Profile
International Journal of Earth & Environmental Sciences Volume 6 (2021), Article ID 6:IJEES-183, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.15344/2456-351X/2021/183
Case Study
Comparison of Flight Height Controlled UAV and Ground Vector Magnetometer Survey Data Covering an Urban Landfill

Ed Cunion

Red Rocks Geophysical Consulting, Lakewood, CO 80228, USA
Ed Cunion, Red Rocks Geophysical Consulting, Lakewood, CO 80228, USA; E-mail: ed.cunion@gmail.com
11 June 2021; 26 June 2021; 28 June 2021
Cunion E (2021) Comparison of Flight Height Controlled UAV and Ground Vector Magnetometer Survey Data Covering an Urban Landfill. Int J Earth Environ Sci 6: 183. doi: https://doi.org/10.15344/2456-351X/2021/183

References

  1. Cunion E (2020) Comparison of flight height controlled UAV and ground vector magnetometer data covering an urban landfill. Society of Exploration Geophysicists (SEG).
  2. Cunion E (2021) Comparison of flight height controlled UAV and ground vector magnetometer data covering an urban landfill. Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems (SAGEEP). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cunion E (2021) Spherical calibration and quality control of ground and UAV vector magnetometer surveys. The Leading Edge 40: 382a1-382a6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bell R (2018) Above the dump, a SUAS enabled aeromagnetic survey of a landfill. Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems (SAGEEP).
  5. Sensys GmbH (2021) FGM3D75 magnetometer specification list.
  6. Dà-Jiāng Innovations DJI (2021) Enterprise products. [View]
  7. Gem Systems (2021) GSMP-35G magnetometer. [View]
  8. USGS (2020) 1-meter digital elevation models (DEMs) - USGS national map 3DEP downloadable data collection.
  9. Tolles WE, Lawson JD (1950) Magnetic compensation of MAD equipped aircraft. Mineola, NY Airborne Instruments Lab. Inc.
  10. Leliak P (1961) Identification and evaluation of magnetic field sources of magnetic airborne detector equipped aircraft. IRE Transactions on Aerospace and Navigational Electronics 3: 95-105. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wahba G (1965) A least squares estimate of satellite attitude. SIAM Review 3: 409. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lerner GM, Shuster MD (1979) Magnetometer bias determination and attitude determination for near-earth spacecraft. AIAA Guidance and Control Conference Paper No. AIAA 79-1695R. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Graven P, Kenny T (1996) Laboratory (and on-orbit) magnetometer calibration without coil facilities or orientation information. Tenth Annual AIAA/USU Small Satellite Conference. [Google Scholar]
  14. Auster HU, Fornacon KH, Georgescu E, Glassmeier KH, Motschumann U, et al. (2002) Calibration of fluxgate magnetometers using relative motion. Meas Sci Technol 13: 1124-1131. [Google Scholar]
  15. Connerney JEP, Benn M, Bjarno JB, Denver T, Espley J, et al. (2017) The Juno magnetic field investigation. Space Sci Rev 213: 39-138. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Munschy M, Boulanger D, Ulrich P, Bouiflane M (2007) Magnetic mapping for the detection and characterization of UXO: Use of multi-sensor fluxgate 3-axis magnetometers and methods of interpretation. Journal of Applied Geophysics 61: 168-183. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stoll JB (2013) Unmanned aircraft systems for rapid near surface geophysical measurements. International Archives of the Photogrammetry. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gavazzi B, Le Maire P, Munschy M, Dechamp A (2016) Fluxgate vector magnetometers: A multisensor device for ground, UAV, and airborne magnetic surveys. The Leading Edge 9: 795-797. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wikipedia (2020) Ellipsoid.
  20. Wikipedia (2021) Wahbas’s Problem.
  21. Coyle M, Dumont R, Keating P, Kiss F, Miles W, et al. (2014) Geological Survey of Canada aeromagnetic surveys: design, quality assurance, and data dissemination. GSC Open File 7660: 1-40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]