Profile
International Journal of Earth & Environmental Sciences Volume 6 (2021), Article ID 6:IJEES-191, 15 pages
https://doi.org/10.15344/2456-351X/2021/191
Original Article
Combination of Carbon and Nitrogen Isotopes for Assessment of Soil Organic Matter in Yunnan Karst Area -Guizhou Plateau, Southwestern China

Howard Omar Beckford1*, Chang-shun Song2,3, Cheng Chang1 and Hong-bing Ji1,2

1School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
2State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang 550002, China
3Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory of Geographic State Monitoring of Watershed, Guizhou Education University, Guiyang 550018, China
Mr. Howard Omar Beckford, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Xueyuan Road No. 30, Haidian District, Beijing-100083, P.R. China, Tel: +86-13121020220, Fax: +86-10-62332750; E-mail: howbecky@yahoo.com
08 December 2021; 27 December 2021; 29 December 2021
Beckford HO, Song CS, Chang C, Ji HB (2021) Combination of Carbon and Nitrogen Isotopes for Assessment of Soil Organic Matter in Yunnan Karst Area -Guizhou Plateau, Southwestern China. Int J Earth Environ Sci 6: 191. doi: https://doi.org/10.15344/2456-351X/2021/191
This work was jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) grants (Nos. 41473122, 41073096), National Key Basic Research Program of China (2013CB956702) and the Hundred Talents Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Abstract

Soil organic matter (SOM) has substantial influence on geochemical cycle, soil stability and global climate change. Information on SOM source, carbon and nitrogen dynamics in ecologically fragile karst ecosystems is lacking; especially in upland rocky desertification areas. Therefore, four typical soil profile varying degrees of disturbance in Yunnan Karst area -Guizhou Plateau, southwestern China were selected and parameters such as total organic carbon (TOC), nitrogen (TN), δ13C and δ15N were assessed. The small δ13C variation (-15.64 to -25.82‰) in SOM reflect the coexistence of C3 and C4 plants with no indication of vegetation change. The increase in δ13C and δ15N in the upper soil layers indicate mineralization and selective preservation, while the decrease at depth indicates mixing of 13C-depleted SOM and translocation of dissolved organic carbon. Conversely, the irregular fluctuation in δ15N is linked to mineralization, nitrification and denitrification due to heterogeneity of karst soils. The coupled negative correlation between δ13C and δ15N indicates low soil N utilization efficiency and mixing of isotopically distinctive carbon and nitrogen source. The results further revealed strong positive correlations in C/N ratios versus TOC (r2= 0.79, 0.84, 0.94, 0.94) and TN (r2 = 0.73, 0.81). Variation in TOC, TN, δ13C and δ15N were influenced by vegetation cover, topography, hydrogeological condition and disturbance. This karst rocky desertification area has the characteristic of native forest with limited vegetation cover that had experienced erosion, leaching, inefficiency in N utilization with degree of disturbance. Our findings suggest that urgent attention and control measures are needed to improve soil quality and stability in rocky karst desertification areas.


1. Introduction

Soil is widely known to be a major reservoir of soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil organic nitrogen (SON), which plays an important role in reducing CO2 in the atmosphere, hence regulating the global carbon cycle and climate system [1]. In addition, SOC also helps in maintaining soil fertility and environmental quality [2-4]. Recently, with increasing anthropogenic activities and climate change, the spatial and temporal variation in SOC has gained much attention [4,5]. The tropical and subtropical region of southwestern China is one of the largest continuous karsts in the world, and had experienced significant environmental degradation in the twentieth century [6]. In particular, the Yunnan karst region-Guizhou (Y-G) is approximately 42.6 × 104 km2 with a population of approximately 100 million people [7]. Due to anthropogenic activities, such as agriculture, deforestation, mining and construction of roads, the area is exposed to severe soil erosion and rocky desertification [8]. Studies have reported that anthropogenic activities affect SOC, SON storage, greenhouse gas emissions, inorganic N loss, and soil structure [9]. However, little information is known on carbon and nitrogen dynamics within karst rocky desertification areas. Hence, it is important to fully understand the spatial temporal variation and behaviour of soil C and N within this environment.

Stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen are often used by researchers to determine the origin of soil organic matter [10] as well as processes that govern cycling [11-13,9,14]. In terrestrial karst ecosystems, several researchers successfully used stable carbon isotope signature in soils to identify sources and turnover of SOC [15,16,9]. Terrestrial plant groups have different photosynthetic pathways that registered distinct isotopic signatures. For example, C3 plants (Calvin-Benson cycle) [17] and C4 plants (Hatch-Slack cycle) [18]. The δ13C value of SOM from present vegetation cover consists of C3 and C4 plant δ13C values between the ranges of -23‰ to -30‰ (avg. -27‰) and -9‰ to -17‰ (avg. -13‰) respectively [17]. Therefore, C3 and C4 plants have distinct δ13C values which differ from each other by approximately 14‰ [17]. However, the decomposition of soil organic matter by microbes can alter fractionation and complicate the contribution of C3 or C4 plants, thereby hindering the accurate interpretation of SOM sources and estimation of its turnover [19]. At present, stable carbon isotope has been widely used and studied across several ecosystems e.g. natural forest, artificial forest, grassland, shrubland, farmland and wetland [4,9]. In addition to understanding the behaviour and biological fractionation, the study of carbon and nitrogen dynamics in upland karst rocky desertification area is also critical as it may provide tighter constraints on carbon-dynamic model having biological and environmental significance [20,14]. Stable isotope (δ13C and δ15N) techniques and C/N ratios are robust tools that have been commonly used to determine sources, mixing and transformational activities in terrestrial, estuarine and coastal systems [21-23]. Since the magnitude and the direction of changes in SOM decomposition are still unclear in ecologically fragile upland karst desertification areas, our study aims to use δ13C and δ15N along with C/N ratio to (1) investigate the source of soil organic matter, (2) determine the change in C3 and C4 plants proportion, and (3) examine the behaviour of C and N and factors affecting SOM decomposition in the Yunnan upland rocky karst desertification area -Guizhou Plateau, southwestern China.

2. Material and methods

2.1 Study area

The study area is located in Yunnan Province (24°30'-25°03'N, 103°10'-104°40'E) (Figure 1). The topography, mainly, is comprised of highlands in the east and low mountains towards the western region. The area experiences a typical subtropical monsoon climate with warm-humid conditions from May to October and cold-dry conditions from November to April. The region average annual temperature is approximately 16.3°C, with large temperature difference between the day and night [24]. The average annual precipitation ranges between 800-850 mm, with almost 70% occurring during the wet season. The typical characteristic feature of the area is karst mountain landform, with few exposed limestone rocks and thin soil deposit. The soil types are characterized as red soil and limestone soil [25-27] and classified as Mollic Inceptisols [28]. The dominant lithologies in the area are mainly Limestone of Permian period, Limestone and Dolomite of Middle-Lower Cambrian and Slate, with Limestone of Sinian period. The soil in the area is susceptible to erosion and water loss as there is limited means of protection from the sparsely stunt vegetation cover resulting in severe rocky desertification.

figure 1
Figure 1: Map showing location of study area, elevation maps and aerial photographs of the sample profiles at Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau, Southwestern China.

2.2 Soil profile and sampling

The study sites were selected through indoor research and field surveys, sites with similarly high upland elevation, with limestone bedrock, and affected by different degree of rocky desertification and human interference were selected. Four typical soil profiles located in upland landform were identified and labelled as SL1, SL2, XNC and DP over carbonate bedrock. The location, elevation, thickness and the visible characteristics of the soil profiles are described in Table 1.

table 1
Table 1: Soil profile, location, elevation, thickness and visible characteristicsof four studied profiles from karst area in Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau of southwestern China.

Shilin Scenic Area 1 (SL1) soil profile is located in the undeveloped section of Shilin near the Stone Forest scenic area at an elevation of 1770 m, with GPS coordinates of 24°48'N; 103°18'E (Figure 1, Table 1). The sampling point is located at the top of the hill, with a relatively flat terrain and the immediate surrounding strata is bare. However, the surrounding vegetation cover is relatively high and mainly consists of shrubs and herbaceous plants. Some of the plant species include Ligustrum lucidum, Eucommia ulmoides and Artemisia annua. Fresh soil samples were collected at an interval of 5 cm from top to bottom of the profile. The samples were numbered and labeled from SL1-1 to SL1-10, respectively to a maximum depth of 50 cm. The dominant bedrock was Limestone of Permian period and the bedrock sample (SL1-0) collected at 100 cm. A total of 10 soil samples with soil bulk density ranging from 1.14 - 2.04 g/cm3 were collected (Table 2).

table 2
Table 2: Depth profile distribution of pH, soil bulk density, TOC, TN, C/N, δ15N, δ13C and Clay proportion for four studied soil profiles from karst area in Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau of southwestern China.

Shilin Scenic Area 2 (SL2) soil profile is located at an altitude of 1730 m, 24°48'N; 103°18'E (Figure 1, Table 1). The SL2 sample profile is located on a steep hillside slope. The surrounding area comprised of bare rocks with relatively low vegetation cover consisting of predominantly shrubs. Some of the common plant species include Ligustrum lucidum, Pinus massoniana, Eucommia ulmoides, Pinus elliottii, and Artemisia annua. The soil profile is naturally developed and without any visible sign of human disturbance. Fresh soil samples were collected at an interval of 12 cm from top to bottom of the profile. The samples were numbered and labeled from SL2-1 to SL2- 10, respectively to a maximum depth of 113 cm. Limestone bedrock sample (SL2-0) was also collected at 163 cm. A total of 10 soil samples with soil bulk density ranging from 1.16 - 2.30 g/cm3 were collected (Table 2).

The Xinacun (XNC) soil profile is located at an elevation of 1720 m (24°49'6"N; 103°18'37"E) (Figure 1, Table 1), on a mountain slope close to a road construction site. This sample profile was a vertical man-made section established by an excavator. The upper surface of this profile comprised of weeds, shrubs and tall trees with loose soil containing plant roots and black humus. The dominant plant species were mainly Pinus massoniana, Eucommia ulmoides, Pteridium aquilinum, Miscanthus floridulus and Imperata cylindrica. No bedrock was present in this excavated soil profile. However, the underlying bedrock was found in close proximity and identified as Limestone and Dolomite of Middle-Lower Cambrian. Fresh soil samples were collected starting at 10 cm, intervals from top to bottom of the profile. The samples were numbered and labeled as XNC-1 to XNC-11, respectively to a maximum depth of 245 cm. A total of 11 soil samples were collected with soil bulk density ranging from 1.4 - 2.11 g/cm3 (Table 2).

The Dapo (DP) soil profile is located at an elevation of 1920 m (24°50'21"N; 103°23'26"E) (Figure 1, Table 1) in the lower gully region of the upland landscape. The area comprised of thatched grass, few shrubs and small number of coniferous trees. The underlying bedrock of this profile is Slate, Phyllite, Siltstone intercalated with Limestone of Sinian period. Fresh soil samples were collected at an interval of 10 cm from top to bottom of the profile. The samples were numbered and labeled from DP-1 to DP-10, respectively to a maximum depth of 115 cm. The bedrock sample (DP-0) was also collected at 145 cm. A total of 10 soil samples, with soil bulk density ranging from 1.13 - 2.08 g/cm3 were collected (Table 2).

Each studied soil profile has different depth varying in thickness and ranging from 50-245 cm. In order to captured and represent the changes, soil sampling was done according to the genetic horizons of each profile. Hence, soil samples were collected at varying intervals, however all the soil profiles were chosen with thickness >50 cm so as to compare the changes of TOC and TN contents and their stable isotope compositions with depth.

2.3 Soil preparation and analysis

All soil samples collected were naturally air dried at room temperature and impurities such as plant roots, gravel, and other debris were removed. Soil samples were later ground and pass through a 200-mesh size sieve to remove larger fragments. The samples were then placed in zip lock bags for later determination of total organic carbon (TOC), total nitrogen (TN), C/N ratio, nitrogen and carbon isotopes (δ15N and δ13C).

The soil pH values were determined by the “China agricultural standard - soil pH determination” (NY-T 1377-2007). The total soil bulk density was determined based on “NF X31-510-1993” soil quality and the paraffin coating method. The powder soil sample was pretreated with 1mol/L HCl, and the carbonate minerals were removed [29]. The inorganic N were removed using 2 mol L-1 potassium chloride (KCl) for 24 hours [30]. The samples were washed with deionized water until the supernatant liquid pH value was neutral and then later dried at 60°C. Approximately 100 mg of sieved dried soil sample was used for analysis of TOC, TN and stable isotopes contents. The TOC and TN contents were calibrated due to loss of carbonate and inorganic N respectively. The TOC and TN contents were determined by using an elemental analyzer (Elementar, Vario TOC cube, Germany) with a precision of C ± 0.1% and N ± 0.02%, monitored with standard samples. The stable carbon isotope ratio (13C/12C) and stable nitrogen isotope ratio (15N/14N) were determined by using the gas isotope ratio mass spectrometer (MAT-252, Germany). Testing was done by the State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry. The measurements were normalized according to international standards material (δ13CVPDB: 45.6‰ ± 0.08‰; δ15NAir: 0.24‰ ± 0.13‰), and expressed as delta value (δ13C and δ15N) notation (‰) relative to Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite (VPDB) and atmospheric air, respectively, whereby: δ13C (‰) = [(15C/12C) sample - (13C/12C) standard] / (13C/12C) standard × 1000 and δ15N (‰) = [(15N/14N) sample - (15N/14N) standard] / (15N/14N) standard × 1000. Measurements of δ13C and δ15N were conducted routinely with a precision of ±0.1‰ and ±0.2‰, respectively. Samples were analyzed in duplicate with result differences within the range of measurement accuracy according to the standard material measured values.

2.4 Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed by Origin 8.5 (OriginLab, MA, USA). The relationships among the parameters TOC, TN, C/N, δ13C and δ15N contents with soil depth, soil pH, clay proportion and soil bulk density were determined by linear regression analysis.

3. Results

3.1 Vertical distribution of soil physicochemical properties in soil profiles

As illustrated in Figure 2 the pH values of the studied soil profiles vary from 4.05 to 6.09, which are slightly acidic in nature, however DP soil profile tend to be more acidic with average pH value of 4.23 (Figure 2d). There were slight fluctuations in pH values with increasing soil depth, with the upper soil surface being more acidic than rest of the profile except for SL1 and DP soil profiles. The soil bulk density ranges from 1.13 g cm-3 to 2.30 g cm-3 with DP and SL2 profiles recording the lowest and highest soil bulk density respectively (Figure 2). The high soil bulk density recorded in SL2-7 correspond to high sand content (45%) and low clay content (9.1%). The TOC content within the studied soil profiles showed high variation with soil depth with a general decrease from upper soil surface to lower layers down to bedrock (Figure 2). The TN content tends to vary with soil depth for the studied soil profiles. Generally, there seem to be a decrease in TN with increasing soil depth (Figure 2). The SL1 soil profile is notably higher in TN content in comparison to the other profiles. SL1 profile immediate surrounding vegetation consists of mainly shrubs and herbaceous plants which may account for the relatively high TN content as well as the rearing of animals in the area.

figure 2
Figure 2: Depth profiles characteristics of pH, soil bulk density, TOC, TN and C/N ratio of the four soil profiles from karst area in Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau of southwestern China.

The studied soil profiles C/N values have high degree of variability, with values ranging from 1.5 (XNC) to 13.4 (SL1) with an average of 6.60±4.02. The general trend indicates a gradual reduction in C/N values from the topsoil to the bottom of the soil profile layer (Figure 2). There is an obvious difference in the upper topsoil C/N ratio of all studied soil profiles (>10), which may indicate that plant residues or animals input contributes to the relatively high C/N value in the upper soil surface. The degree of human disturbance or interference may also influence the migration and transformation of nitrogen, resulting in C/N variation at different layers within the soil profiles. Table 2 also shows the clay proportion depth distributions of the four studied soil profiles. All soil samples at various depths were dominated by silt and sand (average 82.37%), while clay fractions accounted for only 7.90 to 36.63% (average 17.6%) in an increasing order of XNC, SL2, SL1 and DP soil profiles. The highest clay content generally recorded in the sub-soil layers, while the lowest value recorded in the upper surface except for DP soil profile.

3.2 Isotopic composition

The δ13C and δ15N isotopic compositions of the four studied soil profiles from Yunnan Plateau, Southwestern China are presented in Figure 3. The overall δ13C and δ15N values ranged from -15.64‰ to -25.82‰ and from 2.77‰ to 14.36‰ respectively and vary with soil depth. The general trend indicates that δ13C values increased with depth for the initial 0-20 cm for the soil profiles except for DP soil profile and the lower section of the profiles which indicate a decrease in δ13C values with depth. On the other hand, the δ15N values varied rapidly with depth with no obvious trend (Figure 3).

figure 3
Figure 3: Depth profile distribution of δ13C and δ15N for the four soil profiles from karst area in Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau of southwestern China.

4. Discussion

4.1 Factors affecting TOC and TN vertical distribution during SOM decomposition

Land use significantly influenced the levels of the TOC and TN contents in soils, more so in the first 0-100 cm layer [31] as well as soil bulk density [32]. Several studies reported that TOC and TN contents were much higher in cropland than in native forests [33-35], while other studies reported that forest soils tend to have higher TOC and TN contents than other land use such as cropland, grassland and shrub land [36,9,31]. Our studied soil profiles are located on mountainous landform over karst rocky desertification area with relatively low TOC content in upper soil surface and at greater depth (<2.25%). The low TOC content maybe due to limited vegetation cover as indicated by field assessment coupled with the area’s susceptibility to erosion and human disturbance [37].

Soil pH, soil bulk density and clay content seem to have slight influence on TOC and TN concentration in this karst soil as they indicate weak correlations among the soil profiles (Figure 4 and 5). This may be due to the various degrees of human disturbance and the heterogeneity nature of karst soils. Other studies, for example Njeru et al. [38] have reported negative correlation among soil density, TOC and TN contents. The suppression of possible mineralization and nitrification process in soils may be the reason for the correlation with soil bulk density [39]. Furthermore, soil with low bulk density has the ability to store greater amount of TOC and TN content, as they can be mobilized through porous spaces within the soil profiles.

figure 4
Figure 4: Relationship of soil pH with (a) TOC (b) TN and soil bulk density with (c) TOC and (d) TN for the four soil profiles from karst area in Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau of southwestern China.
figure 5
Figure 5: Relationship of C/N with (a) TOC and (b) TN and clay proportion with (c) TOC and (d) TN for the four soil profiles from karst area in Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau of southwestern China.

In this study, carbon loss is facilitated by the monsoonal climatic condition as the seasonal precipitation (average 800-850 mm) impacted on the vertical translocation of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and anaerobic oxidation especially during the dry period as indicated by the sharp change in δ13C values for all sites except for DP profile (Figure 2). The observed pattern of δ13C for the soil profiles can be explained by the decomposition of TOC which directly affects isotopic composition by kinetic fractionation with preferential substrate decomposition [40]. For all the studied soil profiles except for DP, the 13C which is the heavier isotopes became enriched with increasing depth to approximately 20 cm. This clearly indicates kinetic fractionation whereby soil microorganisms during SOM decomposition preferentially removed the lighter 12C isotopes leaving behind substrate that is isotopically heavy or enriched [41,42,15]. On the other hand, at greater depth below 20 cm, the decrease in δ13C values was due to the translocation of DOC from surface to deeper depth [43]. The subsoil horizons with low carbon contents, may have dissolved organic matter (DOM) readily adsorbed to mineral surfaces, resulting in the reduction of δ13C in soil [44,43]. Furthermore, the mixing effect of organic carbon derived from bedrock and modern plant may leads to decrease in δ13C value at deeper depths [45]. Monsoonal climatic conditions influence both decomposition and translocation processes which explain the carbon gain in the upper surface and carbon loss in subsoil. Zhu and Liu [46] found similar result where δ13C values declined with depth in karst soils.

Vegetation is the primary source of TOC and TN which can significantly affect the quantity and quality of soil organic matter [47]. The low TOC content (0.28%) in the upper layer of SL1 soil profile may be due to its limited vegetation cover coupled with the susceptibility to erosion due to its geomorphic position. The SL1 soil profile is the uppermost profile with an elevation of 1770 m surrounded by few shrubs and herbaceous plant species (Figure 1). Xiong et al. [37] pointed out that this studied karst area is severely affected by physical erosion and chemical weathering. Conversely, the upper surface layer of SL2 soil profile has a much higher TOC content (2.11%) than the other soil profiles (Figure 2). This is primarily due to its location being below SL1 soil profile at an elevation of 1730 m and so benefited from erosion and deposition of SOM from higher landform (Figure 1). The other profiles upper soil surface TOC content relatively higher (0.9%) and reflect the input of freshly decomposed matter from surrounding vegetation. The exponential decrease in TOC content is consistent with some other studies [36,48,9,49,46] and is closely linked to the evolution of the soil profile [41] as well as the amount of activity from soil microbes [46]. Both the TOC and TN concentrations are influenced by the erosion of carbon rich soil from upper surface layer [50,51] and by the subsequent degree of decomposition, depositional processes, delivery routes and amount of preservation. Our results indicated that the soil profiles TN contents were positively correlated with the TOC contents (r2 =0.98, 0.99) for SL1 and SL2, however weak correlation for XNC and DP profiles respectively (Figure 6). The result implied that the carbon and nitrogen were of similar organic origin for SL1 and SL2 profiles and that soil water affected N in XNC and DP profiles. The predominant source of nitrogen is from animal residue in SL1 profile, while leaf-litter, biological nitrogen fixation, and organic matter dominate the other profiles [52]. This strong positive correlation between TOC and TN contents were found in other studies e.g., [53,54,9,55,37].

figure 6
Figure 6: Relationship between TOC and TN for the four soil profiles from karst area in Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau of southwestern China.

The C/N ratio in soil and litter may be an indicator of the rate of decomposition [46]. For example, the lower the C/N value the higher the decomposition rate [56]. In comparison to other studies for example, Liu et al. [9] found C/N values range from 8.22 to 10.52, while our study C/N ratio were >10 for all the upper surface soils, except for SL1 profile (Figure 2). These findings indicate that the upper soil surface for the studied soil profiles, have a low rate of decomposition and low accumulation. The C/N ratio reflects carbon input, therefore the relatively high C/N values in the upper surface indicate the high C content in the surrounding shrubs and herbs vegetation. Furthermore, the results also indicate that SL1 average C/N values fall in the range of cropland (disturbed) i.e., >10 (Table 3 supplementary), while the other soil profiles average C/N values reflect typical undisturbed native land (<10) according to Zhang et al. [35]. The soil C/N ratio showed strong positive correlation with TOC (r2 = 0.772, 0.822, 0.929 and 0.931) and TN contents (r2 = 0.694, 0.782) for SL1 and SL2, however weak correlation for XNC and DP soil profiles respectively (Figure 5a & b). This was directly due to influence of vegetation cover and water availability in the soil. The C/N ratio generally decreases with increasing age of SOM in soils [57] and reflects the degree of SOM decomposition [58,59]. The C/N ratios of SOM in the studied soil profiles decrease with depth except for the upper soil surface layer for SL1 (Figure 2) which recorded low C/N ratio value due to low vegetation cover and high erosion. The extremely low TOC, TN and C/N ratio coupled with the decreasing trend with soil depth experienced by this karst rocky desertification area were influence by land use, monsoonal climate, topography and vegetation cover.

table 3
Table 3: Average soil bulk density, TOC, TN and C/N of four studied soil profiles from karst area in Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau of southwestern China..

4.2 Source of soil organic matter (SOM)

Soil is a direct sink for organic carbon and nitrogen with their stable isotopic signatures registered at any depth reflecting the dominant vegetation type. Many researchers used δ13C and δ15N isotopes along with C/N ratio to better identify the origins of soil organic matter [21]. In using δ13C values, higher terrestrial C3 and C4 plant matter are considered to between -23‰ to -30‰ and -9‰ to -17‰ respectively [17], while that of soil organic matter ranges between -22‰ to -25‰ [60]. Most non-fixing nitrogen plants have δ15N values in the range of about +5‰ to ±2‰, although plants with δ15N values less than -10‰ or greater than +10‰ are not unusual [61]. Our results indicated vertical variation of δ13C for the studied soil profiles (Figure 3). The δ13C values for soil profiles ranges between -15.64‰ to -25.82‰ with an average of -20.03‰ to ±3.02.Our results indicate that some values fall in the range of C3 plants based on Boutton [17] (-23 to -30‰) and outside the C4 plants range (-9‰ to -17‰). Soil profiles for example XNC and DP have larger δ13C values range which fall in the C3 plant and soil organic matter range according to Goni et al. [60] and Thorp et al. [62] (Figure 7). The variation in isotopic signature was as a result of the mixing of both C3 and C4 plants as well as soil microbes which can hinder the contribution of C3 or C4 plants, and hence affect the accurate interpretation of SOM sources. However, for this study, the results of mixing model based on Landi et al. [63] implied that the TOC in soil profiles C3 and C4 proportion contribution vary with depth (Figure 8). The average C3 plants percentage contribution was approximately 24%, 49%; 48% and 73% for SL1, SL2, XNC and DP profiles respectively (Figure 8). In the case of SL1 profile, the soil organic matter is strongly influenced by other sources (e.g., animal residues) as evident by droppings in the area; hence the relative enrichment in δ13C values (Figure 7). Furthermore, SL1 profile surrounding vegetation consists of shrubs and herbaceous plant species which contributed to the higher proportion of C4 plants. The low value of δ13C in the upper surface of soil profiles implies that soil organic carbon mainly derived from decomposition of fresh plant matter, especially since surface horizons of soils reflect the C3 to C4 ratios of the present vegetation [64]. The δ13C values for soil profiles SL2, XNC and DP are closer to the C3 plant range, as reflected in the higher proportion of C3 plants, while SL1 profile is obviously different and closer to C4 plants range (Figure 7). The immediate surrounding vegetation of SL2, XNC and DP profiles comprised of shrubs, thatched grass, and coniferous trees species that account for the high variation in isotopic signatures. The DP soil profile, however, recorded the most depleted (-21.18‰) δ13C value in the upper soil surface than the other profiles (Figure 3). This is because DP profile which is located at the highest elevation would have the least contribution of soil deposition and accumulation from other land forms and so reflect δ13C values close to the above vegetation. In addition, at greater soil depth the slate bedrock influences the mixing effect of organic carbon thereby causing variation in δ13C values.

figure 7
Figure 7: Relationship of δ15N and δ13C for the four soil profiles from karst area in Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau of southwestern China. Illustrating isotopic signature ranges of potential sources: terrestrial C3, C4 plants and soil organic matter, data taken from Kendall et al. [61].
figure 8
Figure 8: The contribution proportions of C3 and C4 plants for the four soil profiles from karst area in Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau of southwestern China.

The δ15N values for plants are affected by the δ15N values of soil, resulting in a close relationship between soil and plant nitrogen composition in the ecosystem [65]. In addition, the influence of atmospheric deposition can also affect δ15N values in soils, for instance Southwest China wet deposition for NO 3 is 2‰ and for NO 4 + is -12‰ [66]. The input of plant organic matter and atmospheric deposition cannot explain the high δ15N values in SL1 profile. The presence of animal residue however could account for the relatively high δ15N value registered in SL1 soil profile. The other soil profiles SL2, XNC and DP, δ15N values fall within the range of C3 and C4 plants, except for one point in XNC soil profile (XNC-3 registered δ15N= 13.22). The high δ15N value in XNC profile maybe due to soil water migration and transformation of nitrogen as a result of microbial activities. Stewart et al. [67] reported that soil water processes affected reduction and oxidation environment, which control nitrification and denitrification. The δ15N values in the studied soil profiles which fluctuate with depth indicate microbial activities during mineralization, nitrification and denitrification. The enrichment of δ15N that occurred in the upper soil surface 0-20 cm of all the studied soil profiles was due to decomposition of SOM by microbes and root uptake of 15N- depleted NO 3 [68,69]. The high variability of δ15N in the subsoil was attributed to soil water processes and reduction / oxidation environment involving nitrification and denitrification [67]. The seasonal wet and dry conditions in this karst environment due to monsoonal climate facilitate intensive microbial activities in the upper surface as well as translocation of dissolve organic nitrogen at depth resulting in high variability in δ15N.

In addition to δ13C and δ15N isotopic signatures, C/N ratio can also be used to support the suggestion that the studied soil profiles comprised of mixed organic matter sources. Studies have shown that the C/N ratio of higher terrestrial plants are usually >15 [61,70] and that C/N ratio of soil organic matter is usually between 10 and 13 [71,72]. The C/N ratio of SL1 soil profile is between 10.3 and 13.4, with an average of 11.75±2.3 (n=10) (Table 3 supplementary), which suggest that the sources of organic matter are uniform and not mixed i.e., in-situ (endogenous) to the soil profile. However, the others oil profiles showed high variation in C/N ratio in the upper soil surfaces which are obviously different (>10) from the lower layers (Figure 2). This indicates that the sources of organic matter are mixed; reflecting the influence of both exogenous and endogenous sources. A weak positive correlation was observed between the δ13C and C/N ratio for the studied soil profiles, suggesting that both parameters are influenced by the same factors such as source of organic matter and decomposition rate of SOM. It is evident that the source of organic matter within this karst area of Yunnan plateau, Southwestern China has mixed contribution of C3 and C4 plants with animal residue influencing SL1 profile in particular.

4.3 Behaviour of δ13C and δ15N isotopes in karst soil profiles

In ecological studies, differences in abundance of δ13C and δ15N isotopes are important in the evaluation of changes under varying conditions of SOM decomposition and land use. Overall, our results indicate that δ13C and δ15N values varied with soil depth with δ15N values showing greater irregular fluctuation (Figure 3). Meanwhile, the general trend observed for δ13C values was enrichment in the upper soil surface layer to approximately 20 cm, followed by depletion with increasing depth. However, DP profile was an exception which indicated a decrease in δ13C values with depth (Figure 3). The increase in δ13C values of SOM with soil depth by 1-3‰ is a characteristic feature of forest soils [41,73] which indicate microbial activities during SOM decomposition. Soils dominated by aerobic decomposition have a clear increase of δ13C values with depth. This is due to preferential release of the lighter 12C isotopes during aerobic mineralization. The initial 0-20 cm soil layer in our study indicates a 1-4‰ increase which supported the general trend for forest soils. Several studies have shown that both isotopes of C and N become more enriched in the heavier isotopes with increasing soil depth [41,12,74,75,59,73,76]. In our study the observed small enrichment trend of δ13C in surface soils were related to kinetic fractionation caused by microbes rather than Suess effect or change in plant community composition as these would reflect much larger variation. In contrast soils that experience suppressed degradation due to anoxic conditions, coupled with DOC translocation usually indicate a decrease in δ13C values with depth. The decrease in δ13C values is due to enrichment of recalcitrant organic substances during anaerobic mineralization, which result in depletion of the heavier 13C. Furthermore, subsoil horizons with low carbon contents may have DOM readily adsorbed to mineral surfaces, resulting in the reduction of δ13C values in soil [44,43].

Soil δ15N values related to the nutrient input, humification and nitrogen transformation as influenced by land use and land cover change [77]. The difference in δ15N values observed were mainly due to influence of animal residues, in the case of SL1 profile as well as the differences in forest vegetation foliar N content, which depend on species, precipitation and temperature [78]. The general trend naturally for δ15N in forest soils was the presence of two pools; top surface soil with low δ15N values and subsoil with high δ15N values [79]. The vertical distribution of δ15N in this karst area showed high fluctuation which peak at depth for all the studied soil profiles (Figure 3), except for XNC soil profile which peak at 25 cm (Figure 3). This was due to the spatial dynamics of soil water processes and the influenced of reduction / oxidation reaction associated with SOM nitrification and denitrification [67]. Water availability affects the cycling of carbon and nutrients and thereby regulating the growth and distribution of microbes. Similarly, strong fluctuation in δ15N with depth were reported by Liu et al. [9] in karst watershed. The high variability pattern of δ15N distribution in these soil profiles is associated with fractionations that occur during the process of mineralization, nitrification and physical mixing. The peak of δ15N in the deeper soil profile is common with other findings [80,58,81]. This is because, at depth, microbial excretions of ammonium and nitrate become less depleted in δ15N, while the humus content of nitrogen becomes enriched, and the uptake of nitrogen by plant roots lower the δ15N abundance in the microbial reserve; hence the total soil becomes enriched [58]. In addition, further δ15N enrichment with depth may be because of N loss during high precipitation input. The high complexity of soils containing several isotopically different forms of nitrogen [82,72] resulting in N irregular behavior with the notable high variation in δ15N values with depth for the studied soil profiles. The δ15N isotopic composition in soils and groundwater may not only be influenced by its source but also by microbial activities and physical processes such as ion exchange [83].

Our results illustrate a non–conservative behaviour in δ15N that is largely due to a combination of microbial activities and water availability, which affects redox reactions (Figure 3). The monsoonal climatic condition along with the topographical features of karst environment provide the uneven distribution of soil which result in the spatial and temporal disparity in soil water [84]. Essentially, the loss of nitrate through denitrification result in enrichment of δ15N content in the remaining substrate, while during nitrification process, the lighter 15N isotope is preferentially incorporated into nitrate resulting in a decrease in δ15N [83]. Therefore, the dominant mechanism affecting δ15N within karst area of Yunnan Plateau, Southwestern China are mineralization in the upper surface, and multiple transformation processes such as translocation, nitrification and denitrification in the subsoil.

The positive and negative correlations of both δ13C and δ15N of soil TOC and TN (Figure 9) respectively, reflect isotopic fractionation associated with litter fall decomposition, microbial activities, translocation and physical mixing processes. Forest soils are characterized by litter fall and root exudates that are constantly being decomposed and gradually mixed within the soil profile [85]. The older more decomposed SOM are found lower in the soil profile as a result of further decomposition, physical mixing, leaching and vertical mobilization [86,79]. On the other hand, the newly decomposed or fresh C and N inputs are found in the upper soil profile [87].

figure 9
Figure 9: Relationship of TOC with (a) δ13C (b) δ15N and TN with (c) δ13C and (d) δ15N for the four soil profiles from karst area in Yunnan- Guizhou Plateau of southwestern China.

Coupled relationship between δ13C and δ15N was used to identify the transformation and translocation processes of SOM. Han et al. [36] reported that if a positive linear relationship occurred between δ13C and δ15N of SOM in native forest land, then soil N utilization efficiency is sufficient, that is, there is a high consistent enrichment of 13C and 15N with SOM decomposition. Our results however indicate weak negative correlation between δ13C and δ15N for the soil profiles (Figure 7). Therefore, it was interpreted that the coupling effect of C-N isotopic fractionation was not observed for this karst rocky desertification area, suggesting low N utilization efficiency. The limited vegetation cover means less uptake of N by plant root system. In addition, the negative correlation was interpreted as the mixing of isotopically distinctive carbon and nitrogen source [88,89], as well as microbial activities. Based on the δ13C and δ15N regression slope, the studied soil profiles can be placed in order of increasing disturbance and soil stability i.e., DP, XNC, SL2 and SL1 profiles respectively (Figure 7). This provides support that δ13C and δ15N isotopic assessments along with combination of other parameters can be used as a monitoring tool to determine source, transformational processes and disturbance of karst soils.

5. Conclusions

This study provides insights into sources and distribution of soil organic matter, as well as the behaviour of carbon and nitrogen isotopes within karst soils in Yunnan Plateau, Southwestern China. The joint end-member analysis of δ13C, δ15N and C/N ratios revealed that soil organic matter comprised of mixed sources derived from exogenous and endogenous materials. The small variation in δ13C values indicates that no historic change in vegetation had occurred for the soil profiles. Furthermore, the proportional contribution of C3 and C4 plants vary with soil depth, with C4 plants dominating one particular profile which was supported by field vegetation assessment. Anthropogenic activities, monsoon climate, topography, and vegetation cover were linked to the variation in TOC, TN, δ13C and δ15N contents which impacted on soil stability of this upland karst rocky desertification area.

The stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes revealed vertical variation and spatial differentiation, which reflected activities of SOM mineralization, translocation and mixing. The increase in δ13C values was influenced by mineralization and selective preservation in the upper surface while the decrease was controlled by translocation and carbon mixing in the subsoil. Conversely, the high vertical variation in δ15N were controlled by differences in the plant composition and fractionations that occurred during the process of mineralization in the upper surface, while multiple transformation processes occurred at depth.

The coupled negative correlation between δ13C and δ15N indicate the enrichment and depletion of 13C and 15N with SOM decomposition which suggest low N utilization efficiency for this karst rocky desertification area. In addition, to the mixing of isotopically distinctive carbon and nitrogen source. The findings suggest that within karst environment combination of δ13C and δ15N isotopes along with other parameters can be used as a tracer proxy to determine soil organic matter source, transformational processes and soil disturbance or stabilization.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to Professor Shijie Wang for suggestions and discussion about this study. This work was jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) grants (Nos. 41473122, 41073096), National Key Basic Research Program of China (2013CB956702) and the Hundred Talents Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Data Availability

All the data sets for this research are available in Table 1-3 of the manuscript. The data supporting Figure 2-9 in the text is available in Table 1-3.

Note: Graphy Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


References

  1. Reichstein M, Bahn M, Ciais P, Frank D, Mahecha MD, et al (2013) Climate extremes and the carbon cycle. Nature 500: 287-295. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Lal R (2004) Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma 123: 1-22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lal R (2010) Managing soils and ecosystems for mitigating anthropogenic carbon emissions and advancing global food security. BioScience 60: 708-721. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lan GY, Liu C, Wang H, Tang W, Wu X, et al. (2021) The effect of land use change and soil redistribution on soil organic carbon dynamics in karst graben basin of China. Journal of Soils and Sediments. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu C, Li ZW, Chang X, He, J, Nie X, et al. (2018) Soil carbon and nitrogen sources and redistribution as affected by erosion and deposition processes: a case study in a loess hilly-gully catchment, China. Agriculture Ecosystem Environment 253: 11-22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wang K, Zhang C, Chen H, Yue Y, Zhang W, et al. (2019) Karst landscapes of China: patterns, ecosystem processes and services. Landscape Ecol 34: 2743-2763. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Feng T, Chen H, Polyakov VO (2016) Soil erosion rates in two karst peak-cluster depression basins of northwest Guangxi, China: Comparison of the RUSLE model with 137Cs measurements. Geomorphology 253: 217-224. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Song C, Ji H, Beckford H, Chang C, Wang S, et al. (2019) Assessment of chemical weathering and physical erosion along a hillslope, southwest China. Catena 182: 104133. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Liu M, Han G, Zhang Q, Song Z (2019) Variations and Indications of δ13CSOC and δ15NSON in Soil Profiles in Karst Critical Zone Observatory (CZO), Southwest China. Sustainability 11: 2144. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Peterson BJ, Fry B (1987) Stable isotopes in ecosystem studies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 293-320. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Balesdent J, Mariotti A (1996) Measurement of soil organic matter turnover using 13C natural abundance. Mass spectrometry of soils. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ehleringer JR, Buchmann N, Flanagan LB (2000) Carbon Isotope Ratios in Belowground Carbon Cycle Processes. Ecological Applications 10: 412-422. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gill R, Burke IC, Milchunas DG, Lauenroth WK (1999) Relationship between root biomass and soil organic matter pools in the short grass steppe of eastern Colorado. Ecosystems 2: 226-236. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Poage MA, Feng X (2004) A theoretical analysis of steady state δ13C profiles of soil organic matter. Global Biogeochemical Cycle. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Han GL, Li FS, Tang Y (2015) Variations in soil organic carbon contents and isotopic compositions under different land uses in a typical karst area in Southwest China. Geochemical Journal 49: 63-71. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Li Q, Li ZY, Liang JH, He YY, Cao JH, et al. (2014) δ13C characteristics of soil organic carbon in hilly karst area. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 23: 2345-2349. [Google Scholar]
  17. Boutton TW (1991) Stable isotope ratios of natural materials: II. Atmospheric, terrestrial, marine, and freshwater environments. In: Coleman DC, Fry B. Carbon Isotope Techniques. New York: Academic Press.
  18. Farquhar GD, Ehleringer JR, Hubick KT (1989) Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annual Review Plant Biology 40: 503-537. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Krull ES, Skjemstad JO (2003) δ13C and δ15N profiles in 14C-dated Oxisol and Vertisols as a function of soil chemistry and mineralogy. Geoderma 112: 1-29. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Feng X (2002) A theoretical analysis of carbon isotope evolution of decomposing plant litters and soil organic matter. Global Biogeochemical Cycle 16: 1119. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Cai Y, Guo L, Wang X, Aiken G (2015) Abundance, stable isotopic composition, and export fluxes of DOC, POC, and DIC from the Lower Mississippi River during 2006-2008. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ramaswamy V, Gaye B, Shirodkar PV, Rao PS, Chivas AR, et al. (2008) Distribution and sources of organic carbon, nitrogen and their isotopic signatures in sediments from the Ayeyarwady (Irrawaddy) continental shelf, northern Andaman Sea. Marine Chemistry 111: 137-150. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhang J, Wu Y, Jennerjahn TC, Ittekkot V, He Q, et al. (2007) Distribution of organic matter in the Chang jiang (Yangtze River) Estuary and their stable carbon and nitrogen isotopic ratios: implications for source discrimination and sedimentary dynamics. Marine Chemistry 106: 111-126. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Yuan DX (1992) Karst in southwestern China and its comparison with karst in North China. Quaternary Research 4: 352-361. [Google Scholar]
  25. Can JH, Yuan DX, Tong LQ (2008) Characteristics of karst ecosystem in southwest China and comprehensive control of rocky desertification. Grassland Science 25: 40-50. [CrossRef]
  26. Huang J (2009) Yunnan stone forest karst mountain vegetation and soil degradation characteristics. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University.
  27. Liu J (2015) Research on Karst area forest vegetation climate characteristics. Kunming: Yunnan Normal University.
  28. Soil Survey Staff (2014) Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 12th ed.; USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service: Washington, DC, USA.
  29. Midwood AJ, Boutton TW (1998) Soil carbonate decomposition by acid has little effect on δ13C of organic matter. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 30: 1301-1307. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Meng L, DingW, Cai Z (2005) Long-term application of organic manure and nitrogen fertilizer on N2O emissions, soil quality and crop production in a sandy loam soil. Soil Biology Biochemistry 37: 2037-2045. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Tuo DA, Gao G, Chang R, Li Z, Ma Y, et al. (2018) Effects of revegetation and precipitation gradient on soil carbon and nitrogen variations in deep profiles on the Loess Plateau of China. Sci Total Environ 626: 399-411. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Chukwudi N, Okeke OJ, Fashae O, Nwankwoala H (2018) Soil organic carbon and total nitrogen stocks as affected by different land use in an Ultisol in Imo Watershed, southern Nigeria. Chemistry and Ecology. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Li C, Li Y, Tang L (2010) Soil organic carbon stock and carbon efflux in deep soils of desert and oasis. Environmental Earth Sciences 60: 549-557. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang Y, Li Y, Ye X, Chu Y, Wang X, et al. (2010) Profile storage of organic/inorganic carbon in soil: From forest to desert. Sci Total Environ 408: 1925-1931. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Zhang J, Wang X, Wang J, Wang WX (2014) Carbon and Nitrogen Contents in Typical Plants and Soil Profiles in Yanqi Basin of Northwest China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 13: 648-656. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Han GL, Tang Y, Liu M, Zwieten LV, Yang X, et al. (2020) Carbon-nitrogen isotope coupling of soil organic matter in a karst region under land use change, Southwest China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 301: 107027. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Xiong K, Yin C, Ji HB (2018) Soil erosion and chemical weathering in a region with typical karst topography. Environmental Earth Sciences 77: 500. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Njeru CM, Ekesi S, Mohamed SA, Kinyamario JI, Kiboi S, et al. (2017) Assessing stock and thresholds detection of soil organic carbon and nitrogen along an altitude gradient in an east Africa mountain ecosystem. Geoderma Regional 10: 29-38. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. De Neve S, Hofman G (2000) Influence of soil compaction on carbon and nitrogen mineralization of soil organic matter and crop residues. Biology and Fertility of Soils 30: 544-549. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Guillaume T, Damris M, Kuzyakov K (2015) Losses of soil carbon by converting tropical forest to plantations: erosion and decomposition estimated by δ13C. Global Change Biology 21: 3548-3560. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Chen QQ, Shen CD, Sun YM, Peng SL (2005) Mechanism of distribution of soil organic matter with depth due to evolution of soil profiles at the Dinghushan Natural Reserve. Acta Pedol Sin 42: 1-8.
  42. Chen QQ, Shen CD, Sun YM, Peng S, Yi W, et al. (2005) Spatial and temporal distribution of carbon isotopes in soil organic matter at the Dinghushan Biosphere Reserve, South China. Plant Soil 273: 115-128. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kalbitz K, Schwesig D, RethemeyerJ, Matzner E (2005) Stabilization of dissolves organic matter by sorption to the mineral soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 37: 1319-1331. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Kalbitz K, Schwesig D, Rethemeyer J, Matzner E (2000) Controls on the dynamic of dissolved organic matter in soils: a review. Soil Science 165: 277-304. [Google Scholar]
  45. Wynn JG, Harden JW, Fries TL (2006) Stable carbon isotope depth profiles and soil organic carbon dynamics in the lower Mississippi Basin. Geoderma 131: 89-109. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhu SF, Liu CQ (2006) Vertical patterns of stable carbon isotope in soils and particle-size fractions of karst areas, Southwest China. Environmental Geology 50: 1119-1127. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. Podwojewski P, Poulenard J, Nguyet ML, de Rouw A, Nguyen VT, et al. (2011) Climate and vegetation determine soil organic matter status in an alpine inner-tropical soil catena in the Fan Si Pan Mountain, Vietnam. Catena 87: 226-239. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Li XJ, Ogrinc N, Hamilton SK, Szramek K, Kanduc T, et al. (2009) Inorganic carbon isotope systematics in soil profiles undergoing silicate and carbonate weathering (Southern Michigan, USA). Chemical Geology 264: 139-153. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wang T, Kang F, Cheng X, Han H, Ji W, et al. (2016) Soil organic carbon and total nitrogen stocks under different land uses in a hilly ecological restoration area of north China. Soil and Tillage Research 163: 176-184. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. Don A, Schumacher J, Freibauer A (2011) Impact of tropical land-use change on soil organic carbon stocks - a meta-analysis. Global Change Biology 17: 1658-1670. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. Lal R (2001) Soil degradation by erosion. Land Degradation & Development 12: 519-539. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. Bai JH, DengW, Zhang YX (2001) Spatial distribution of nitrogen and phosphorus in soil of Momoge Wetland. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 15: 79-81. [Google Scholar]
  53. Diwediga B, Le QB, Agodzo S, Wala K (2017) Potential storages and drivers of soil organic carbon and total nitrogen across river basin landscape: the case of Mo River Basin (Togo) in West Africa. Ecological Engineering 99: 298-309. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. Gelaw AM, Singh BR, Lal R (2014) Soil organic carbon and total nitrogen stocks under different land uses in a semi-arid watershed in Tigray, northern Ethiopia. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 188: 256-263. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. Liu WG, Wang Z (2009) Nitrogen isotopic composition of plant-soil in the Loess Plateau and its responding to environmental change. Chinese Science Bulletin 54: 272-279. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. Jafari M, Kohande A, Baghbani S, Tavili A, Chahouki MAZ, et al. (2011) Comparison of chemical characteristics of shoot, root and litter in three range species of Salsola rigida, Artemisia sieberi and Stipa barbata. Caspian Journal Environment Science 9: 37-46. [Google Scholar]
  57. Conen F, Zimmermann M, Leifeld J, Seth B, Alewell C, et al. (2008) Relative stability of soil carbon revealed by shifts in δ15N and C: N ratio. Biogeosciences 5: 123-128. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. Nadelhoffer KJ, Fry B (1994) Nitrogen isotope studies in forest ecosystems. Stable isotopes in ecology and environmental science.
  59. Krull ES, Bestland EA, Skjemstad JO, Par JF (2006) Geochemistry (δ13C, δ15N, 13C NMR) and residence times (14C and OSL) of soil organic matter from red-brown earths of South Australia: Implications for soil genesis. Geoderma 132: 344-360. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. Goni MA, Teixeira MJ, Perkey DW (2003) Sources and distribution of organic matter in a river dominated estuary (Winyah Bay, SC, USA). Estuarine Coast Shelf Science 57: 1023-1048. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  61. Kendall C, Silva SR, Kelly VJ (2001) Carbon and nitrogen isotopic compositions of Particulate organic matter in four large river systems across the United States. Hydrological Processes 15: 1301-1346. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  62. Thorp JH, Delong MD, Greenwood KS, Casper AF (1998) Isotopic analysis of three food web theories in constricted and floodplain regions of a large river. Oecologia 117: 551-563. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  63. Landi A, Anderson DW, Mermut AR (2003) Organic carbon storage and stable isotope composition of soils along a grassland to forest environmental gradient in Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 83: 405-414. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  64. Kelly EF, Amundson RG, Marino BD, DeNiro MJ (1991) Stable carbon isotopic composition of carbonate in Holocene grassland soils. Soil Science Society of American Journal 55: 1651-1658. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  65. Nel JA, Craine JM, Cramer MD (2018) Correspondence between δ13C and δ15N in soils suggests coordinated fractionation processes for soil C and N. Plant Soil 423: 1-15. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  66. Xiao HY, Liu CQ (2002) Sources of nitrogen and sulfur in wet deposition at Guiyang, Southwest China. Atmos Environ 36: 5121-5130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  67. Stewart KJ, Grogan P, Coxson DS, Siciliano SD (2014) Topography as a key factor driving atmospheric nitrogen exchanges in arctic terrestrial ecosystems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 70: 96-112. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  68. Hobbie EA, Hogberg P (2012) Nitrogen isotopes link mycorrhizal fungi and plants to nitrogen dynamics. New Phytologist 196: 367-382. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  69. Mariotti A (1983) Atmospheric nitrogen is a reliable standard for natural 15N abundance measurements. Nature 303: 685-687. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  70. Meyers PA (1994) Preservation of elemental and isotopic source identification of sedimentary organic matter. Chemical Geology 114: 289-302. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  71. Parton WJ, Schimel DS, Cole CV, Ojima DS (1987) Analysis of factors controlling soil organic matter levels in Great Plains grasslands. Soil Science Society of American Journal 51: 1173-1179. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  72. Tiessen J, Stewart JW, Hunt HW (1984) Concepts of soil organic matter transformation in relation to organo-mineral particle size fractions. Plant Soil 76: 287-295. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  73. Powers JS, Schlesinger WH (2002) Geographic and vertical patterns of stable carbon isotopes in tropical rain forest soils of Costa Rica. Geoderma 109: 141-160. [Google Scholar]
  74. Garten CT, Cooper LW, Post WM, Hanson PJ (2000) Climate controls on forest soil C isotope ratios in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Ecology 81: 1108-1119. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  75. Ji-Suk P, Hee-Myong R (2018) Temporal Variations in Soil Profile Carbon and Nitrogen during Three Consecutive Years of 15N Deposition in Temperate Oak and Pine Forest Stands. Forests 9: 338. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  76. Powers JS, Schlesinger WH (2002) Relationships among soil carbon distributions and biophysical factors at nested spatial scales in rain forests of northeastern Costa Rica. Geoderma 109: 165-190. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  77. Awiti AO, Walsh MG, Kinyamario J (2008) Dynamics of topsoil carbon and nitrogen along a tropical forest cropland chronosequence: evidence from stable isotope analysis and spectroscopy. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 127: 265-272. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  78. Craine JM, Elmore AJ, Aidar MPM, Bustamante M, Dawson TE, et al (2010) Global patterns of foliar nitrogen isotopes and their relationships with climate, mycorrhizal fungi, foliar nutrient concentrations, and nitrogen availability. New Phytologist 183: 980-992. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  79. Nadelhoffer KJ, Fry B (1988) Controls on natural Nitrogen 15 and Carbon 13 abundances in forest soil organic matter. Soil Science Society of American Journal 52: 1633-1640. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  80. Mariotti A, Pierre D, Vedy JC (1980) The abundance of natural nitrogen 15 in the organic matter of soils along an altitudinal gradient. Catena 7: 293-300. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  81. Steele K, Wilson A, Saunders W (1981) Nitrogen isotope ratios in surface and subsurface horizons of New Zealand improved grassland soils. New Zealand Journnal of Agricultural Research 24: 167-170. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  82. Ledgard S, Freney J, Simpson J (1984) Variations in natural enrichment of 15N in the profiles of some Australian pasture soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research 22: 155-164. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  83. Ostrom N, Knoke KE, Hedin LO, Robertson GP, Smucker AJM, et al. (1998) Temporal trends in nitrogen isotope values of nitrate leaching from an agricultural soil. Chemical Geology 146: 219-227. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  84. Tokumoto I, Heilman JL, Schwinning S, et al (2014) Small-scale variability in water storage and plant available water in shallow, rocky soils. Plant Soil 385: 193-204. [Google Scholar]
  85. Acton P, Fox J, Campbell E, Rowe H, Wilkinson M, et al. (2013) Carbon isotope for estimating soil decomposition and physical mixing in well-drained forest soils. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 118: 1532-1545. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  86. McCorkle EP, Berhe AA, Carolyn T, Johnson DW, McFarlane KJ, et al. (2016) Tracing the source of soil organic matter eroded from temperate forest catchments using carbon and nitrogen isotopes. Chemical Geology 445: 172-184. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  87. Wang C, Lu X, Mori T, QingGong M, Kaijun Z, et al. (2018) Responses of soil microbial community to continuous experimental nitrogen additions for 13 years in a nitrogen-rich tropical forest. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 121: 103-112. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  88. Huon S, Grousset FE, Burdloff D, Bardoux G, Mariotti A, et al. (2002) Sources of fine-sized organic matter in North Atlantic Heinrich Layers: δ13C and δ15N tracers. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 66: 223-239. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  89. Meyers PA, Takemura K (1997) Quaternary changes in delivery and accumulation of organic matter to sediments of Lake Biwa, Japan. Journal of Paleolimnology 18: 211-218. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]