Profile

New User

New to Graphy Publications? Create an account to get started today.

Registered Users

Have an account? Sign in now.

How to Cite | Author Information | Publication History
International Journal of Earth & Environmental Sciences Volume 1 (2016), Article ID 1:IJEES-106, 3 pages
https://doi.org/10.15344/2456-351X/2016/106
Commentary
Relevant Quality of Digital Elevation Models in Earth and Environmental Studies?

Tomaž Podobnikar

Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Kongresni trg 12, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Dr. Tomaž Podobnikar, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Kongresni trg 12, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; E-mail: tomaz.podobnikar@fgg.uni-lj.si
27 January 2016; 17 April 2016; 19 April 2016
Podobnikar T (2016) Relevant Quality of Digital Elevation Models in Earth and Environmental Studies? Int J Earth Environ Sci 1: 106. doi: https://doi.org/10.15344/2456-351X/2016/106
© 2016 Podobnikar. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

References

  1. Fisher PF, Tate NJ (2006) Causes and consequences of error in digital elevation models. Prog Phys Geog 30: 467-489. View
  2. Evans IS (2012) Geomorphometry and landform mapping: What is a landform? Geomorphol 137: 94-106. View
  3. HöhleJ, Potuckova M (2011) Assessment of the Quality of Digital Terrain Models. Euro SDR. View
  4. Podobnikar T (2005) Production of integrated digital terrain model from multiple datasets of different quality. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 19: 69-89. View
  5. Price DJ de S (1963) Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press. View
  6. Liu XH, Hu P, Hu H, Sherba J (2012) Approximation Theory Applied to DEM Vertical Accuracy Assessment. Trans GIS 16: 397-410. View
  7. Carrara A, Bitelli G, Carla R (1998) Comparison of techniques for generating digital terrain models from contour lines. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 11: 451-473. View
  8. GUM (2008) Evaluation of measurement data- Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. JCGM. View
  9. Podobnikar T (2009) Methods for visual quality assessment of a digital terrain model. S.A.P.I.EN.S. 2: 15-24. View
  10. Saylam K (2009) Quality assurance of lidar systems – mission planning. ASPRS Annual Conference. View
  11. Östman A (1987) Accuracy estimation of digital elevation data banks. Photo gramm Eng Remote Sens. 53: 425-430.
  12. Oksanen J, Sarjakoski T (2006) Uncovering the statistical and spatial characteristics of fine toposcale DEM error. Int J GeogrInfSci 20: 345-369. View
  13. Aguilar FJ, Agüera F, Aguilar MA, Carvajal F (2005) Effects of Terrain Morphology, Sampling Density, and Interpolation Methods on Grid DEM Accuracy. Photo gramm Eng Remote Sens 71: 805-816. View
  14. Carlisle BH (2005) Modelling the Spatial Distribution of DEM Error. Trans GIS 9: 521-540. View
  15. Lovatt E (2013) Global flight-path maps: Five interpretations. BBC News. View
Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, Safari, Above IE 9.0 version
Privacy Policy | Copyright & Permissions
Copyright © 2013-2024 Graphy Publications, All Rights Reserved.