International Journal of Earth & Environmental Sciences Volume 1 (2016), Article ID 1:IJEES-111, 11 pages
Research Article
The Evolutionary Concepts and Practical Utilization of the T thian Theory of Regional Groundwater Flow

József Tóth

Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Dr. József Tóth, Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, Tel: (780) 492-2178; E-mail:
22 March 2016; 02 July 2016; 04 July 2016
Tóth J (2016) The Evolutionary Concepts and Practical Utilization of the Tóthian Theory of Regional Groundwater Flow. Int J Earth Environ Sci 1: 111. doi:


  1. Tóth J (1962a) A theory of groundwater motion in small drainage basins in central Alberta, Canada. Journal of Geophysical Research 67: 4375-4387.
  2. Tóth J (1963) A theoretical analysis of groundwater flow in small drainage basins. Journal of Geophysical Research 68: 4795-4812. Reprinted In Physical Hydrogeology; Benchmark Papers in Geology, ed R. A. Freeze and W. Back (1983) Hutchinson Ross Publ. Co. Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, U.S.A. p. 328-345.
  3. Tóth J (1978) Gravity-induced cross-formational flow of formation fluids, Red Earth Region, Alberta, Canada: analysis, patterns and evolution. Water Resources Research 14: 805-843.
  4. Tóth J (1979) Patterns of dynamic pressure-increment of formation fluid flow in large drainage basins, exemplified by the Red Earth region, Alberta, Canada. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology 27: 63-86.
  5. Pollo MV (1st c. BC) Reference to specific work is unavailable.
  6. da Vinci L (13th-14th c. AD) Reference to specific work is unavailable.
  7. Vallisnieri A (15th-16th c. AD) Reference to work is unavailable.
  8. King FH (1892) Observations and experiments on the fluctuations in the level and rate of movement of ground-water on the Wisconsin Agricultural Experiment Station farm and at Whitewater, Wisconsin: U.S. Weather Bureau Bulletin 5, 75 p.
  9. King FH (1899) Principles and conditions of the movement of ground water: U.S. Geological Survey 19th Annual Report, part 2, p. 59-294, accessed May 17, 2008.
  10. Slichter ChS (1902) The motions of underground waters. U.s.Geological Survey Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper, 67. Washington, DC: US Geological Survey.
  11. D’Andrimont R (1906) La Science Hydrologique (The Science of Hydrology) Revue Universelle de Mines. Liège, Bérange.
  12. Fourmarier P (1939) Hydrogéologie. Introduction à l’étude des eaux destinées à l’alimentation humaine et à l’industrie (Hydrogeology. Introduction to the study of water used for human consumption and by industry) Masson et Cie, Paris.
  13. Darcy H (1856) Les Fontaines Publiques de La Ville De Dijon. (The public fountains of the City of Dijon) Victor Dalmont, Paris.
  14. Dupuit J (1863) Études Théoriques et Pratiques sur le Mouvement des Eaux dans les Canaux Découverts et à Travers les Terrains Perméables (Theoretical and Practical Studies of Water Mouvement in Open Channels Permeable Rocks) Dunod, Paris, France.
  15. Thiem G (1906) Hydrogeologische Methoden (Hydrogeological Methods) Gebhart, Leipzig.
  16. Theis CV (1935) The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using groundwater storage. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 2: 519-524.
  17. Walton WC (1960) Leaky Artesian Aquifer Conditions in Illinois. Illinois State Water Survey, Report of Investigations 39. Urbana, Illinois, U.S.A.
  18. Hantush MS, Jacob CE (1954) Plane potential flow of ground water with linear leakage. Transactions, American Geophysical Union 35: 917-936.
  19. Hantush MS, Jacob CE (1955) Nonsteady radial flow in an infinite leaky aquifer. Transactions, American Geophysical Union 36: 95-100.
  20. Witherspoon PA, Neuman SP (1967) Evaluating a slightly permeable caprock in aquifer gas storage: I. Caprock of infinite thickness. Journal of Petroleum Technology, pp. 949-955.
  21. Neuman SP, Witherspoon PA (1971) Transient flow of groundwater to wells in multiple-aquifer systems. In Aquitards in the Coastal Groundwater Basin of Oxnard Plain, Ventura County. Bulletin No. 63-4, Appendix A. Department of Water Resources, California, U.S.A. pp. 159-359.
  22. Geraghty JJ (1960) Movement of contaminants through geologic formations. 1990 Activities, National Water Well Association, Technical Division, Urbana, Illinois, U.S.A. pp. 33-43.
  23. Kolesov GD (1965) On the question of artesian feeding of rivers. Soviet Hydrology 3: 195-203.
  24. Albinet M, Cottez S (1969) Utilisation et interprétation des cartes de différences de pression entre nappes superposées (Utilization and interpretation of maps of pressure-difference between superjacent aquifers) Chronique d’Hydrogéologie de BRGM, Paris, 12: 43-48.
  25. Meyboom P, van Everdingen RO, Freeze RA (1966) Patterns of Groundwater Flow in Seven Discharge Areas in Saskatchewan and Manitoba. Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin 147, Ottawa, Canada.
  26. Tóth J (1966a) Mapping and interpretation of field phenomena for groundwater reconnaissance in a prairie environment, Alberta, Canada. International Association of Scientific Hydrology Bulletin 16: 20-68.
  27. Mifflin D (1968) Delineation of Ground-Water Flow Systems in Nevada. Publication No. 4. Technical Report Series H-W, Center for Water Resources Research, Desert Research Institute, University of Nevada System, Reno, U.S.A.
  28. Hitchon B (1969) Fluid flow in western Canada sedimentary basin 1. Effect of topography. Water Resources Research 5: 186-195.
  29. Erdélyi M (1976) Outlines of the hydrodynamics and hydrochemistry of the Pannonian Basin. Acta Geologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 20: 287-309.
  30. Hubbert MK (1940) The theory of ground-water motion. The Journal of Geology 48: 785-944.
  31. Freeze RA, Witherspoon PA (1966) Theoretical analysis of regional groundwater flow: 1. Analytical and numerical solutions to the mathematical model. Water Resources Research 2: 641-656.
  32. Tóth J (2009) Gravitational systems of groundwater flow: Theory, Evaluation, Utilization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 297 p.
  33. Freeze RA, Witherspoon PA (1967) Theoretical analysis of regional groundwater flow. 2. Effect of water table configuration and subsurface permeability variation. Water Resources Research 3: 623-634.
  34. Freeze RA, Witherspoon, PA (1968) Theoretical analysis of the regional ground water flow. 3. Qantitative interpretations. Water Resources Research 4: 581-590.
  35. Tóth J (1995) Hydraulic continuity in large sedimentary basins. Hydrogeology Journal 3: 4-16.
  36. Tóth J, Millar RF (1983) Possible effects of erosional changes of the topographic relief on pore pressures at depth. Water Resources Research 19: 1585-1597.
  37. Gleeson T, Manning AH (2008) Regional groundwater flow in mountainous terrain: Three-dimensional simulations of topographic and hydrogeologic controls. Water Resources Research 44: W10403.
  38. Robinson NI, Love AJ (2013) Hidden channels of groundwater flow in Tóthian drainage basins. Advances in Water Resources 62: 71-78.
  39. Tóth J (1962b) A theoretical analysis of groundwater flow in small drainage basins. In Proceedings of Hydrology Symposium 3, Groundwater; October, 1962, Calgary. National Research Council of Canada, Associate Committee on Geodesy and Geophysics, Subcommittee on Hydrology. Ottawa, Canada. p. 75-106.
  40. Engelen GB, Jones GP ed (1986) Developments in the analysis of groundwater flow systems. IAHS publication 163, International Association of Hydrological Sciences. Wallingford, England.
  41. Kiraly L (1970) L’influence de l’hétérogénéité et de l’anisotropie de la perméabilité sur les systèmes d’écoulement (The influence of heterogeneity and anisotropy on [groundwater] flow systems) Bull. Ver Schweiz Petrol Geol Ing 37: 50-57.
  42. Tóth J, Rakhit K (1988) Exploration for reservoir quality rock bodies by mapping and simulation of potentiometric surface anomalies. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology 36: 362-378.
  43. Tóth J (1990) Hydraulic Continuity in Large Sedimentary Basins; Keynote Address, Proceedings of International Conference on Groundwater in Large Sedimentary Basins, Perth, Australia, July 8-10, 1990.
  44. Tóth J (1984) The role of regional gravity flow in the chemical and thermal evolution of ground water In Proceedings, Practical Applications of Ground Water Geochemistry, ed. B. Hitchon and E. I. Wallick. First Canadian/ American Conference on Hydrogeology, National Water Well Association and Alberta Research Council. Worthington, Ohio, U.S.A. pp. 3-39.
  45. Tóth J (1988) Ground water and hydrocarbon migration. In Hydrogeology. Geology of North America, v. O-2, ed. W. Back, J. S. Rosenshein and P. R. Seaber. Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colorado, pp. 485-502.
  46. Haitjema HM, Mitchell-Bruker S (2005) Are water tables a subdued replica of the topography? Ground Water 43:781-786.
  47. Jiang XW, Wan L, Wang XS, Ge S, Liu J (2009) Effect of exponential decay in hydraulic conductivity with depth on regional groundwater flow. Geophysical Research Letters 36: L24402.
  48. Jiang XW, Wang XS, Wan L, Ge S (2011) An analytical study on stagnation points in nested flow systems in basins with depth-decaying hydraulic conductivity. Water Resources Research 47: W01512.
  49. Athy LF (1930) Density, porosity, and compaction of sedimentary rocks. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 14: 1-22.
  50. Jiang XW, Wan L, Cardenas MB, Ge S, Wang XS (2010) Simultaneous rejuvenation and aging of groundwater in basins due to depth-decaying conductivity and porosity. Geophysical Research Letters, 37: L05403,
  51. Cardenas BM, Jiang XW (2010) Groundwater flow, transport, and residence times through topography-driven basins with exponentially decreasing permeability and porosity. Water Resources Research 46: W11538.
  52. Zlotnik VA, Cardenas MB, Toundykov D (2010) Effects of multiscale anisotropy on basin and hyporheic groundwater flow. Ground Water 49: 576-583.
  53. Wang XS, Jiang SW, Wan L, Ge S, Li H (2011) A new analytical solution of topography-driven flow in a drainage basin with depth-dependent anisotropy of permeability. Water Resources Research 47: W09603.
  54. Tóth J (1999) Groundwater as a geologic agent: An overview of the causes, processes, and manifestations. Hydrogeology Journal, 7(1):1-14.
  55. Tóth J (2000) Las aguas subterráneas como agente geológico: causas, procesos y manifestaciones. Boletín Geologico y Minero, 111: 9-26
  56. Freeze RA (1969) Regional groundwater flow - Old Wives Lake Drainage Basin, Saskatchewan. Scientific Series No. 5. Inland Waters Branch, Dept of Energy, Mines and Resources, Ottawa, Canada.
  57. Williams RE (1968) Groundwater flow systems and related highway pavement failure in cold mountain valleys. Journal of Hydrology 6: 183-193.
  58. Williams RE (1970) Groundwater flow systems and accumulation of evaporate minerals. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 54: 1290-1295.
  59. Domenico PA, Palciauskas VV (1973) Theoretical analysis of forced convective heat transfer in regional groundwater flow. Geological Society of America Bulletin 84: 3803-3814.
  60. Schwartz FW, Domenico PA (1973) Simulation of hydrochemical patterns in regional groundwater flow. Water Resources Research 9: 707-720.
  61. Tóth J (1980) Cross-formational gravity-flow of groundwater: A mechanism of the transport and accumulation of petroleum (the generalized hydraulic theory of petroleum migration) In Problems of Petroleum Migration, ed. W. H. Roberts III and R. J. Cordell. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Studies in Geology 10: 121-167.
  62. Fritz P (1968) Osservacioni idrologiche sulle acque di Montecatini Terme (Hydrological observations on the thermal springs of Montecatini Terme). Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata 10: 15-27.
  63. Winter TC, Bidwell LE, Maclay RW (1970) Water Resources of the Wild Rice River Watershed, Northwestern Minnesota. Hydrologic Investigations, Atlas HA-339. U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
  64. Engelen G B, Kloosterman FH (1996) Hydrological systems analysis: methods and applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht Boston London.
  65. Macumber PG (1991) Interaction between Ground Water and Surface Systems in Northern Victoria. Department of Conservation and Environment, Victoria, Australia.
  66. Walker G, Gilfedder M, Evans R, Dyson Ph, Stauffacher M (2003) Groundwater Flow System Framework: Essential tools for planning salinity management. Murray-Darling Basin Commission, MDBC Publication 15/03. Canberra, Australia.
  67. Winter TC, Harvey JW, Fanke OL, Alley WM (1998) Ground Water and Surface Water − A Single Resouce. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1139. Denver, Colorado, U.S.A.
  68. Tóth J (1966b) Groundwater Geology, Movement, Chemistry and Resources near Olds, Alberta. Bulletin 17, Research Council of Alberta. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Also: Alberta Geological Survey “Bulletin Series”, BUL-17) Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  69. Ortega GA, Farvolden RN (1989) Computer analysis of regional groundwater flow and boundary conditions in the basin of Mexico. Journal of Hydrology 110: 271-294.
  70. Delinom RM (2009) Structural geology controls on groundwater flow: Lembang Fault case study, West Java, Indonesia. Hydrogeology Journal 17: 1011-1023.
  71. Gleeson T, Befus KM, Jasechko S, Luijendijk E, Cardenas MB (2016) The global volume and distribution of modern groundwater. Nature Geoscience 9: 161-167.
  72. Galloway WE (1978) Uranium mineralization in a coastal-plain fluvial aquifer system: Catahoula Formation, Texas. Economic Geology 73: 1655- 1676.
  73. Garven G, Freeze RA (1984) Theoretical analysis of the role of groundwater flow in the genesis of stratabound ore deposits. 1. Mathematical and numerical model; 2.Quantitative results. American Journal of Science 284: 1085-1124.
  74. Sanford RF (1994) A quantitative model of ground-water flow during formation of tabular sandstone uranium deposits. Economic Geology 89: 341-360.
  75. Sanford R F (1995) Ground-water flow and migration of hydrocarbons to the Lower Permian White Rim sandstone, Tar Sand Triangle, Southeastern Utah. US Geological Survey Bulletin, 2000-J, Washington, DC.
  76. Verweij JM (1993) Hydrocarbon Migration System Analysis. Developments in Petroleum Science, 35. Elsevier.
  77. Verweij JM (2003) Fluid Flow Systems Analysis on Geological Timescales in Onshore and Offshore Netherlands – With Special Reference to the Broad Fourteens Basin. Netherlands Institute of Applied Geoscience TNONational Geological Survey, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  78. Srisuk K, Archwichai L, Pholkern K, Saraphirom P (2015) Land use Changes due to Groundwater Exploitations at Ban Nong Khai Nun, Thaphra District, Khon Kaen, Northeast Thailand. GW-5, 5th GEOINDO 2015: 23-24.
  79. Iverson RM, Reid ME (1992) Gravity-driven groundwater flow and slope failure potential−1. Elastic effective-stress model. Water Resources Research 28: 925-938.
  80. Reid ME and Iverson RM (1992) Gravity-driven groundwater flow and slope failure potential−2. Effects of slope morphology, material properties, and hydraulic heterogeneity. Water Resources Research 28: 939-950.
  81. Bodmer Ph, Rybach L (1984a) Geothermal Map of Switzerland: Heat Flow Density. - Swiss Geophysical Comission, Zürich, Switzerland.
  82. Bodmer Ph, Rybach L (1984b) Heat flow maps and deep ground water circulation: Examples from Switzerland. - Journal of Geodynamics 4: 233- 245.
  83. Lazear GD (2006) Evidence for deep groundwater flow and convective heat transport in mountainous terrain, Delta County, Colorado. U.S.A.. Hydrogeology Journal 14: 1582-1598.
  84. Kooi H (2016) Groundwater flow as a cooling agent of the continental lithosphere. Nature Geoscience 9: 227-230.
  85. Klimchouk A (2007) Hypogene speleogenesis: Hydrogeological and morphogenetic perspective. National Cave and Karst Research Institute. Carlsbad, NM, U.S.A. Special Paper No. 1. 106 p.
  86. Goldscheider N, Mádl-Szőnyi J, Erőss A, Schill E (2010) Review: thermal water resources in carbonate rock aquifers. Hydrogeology Journal 18: 1303-1318.
  87. Mádl-Szőnyi J, Tóth Á (2015) Basin-scale conceptual groundwater flow model for an unconfined and confined thick carbonate region. Hydrogeology Journal 23: 1359-1380.
  88. Tóth J, Sheng G (1996) Enhancing safety of nuclear waste disposal by exploiting regional groundwater flow: The Recharge Area Concept. Hydrogeology Journal 4: 4-25.
  89. Voss C I, Provost AM (2001) Recharge-Area Nuclear Waste Repository in Southeastern Sweden − Demonstration of Hydrogeologic Siting Concepts and Techniques. Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate (SKI) Report 01:44. US Geological Survey, Reston, VA., U.S.A.
  90. Hancock PJ, Boulton AJ, Humphreys WF (2005) Aquifers and hyporheic zones: Towards an ecological understanding of groundwater. Hydrogeology Journal 13: 98-111.
  91. Bobba AG, Bukata RP, Jerome JH (1992) Digitally processed satellite data as a tool in detecting potential groundwater flow systems. Journal of Hydrology 131: 25-62.
  92. Hoffmann J (2005) The future of satellite remote sensing in hydrogeology. Hydrogeology Journal 13:247-250.
  93. Tweed SO, Leblanc M, Webb JA, Lubczynski MW (2007) Remote sensing and GIS for mapping groundwater recharge and discharge areas in salinity prone catchments, southeastern Australia. Hydrogeogy Journal 15: 75-69.