Profile
International Journal of Earth & Environmental Sciences Volume 4 (2019), Article ID 4:IJEES-160, 8 pages
https://doi.org/10.15344/2456-351X/2019/160
Review Article
What Height System Should be Used in Geomatics

Petr Vaníček and Marcelo Santos*

Department of geodesy and geomatics engineering, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada
Dr. Marcelo Santos, Department of geodesy and geomatics engineering, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada; E-mail: msantos@unb.ca
30 November 2018; 08 January 2019; 10 January 2019
Vaníček P, Santos M (2019) What Height System Should be Used in Geomatics. Int J Earth Environ Sci 4: 160. doi: https://doi.org/10.15344/2456-351X/2019/160

References

  1. Merry CL, Vaníček P (1981) The zero frequency response of sea level to meteorological influences. Department of Surveying Engineering Technical Report. University of New Brunswick, Fredericton.
  2. Vaníček P (1990) Vertical datum and the “NAD'88”. Paper presented at ACSM/ASPRS annual convention, Denver. Also printed in Surveying and Land Information Systems 51: 83-86.
  3. Wells D, Beck N, Delikaraoglou D, Kleusberg A, Krakiwsky EJ, et al. (1999) "Guide to GPS Positioning". Canadian GPS Associates. View
  4. Vaníček P, Krakiwsky EJ (1986) Geodesy: The Concepts. North-Holland, Amsterdam. Reprinted in China and in Iran.
  5. Vaníček P (1982) To the problem of holonomity of height systems. Letter to the editor, The Canadian Surveyor 36: 122-123.
  6. Sansò F, Vaníček P (2006) The orthometric height and the holonomity problem. Presented at the Grafarend symposium in Stuttgart. Journal of Geodesy 80: 225-232.
  7. Vaníček P (1998) The height of reason (a letter to the editor), GPS World.
  8. Vaníček P, Martinec Z (1993) Can the geoid be evaluated to a onecentimetre accuracy? A look at the theory. CGU Annual Meeting, Banff, Alberta.
  9. Foroughi I, Vaníček P, Kingdon R, Goli M, Sheng M, et al. (2018) Subcentimetre geoid. Journal of Geodesy 93: 849–868. View
  10. Tenzer R, Vaníček P, Santos M, Featherstone WE, Kuhn M, et al. (2005) The rigorous determination of orthometric heights. Journal of Geodesy 79: 1432-1394. View
  11. Santos M, Vaníček P, Featherstone WE, Kingdon R, Martin BA, et al. (2006) Relation between the rigorous and Helmert’s definitions of orthometric heights. Journal of Geodesy 80: 691-704. View
  12. Kingdon R, Vaníček P, Santos M, Ellmann, Tenzer R, (2005) Toward an improved height system for Canada. Geomatica 59: 241-249. View