopic scoring systems such as the Lewis Score (LS)44 and the Capsule Endoscopy Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (CECDAI or Niv Score)45 has been recommended1. In a near future, the development of a new score that will apply to PCC-2 panendoscopy in CD, integrating both small bowel and colonic pathology, may be expected as this is steadily emerging as a new exciting concept for the investigation of this pan-enteric disease, based on a compromise of high diagnostic accuracy with less invasiveness and convenience for patients.

Competing Interests

The authors have no competing interests with the work presented in this manuscript.


References

  1. Annese V, Daperno M, Rutter MD, Amiot A, Bossuyt P, et al. (2013) European evidence based consensus for endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohns Colitis 7: 982-1018. View
  2. Van Assche G, Dignass A, Panes J, Beaugerie L, Karagiannis J, et al. (2010) The second European evidence-based Consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn's disease: Definitions and diagnosis. J Crohns Colitis 4: 7-27. View
  3. Flamant M, Trang C, Maillard O, Sacher-Huvelin S, Le Rhun M, et al. (2013) The prevalence and outcome of jejunal lesions visualized by small bowel capsule endoscopy in Crohn's disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 19: 1390-1396. View
  4. Park SK, Yang SK, Park SH, Park SH, Kim JW, et al. (2013) Longterm prognosis of the jejunal involvement of Crohn's disease. J Clin Gastroenterol 47: 400-408. View
  5. Doherty GA, Moss AC, Cheifetz AS (2011) Capsule endoscopy for smallbowel evaluation in Crohn's disease. Gastrointest Endosc 74: 167-175. View
  6. Koulaouzidis A, Rondonotti E, Karargyris A (2013) Small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a ten-point contemporary review. World J Gastroenterol 19: 3726-3746. View
  7. Dionisio PM, Gurudu SR, Leighton JA, Leontiadis GI, Fleischer DE, et al. (2010) Capsule endoscopy has a significantly higher diagnostic yield in patients with suspected and established small-bowel Crohn's disease: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 105: 1240-1248. View
  8. Jensen MD, Nathan T, Rafaelsen SR, Kjeldsen J (2011) Diagnostic accuracy of capsule endoscopy for small bowel Crohn's disease is superior to that of MR enterography or CT enterography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 9: 124-129. View
  9. Tukey M, Pleskow D, Legnani P, Cheifetz AS, Moss AC (2009) The utility of capsule endoscopy in patients with suspected Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol 104: 2734-2739. View
  10. Figueiredo P, Almeida N, Lopes S, Duque G, Freire P, et al. (2010) Smallbowel capsule endoscopy in patients with suspected Crohn's diseasediagnostic value and complications. Diagn Ther Endosc 2010. View
  11. Mergener K, Ponchon T, Gralnek I, Pennazio M, Gay G, et al. (2007) Literature review and recommendations for clinical application of smallbowel capsule endoscopy, based on a panel discussion by international experts. Consensus statements for small-bowel capsule endoscopy, 2006/2007. Endoscopy 39: 895-909. View
  12. Rosa B, Moreira MJ, Rebelo A, Cotter J (2012) Lewis Score: a useful clinical tool for patients with suspected Crohn's Disease submitted to capsule endoscopy. J Crohns Colitis 6: 692-697. View
  13. Herrerías JM, Caunedo A, Rodríguez-Téllez M, Pellicer F, Herrerías JM Jr (2003) Capsule endoscopy in patients with suspected Crohn's disease and negative endoscopy. Endoscopy 35: 564-568. View
  14. Kalla R, McAlindon ME, Drew K, Sidhu R (2013) Clinical utility of capsule endoscopy in patients with Crohn's disease and inflammatory bowel disease unclassified. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 25: 706-713. View
  15. Cotter J, Dias de Castro F2, Moreira MJ3, Rosa B4 (2014) Tailoring Crohn's disease treatment: the impact of small bowel capsule endoscopy. J Crohns Colitis 8: 1610-1615. View
  16. Long MD, Barnes E, Isaacs K, Morgan D, Herfarth HH (2011) Impact of capsule endoscopy on management of inflammatory bowel disease: a single tertiary care center experience. Inflamm Bowel Dis 17: 1855-1862. View
  17. Pons Beltrán V, Nos P, Bastida G, Beltrán B, Argüello L, et al. (2007) Evaluation of postsurgical recurrence in Crohn's disease: a new indication for capsule endoscopy? Gastrointest Endosc 66: 533-540. View
  18. Bourreille A, Jarry M, D'Halluin PN, Ben-Soussan E, Maunoury V, et al. (2006) Wireless capsule endoscopy versus ileocolonoscopy for the diagnosis of postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease: a prospective study. Gut 55: 978-983. View
  19. Efthymiou A, Viazis N, Mantzaris G, Papadimitriou N, Tzourmakliotis D, et al. (2008) Does clinical response correlate with mucosal healing in patients with Crohn's disease of the small bowel? A prospective, case-series study using wireless capsule endoscopy. Inflamm Bowel Dis14: 1542-1547. View
  20. Swaminath A, Legnani P, Kornbluth A (2010) Video capsule endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease: past, present, and future redux. Inflamm Bowel Dis 16: 1254-1262. View
  21. Niv E, Fishman S, Kachman H, Arnon R, Dotan I (2014) Sequential capsule endoscopy of the small bowel for follow-up of patients with known Crohn's disease. J Crohns Colitis 8: 1616-1623. View
  22. Riccioni ME, Urgesi R, Cianci R, Bizzotto A, Spada C, et al. (2012) Colon capsule endoscopy: Advantages, limitations and expectations. Which novelties? World J Gastrointest Endosc 4: 99-107. View
  23. Eliakim R, Fireman Z, Gralnek IM, Yassin K, Waterman M, et al. (2006) Evaluation of the PillCam Colon capsule in the detection of colonic pathology: results of the first multicenter, prospective, comparative study. Endoscopy 38: 963-970. View
  24. Romero-Vazquez J, Arguelles-Arias F, Garcia-Montes JM, Caunedo- Alvarez A, Pellicer-Bautista FJ, et al. (2014) Capsule endoscopy in patients refusing conventional endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 20: 7424-7433. View
  25. Spada C, Hassan C, Galmiche JP, Neuhaus H, Dumonceau JM, et al. (2012) Colon capsule endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 44: 527-536. View
  26. Triantafyllou K, Viazis N, Tsibouris P, Zacharakis G, Kalantzis C, et al. (2014) Colon capsule endoscopy is feasible to perform after incomplete colonoscopy and guides further workup in clinical practice. Gastrointest Endosc 79: 307-316. View
  27. Ladas SD, Triantafyllou K, Spada C, Riccioni ME, Rey JF, et al. (2010) European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE): recommendations (2009) on clinical use of video capsule endoscopy to investigate small-bowel, esophageal and colonic diseases. Endoscopy 42: 220-227. View
  28. Adler S, Hassan C, Metzger Y, Sompolinsky Y, Spada C (2012) Accuracy of automatic detection of small-bowel mucosa by second-generation colon capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 76: 1170-1174. View
  29. Cotter J, de Castro FD1, Magalhães J1, Moreira MJ, Rosa B (2013) Finding the solution for incomplete small bowel capsule endoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 5: 595-599. View
  30. Spada C, Hassan C, Galmiche JP, Neuhaus H, Dumonceau JM, et al. (2012) Colon capsule endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 44: 527-536. View
  31. Spada C, Hassan C, Munoz-Navas M, Neuhaus H, Deviere J, et al. (2011) Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 74: 581-589. View
  32. Eliakim R, Yassin K, Niv Y, Metzger Y, Lachter J, et al. (2009) Prospective multicenter performance evaluation of the second-generation colon capsule compared with colonoscopy. Endoscopy 41: 1026-1031. View
  33. Ye CA, Gao YJ, Ge ZZ, Dai J, Li XB, et al. (2013) PillCam colon capsule endoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of severity and extent of ulcerative colitis. J Dig Dis 14: 117-24. View
  34. Hosoe N, Matsuoka K, Naganuma M, Ida Y, Ishibashi Y, et al. (2013) Applicability of second-generation colon capsule endoscope to ulcerative colitis: a clinical feasibility study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 28: 1174-1179. View
  35. D'Haens GR, Franchimont D, Lowenberg M, Ponsioen C, Bossuyt P, et al. (2014) Assessment of the Performance of the Colonic PillCam Pcce-2 in Patients With Active Crohn's Disease: A Pilot Study. AGA 1: Tu1531. View
  36. Meister T, Heinzow HS, Domagk D, Dortgolz A, Lenze F, et al. (2013) Colon capsule endoscopy versus standard colonoscopy in assessing disease activity of ulcerative colitis: a prospective trial. Tech Coloproctol 17: 641- 646. View
  37. Remes-Troche JM, Jimenez-Garcia VA, Garcia-Montes JM, Hergueta- Delgado P, Roesch-Dietlen F, et al. (2013) Application of colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) to evaluate the whole gastrointestinal tract: a comparative study of single-camera and dual-camera analysis. Clinical and experimental gastroenterology 6: 185-92. View
  38. Swain P (2008) The future of wireless capsule endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 14: 4142-4145. View
  39. Ciuti G, Donlin R, Valdastri P, Arezzo A, Menciassi A, et al. (2010) Robotic versus manual control in magnetic steering of an endoscopic capsule. Endoscopy 42: 148-152. View
  40. Swain P, Toor A, Volke F, Keller J, Gerber J, et al. (2010) Remote magnetic manipulation of a wireless capsule endoscope in the esophagus and stomach of humans (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 71: 1290-1293. View
  41. Rey JF, Ogata H, Hosoe N, Ohtsuka K, Ogata N, et al. (2010) Feasibility of stomach exploration with a guided capsule endoscope. Endoscopy 42: 541-545. View
  42. Keller J, Fibbe C, Volke F, Gerber J, Mosse AC, et al. (2011) Inspection of the human stomach using remote-controlled capsule endoscopy: a feasibility study in healthy volunteers (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 73: 22-28. View
  43. Rey JF, Ogata H, Hosoe N, Ohtsuka K, Ogata N, et al. (2012) Blinded nonrandomized comparative study of gastric examination with a magnetically guided capsule endoscope and standard videoendoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 75: 373-81. View
  44. Gralnek IM, Defranchis R, Seidman E, Leighton JA, Legnani P, et al. (2008) Development of a capsule endoscopy scoring index for small bowel mucosal inflammatory change. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 27: 146-154. View
  45. Niv Y, Ilani S, Levi Z, Hershkowitz M, Niv E, et al. (2012) Validation of the Capsule Endoscopy Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CECDAI or Niv score): a multicenter prospective study. Endoscopy 44: 21-26. View