Profile
International Journal of Gynecology & Clinical Practices Volume 2 (2015), Article ID 1:IJGCP-112, 3 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.15344/2394-4986/2015/112
Case Report
A Case Report of a Pregnant Gene Carrier of Spinal Muscular Atrophy

Emi Kondo1,2, Keiichi Matsubara1*, Yuko Matsubara1, Miki Mori1, Yuka Uchikura1, Katsuko Takagi1, Toru Fujioka1 and Takashi Matsumoto1

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ehime University School of Medicine, Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime 791-0295, Japan
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Hospital Organization, Kokura Medical Center, Kitakyu-syu, Japan
Dr. Keiichi Matsubara, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ehime University School of Medicine. Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime 791-0295, Japan, Tel: +81-89-960-5379; E-mail: keiichi@m.ehime-u.ac.jp
06 April 2015; 10 May 2015; 12 May 2015
Kondo E, Matsubara K, Matsubara Y, Mori M, Uchikura Y, et al. (2015) A Case Report of a Pregnant Gene Carrier of Spinal Muscular Atrophy. Int J Gynecol Clin Pract 2: 112. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15344/2394-4986/2015/112

Abstract

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disease characterized by degeneration of spinal cord motor neurons, atrophy of skeletal muscles, and generalized weakness. It is caused by gene deletions or other mutations in the survival motor neuron 1 gene on chromosome 5q13. There are three types of SMA. Of these types, SMA type 1 (SMA1) is distinguished by the disease onset before 6 months of age and death within the first two years of life. We report a case study of a pregnant SMA1 gene carrier for whom a prenatal diagnosis was performed. The woman delivered a healthy baby, and she was free of anxiety due to the prenatal diagnosis. The case was a 34-year-old woman with a history of giving birth to children with SMA1(3 gravida 2 para). The first baby was diagnosed with SMA1 and died 9 months later. During her second pregnancy, the fetus was prenatally diagnosed with SMA1, and the parents chose to have an artificial abortion. In her third pregnancy, the fetus was prenatally diagnosed as a gene carrier of SMA1 and was delivered. During her fourth pregnancy, a prenatal diagnosis was performed using amniocentesis after genetic counseling, and the fetus was diagnosed as a gene carrier of SMA1. A 3.310 g female baby was delivered with Apgar scores of 9 at 1 minute and 9 at 5 minutes. When a prenatal diagnosis of SMA is performed, various guidelines should be followed, and the patient should be provided with genetic counseling.


1. Case Report

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a common fatal autosomal recessive disorder in children characterized by progressive degeneration of motor neurons. The incidence of SMA is approximately one in 10,000 live births and the carrier frequency is as high as one in 50 [1]. The mutation rate of de novo rearrangements in SMA patients is only approximately 2% [2]. Therefore, SMA carrier screening is important, particularly when consanguineous marriage increases the risk of the disease in children.

According to the modified criteria of the International SMA Consortium, childhood-onset SMA is classified into three subtypes based on age of onset and achieved motor function [3]. SMA type 1 (SMA1) is the severe type, with onset usually before 6 months of life. SMA1 patients are never able to sit without support, and death usually occurs within 2 years of life. SMA type 2 (SMA2) is the intermediate type, with onset before 18 months of age. SMA2 patients are able to sit but unable to stand or walk unaided and death usually occurs before adulthood. SMA type 3 (SMA3) is the mild type, with onset usually after 18 months of age. SMA3 patients are able to stand and walk, and have a long life span.

In 1990, the locus of the SMA gene was identified on chromosome 5q13 [4-6]. Then in 1995, two candidate genes for SMA were reported: the survival motor neuron (SMN) gene [7] and the apoptosisinhibitory protein (NAIP) gene [8]. There are two copies of the SMN gene: teromeric (SMN1) and duplicated centromeric (SMN2) [7] (Figure 1). These two genes differ by only two nucleotides resulting in alternative splicing at the junction of intron 6 to exon 8 [7,9]. Among SMA patients, 80-90% have homozygous deletions of the SMN1 gene [10]. In contrast, only 2-3% of carriers and controls have homozygous deletions of the SMN2 gene [10]. Most SMA cases result from mutations of the SMN1 gene. In addition, the NAIP gene, which is located adjacent to the SMN gene, is deleted in 45% of patients with SMA1 and in 18% of patients with SMA2 and SMA3 [8]. Therefore, the NAIP gene is thought to be associated with the severity of SMA.

figure 1
Figure 1: Genetic map of SMA-associated genes on chromosome 5.

Recently, successful prenatal diagnoses of SMA1 have been described in some reports [11-13]. Identifying a SMN1 gene mutation in the proband makes it possible to diagnose fetal SMA using amniocentesis or chorionic villous sampling. In the present report, we describe a case of prenatal gene diagnosis of SMA1.

A 34-year-old pregnant woman, 3 gravida 2 multipara, was referred to our department at 12 weeks gestation for genetic counseling. There was no family history concerning hereditary disease. Moreover, there was no consanguineous marriage in the family. The couple’s first child was died at the age of 9 months of SMA1. Genetic analysis demonstrated that the SMN1 gene was homozygously absent in the child, and both parents were identified as SMA carriers because they had heterozygous deletions of the SMN1 gene. In the second pregnancy, the fetus was prenatally diagnosed with SMA1 by chorionic villus sampling and an artificial abortion was performed. In the third pregnancy, the fetus was shownnot to be affected with SMA1 using amniocentesis, and ahealthy child was delivered (Figure 2).

figure 2
Figure 2: Family tree of this case.

In the current pregnancy, prenatal gene analysis was performed at 16 weeks gestation using amniocentes is after genetic counseling. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out on SMN1 exons 7 and 8. The results indicated that the fetus was a SMA carrier like the parents becausethe fetus had a single SMN1 copy. A 3.310 g female baby was born via vaginal delivery at a gestational age of 38 weeks.The apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes were 9 and 9, respectively.

2. Discussion

Since Daniels et al. performed the first prenatal diagnosis of SMA1 in 1992 [14], SMN1 gene deletions have been found in more than 98% of patients with SMA [15], and point mutations have also been reported [7]. The pathogenesis of SMA involves SMN1 gene dysfunction, and the severity of SMA is related to SMN2 gene dysfunction [16]. Accurate dosage analysis of the SMN gene copy number using a quantitative PCR assay can be used to diagnose SMA carriers and patients [17]. Presently, chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis can be used to retrieve fetal cells for genetic testing [18,19]. In the future, genetic analysis of circulating fetal cells in the maternal peripheral blood could be applied to make clinical diagnosis of SMA [20]. Because SMA has no effective treatment, appropriate genetic counseling should be provided with genetic testing to allow families to consider the future of the fetus [21]. It is important to be aware that the carrier test may not identify all carriers, and there is a possibility of false negative results [22]. Furthermore, the risk in the next pregnancy when the two parents are carriers is 25%, with the exception of de novo rearrangements.

The reliability of prenatal diagnosis of SMA1 depends on the certainty of the clinical diagnosis in the proband [23]. If deletion of the SMN1 gene is not confirmed in the proband, then it is difficult to make a decision to undertake an invasive procedure for prenatal diagnosis.

3. Conclusion

Genetic counseling is important for couples undergoing SMA1 testing. It is particularly crucial if a couple decides to terminate a pregnancy due to the results of a genetic test because it may be difficult to digest a sense of loss. In these cases, it is also necessary to counsel parents on the risk of recurrence in a subsequent pregnancy.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests exit.

Author Contributions

All the authors substantially contributed to the study conception and design as well as the acquisition and interpretation of the data and drafting the manuscript.


References

  1. Prior TW; Professional Practice and Guidelines Committee (2008) Carrier screening for spinal muscular atrophy. Genet Med 10: 840-842 [Google Scholar]
  2. Wirth B, Schmidt T, Hahnen E, Rudnik-Schöneborn S, Krawczak M, et al. (1997) De novo rearrangements found in 2% of index patients with spinal muscular atrophy: mutational mechanisms, parental origin, mutation rate, and implications for genetic counseling. Am J Hum Genet 61: 1102-1111 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Zerres K, Rudnik-Schöneborn S (1995) Natural history in proximal spinal muscular atrophy. Clinical analysis of 445 patients and suggestions for a modification of existing classifications. Arch Neurol 52: 518-523 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Brzustowicz LM, Lehner T, Castilla LH, Penchaszadeh GK, Wilhelmsen KC, et al. (1990) Genetic mapping of chronic childhood-onset spinal muscular atrophy to chromosome 5q11.2-13.3. Nature 344: 540-541 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Melki J, Abdelhak S, Sheth P, Bachelot MF, Burlet P, et al. (1990) Gene for chronic proximal spinal muscular atrophies maps to chromosome 5q. Nature 344: 767-768 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Gilliam TC, Brzustowicz LM, Castilla LH, Lehner T, Penchaszadeh GK, et al. (1990) Genetic homogeneity between acute and chronic forms of spinal muscular atrophy. Nature 345: 823-825 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Lefebvre S, Bürglen L, Reboullet S, Clermont O, Burlet P, et al. (1995) Identification and characterization of a spinal muscular atrophy-determining gene. Cell 80: 155-165 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Roy N, Mahadevan MS, McLean M, Shutler G, Yaraghi Z, et al. (1995) The gene for neuronal apoptosis inhibitory protein is partially deleted in individuals with spinal muscular atrophy. Cell 80: 167-178 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Monani UR, Lorson CL, Parsons DW, Prior TW, Androphy EJ, et al. (1999) A single nucleotide difference that alters splicing patterns distinguishes the SMA gene SMN1 from the copy gene SMN2. Hum Mol Genet 8: 1177-1183 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Samilchuk E, D'Souza B, Bastaki L, al-Awadi S (1996) Deletion analysis of the SMN and NAIP genes in Kuwaiti patients with spinal muscular atrophy. Hum Genet 98: 524-527 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Kekou K, Sofocleous C, Konstantinidis G, Fryssira H, Mavrou A, et al. (2015) SMA prenatal diagnosis: a modified protocol to help differentiation between deletions and gene conversion. Mol Cell Probes 29: 71-73 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Khaniani MS, Derakhshan SM, Abasalizadeh S (2013) Prenatal diagnosis of spinal muscular atrophy: clinical experience and molecular genetics of SMN gene analysis in 36 cases. J Prenat Med 7: 32-34 [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Jiang W, Ji X, Xu Y, Qu X, Sun W, et al. (2013) Molecular prenatal diagnosis of autosomal recessive spinal muscular atrophies using quantification polymerase chain reaction. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 17: 438-442 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Daniels RJ, Suthers GK, Morrison KE, Thomas NH, Francis MJ, et al. (1992) Prenatal prediction of spinal muscular atrophy. J Med Genet 29: 165-170 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Somerville MJ, Hunter AG, Aubry HL, Korneluk RG, MacKenzie AE, et al. (1997) Clinical application of the molecular diagnosis of spinal muscular atrophy: deletions of neuronal apoptosis inhibitor protein and survival motor neuron genes. Am J Med Genet 69: 159-165 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Dhamcharee V, Mutirangura A, Tannirandom Y, Jongpiputvanich S, Romyanan O (1999) Prenatal prediction of spinal muscular atrophy by SMN deletion analysis. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 30 Suppl 2: 186-187 [PubMed]
  17. McAndrew PE, Parsons DW, Simard LR, Rochette C, Ray PN, et al. (1997) Identification of proximal spinal muscular atrophy carriers and patients by analysis of SMNT and SMNC gene copy number. Am J Hum Genet 60: 1411-1422 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Kesari A, Rennert H, Leonard DG, Phadke SR, Mittal B (2005) Prenatal diagnosis of spinal muscular atrophy: Indian scenario. Prenat Diagn 25: 641-644 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Wu T, Ding XS, Li WL, Yao J, Deng XX (2005) Prenatal diagnosis of spinal muscular atrophy in Chinese by genetic analysis of fetal cells. Chin Med J (Engl) 118: 1274-1277 [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. Béroud C, Karliova M, Bonnefont JP, Benachi A, Munnich A, et al. (2003) Prenatal diagnosis of spinal muscular atrophy by genetic analysis of circulating fetal cells. Lancet 361: 1013-1014 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Watihayati MS, Zabidi-Hussin AM, Tang TH, Matsuo M, Nishio H, et al. (2007) Deletion analyses of SMN1 and NAIP genes in Malaysian spinal muscular atrophy patients. Pediatr Int 49: 11-14 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Prior TW; Professional Practice and Guidelines Committee (2008) Carrier screening for spinal muscular atrophy. Genet Med 10: 840-842 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Cobben JM, de Visser M, Scheffer H, Osinga J, van der Steege G, et al. (1993) Confirmation of clinical diagnosis in requests for prenatal prediction of SMA type I. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 56: 319-321 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]