Profile
International Journal of Earth & Environmental Sciences Volume 2 (2017), Article ID 2:IJEES-147, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.15344/2456-351X/2017/147
Review Article
Investigation on Damage Mechanism of the Daikai Station Induced by the Strong Kobe Earthquake

Haitao Yu1,2* and Xinxi Li3

1Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
2Shanghai Municipal Engineering Design Institute (Group) Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200092, China
3Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Prof. Haitao Yu, Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai 200092, China; E-mail: yuhaitao@tongji.edu.cn
02 November 2017; 21 December 2017; 23 December 2017
Yu H, Li X (2017) Investigation on Damage Mechanism of the Daikai Station Induced by the Strong Kobe Earthquake. Int J Earth Environ Sci 2: 147. doi: https://doi.org/10.15344/2456-351X/2017/147

References

  1. Ji Q, Yang L (2001) Seismic Damage and Restoration Measures of Subway. Journal of Catastrophology 02: 32-37. View
  2. EQE Summary Report (1995) The January 17, 1995 Kobe Earthquake.
  3. Wang WL, Wang TT, Su JJ, Lin CH, Seng CR, et al. (2001) Assessment of damage in mountain tunnels due to the Taiwan Chi-Chi Earthquake. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology Incorporating Trenchless Technology Research 16: 133-150. View
  4. LIida H, Hiroto T, Yoshida N, Iwafuji M (1996) Damage to Daikai subway station. Soils and Foundations, Special Issue 36: 283-300. View
  5. JSEC, Report on the Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake, 1995, pp. 47-50.
  6. Zhuang HY, Cheng SG, Chen GX (2008) Numerical simulation and analysis of earthquake damages of Daikai metro station caused by Kobe earthquake. Rock and Soil Mechanics 01: 245-250. View
  7. Yamato T, Umehara T, Aoki H, Nakamura S, Ezaki J et al. (1996) Damage to Daikai subway station, Kobe rapid transit system and estimation of its reason. In Proceedings of Technical Conference on the Great Hanshin- Awaji Earthquake. JSCE, Tokyo 1996: 303-320 View
  8. Samata S, Ohuchi H, Matsuda T (1997) A study of the damage of subway structures during the 1995 Hanshin-Awaji earthquake. Cement and Concrete Composites 19: 223-239. View
  9. An XH, Shawky AA, Maekawa K (1997) The collapse mechanism of a subway station during the Great Hanshin Earthquake. Cement and Concrete Composites 19: 241-257. View
  10. Iwatate T, Kobayashi Y, Kusu H, Rin K (2000) Investigation and shaking table tests of subway structures of the Hyogoken-Nanbu earthquake. Proc. of the 12WCEE. View
  11. Parra-Montesinos GJ, Bobet A, Ramirez JA (2006) Evaluation of Soil- Structure Interaction and Structural Collapse in Daikai Subway Station During Kobe Earthquake. ACI Structural Journal 103: 113-122. View
  12. Huan Y, Liu J, Chen L (2009) 3D Seismic Response Study on Underground Structures Based on Damaged Plasticity Theory. International Conference of the Associated Research Centers for Urban Underground Space.
  13. Yang J (2000) Interpretation of Seismic Vertical Amplification Observed at an Array Site. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 90: 275-285. View
  14. Wang R Luo Q (1998) Analysis on the Damage to Underground Structure and Tunnel in Kobe Are Caused by Hanshin Earthquake. Journal of Catastrophology 02: 63-66.
  15. Kongai K, Kamiya H, Nishiyama S (2001) Deformation buildup in soils during the Kobe earthquake of 1995. Seismic Fault-induced Failures 01: 81-90.
  16. Chen GX, Zhuang HY, Zhang JL (2004) Analysis on the Earthquake Response of Subway Station Based on the Substructuring Subtraction Method. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Miligation Engineering 24: 396-401. View
  17. Liu J, Liu X (2008) Pushover analysis of Daikai subway station during the Osaka-Kobe earthquake in 1995. The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. View
  18. Sakai H, Nozu A (2002) Domiant frequency component of seismic wave for the damage of underground structure. The 11th Proceedings of Japan earthquake engineering 1033-1038.
  19. Huo H, Bobet A, Fernández G, Ramírez J (2005) Load Transfer Mechanisms between Underground Structure and Surrounding Ground: Evaluation of the Failure of the Daikai Station. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 131: 1522-1533. View
  20. Nakamura S (2010) Evaluation of Damage Mechanism of Subway Station Based on the Difference Damage Between Two Damaged Subway Stations Due to the Earthquake. Proceedings of JSCE 654: 335-354.
  21. Uenishi K, Sakurai S (2000) Characteristic of the vertical seismic waves associated with the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu (Kobe), Japan earthquake estimated from the failure of the Daikai Underground Station. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 29: 813-821. View
  22. Hsieh SS, Ting EC, Chen WF (1982) A plasticity fracture model for concrete. International Journal of Solids and Structures 18: 181-197. View
  23. Han DJ, Chen WF (1987) Constitutive modeling in analysis of concrete structures. Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division ASCE 113: 577-593. View
  24. ABAQUS Inc (2010) Analysis User's Manual. Volume III: Materials.
  25. Lubliner J, Oliver J, Oller S, Oñate E (1989) A plastic-damage model for concrete. International Journal of Solids and Structures 25: 299-326. View
  26. Lee J, Fenves GL (1998) Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 124: 892-900. View
  27. Seed HB, Idriss IM (1970) Soil Moduli and Damping Factors for Dynamic Response Analysis. Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, Report No. EERC 70-10.
  28. Yoshida N, Iai S (1998) Nonlinear Site Response and Its Evaluation and Prediction. Proceeding of the 2nd International Symposium on the Effect of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion, Yokosuka, Japan 71-90. View
  29. ABAQUS Inc (2007) Explicit dynamic analysis. section 6.3.3 of ABAQUS Analysis User's Manual.
  30. Hashash YMA, Hook JJ, Schmidt B, Yao JIC (2001) Seismic design and analysis of underground structures. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 16: 247-293. View