Profile
International Journal of Earth & Environmental Sciences Volume 3 (2018), Article ID 3:IJEES-154, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.15344/2456-351X/2018/154
Original Article
On the Analogy Between the Electric Grid and Our Banking System: Investigating "Consumer Power" in Deregulated Power Markets

Per Ribbing

Department of Engineering Sciences, Division of Electricity, Uppsala University, Uppsala, SE-751 05, Sweden
Sir Per Ribbing, Department of Engineering Sciences, Division of Electricity, Uppsala University, Uppsala, SE-751 05, Sweden; E-mail: per.ribbing@angstrom.uu.se
09 July 2018; 02 August 2018; 13 August 2018
Ribbing P (2018) On the Analogy Between the Electric Grid and Our Banking System:Investigating "Consumer Power" in Deregulated Power Markets. Int J Earth Environ Sci 3: 154. doi: https://doi.org/10.15344/2456-351X/2018/154

References

  1. Arrhenius S (1896) On the Influence of Carbonic Acid in the Air upon the Temperature of the Ground. Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 41: 237-276. View
  2. Lönnberg J, Bladh J (2014) Flexibility and regulation capability of hydropower systems to balance large amounts of wind power: Influence of plant properties and hydrological conditions. View
  3. Olauson J, Ayob MN, Bergkvist M, Carpman N, Castellucci V, et al. (2016) Net load variability in Nordic countries with a highly or fully renewable power system. Nature Energy 1: 1-8. View
  4. http://www.energimyndigheten.se/globalassets/statistik/overgripanderapporter/ energilaget-2015_webb.pdf View
  5. Kristina E (2005) Public and private attitudes towards “green” electricity: the case of Swedish wind power. Energy Policy 33: 1677-1689. View
  6. Zoric J, Hrovatin N (2012) Household willingness to pay for green electricity in Slovenia. Energy policy 47: 180-187. View
  7. Wüstenhagen R, Markard J, Truffer B (2003) Diffusion of green power products in Switzerland. Energy Policy 31: 621-632. View
  8. Kaenzig J, Heinzle SL, Wüstenhagen R (2013) Whatever the customer wants, the customer gets? Exploring the gap between consumer preferences and default electricity products in Germany. Energy Policy 53: 311-322. View
  9. Morton DL (2002) Reviewing the history of electric power and electrification. Endeavour 26: 60-63. View
  10. Kåberger T (2003) Environmental labelling of electricity delivery contracts in Sweden. Energy Policy 31: 633-640. View
  11. http://nsninterconnector.com/ View
  12. The concise encyclopedia of economics. View
  13. Batista G, Anjos MF, Vanelli A (2006) Modeling Market Power in Electricity Markets: Is the Devil Only in the Details? The Electricity Journal 20: 82-92. View
  14. Boylestad RL (2015) Introductory Circuit Analysis, 13th Edition.
  15. Hansla A, Gamble A, Juliusson A, Gärling T (2008) Psychological determinants of attitude and willingness to pay for green electricity. Energy Policy 36: 768-774. View
  16. Hauch J (2003) Electricity trade and CO2 emission reductions in the Nordic countries. Energy Economics 25: 509-526. View
  17. Wüstenhagen R, Bilharz M (34) Green energy market development in Germany: effective public policy and emerging customer demand. Energy Policy 34: 1681-1696. View
  18. Kriterier BM (2009) Elenergi Version.
  19. Eriksson S, Bernhoff H, Leijon M (2008) Evaluation of different turbine concepts for wind power. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 12: 1419-1434. View
  20. Holttinen H, Tuhkanen S (2004) The effect of wind power on CO2 abatement in the Nordic Countries. Energy Policy 32: 1639-1652. View
  21. Sjödin J, Grönkvist S (2004) Emissions accounting for use and supply of electricity in the Nordic market. Energy Policy 32: 1555-1564. View
  22. Zoric J, Hrovatin N (2012) Household willingness to pay for green electricity in Slovenia. Energy policy 47 (2012) 180-187. View
  23. Wüstenhagen R, Markard J, Truffer B (2003) Diffusion of green power products in Switzerland. Energy Policy 31: 621-632. View