Profile
International Journal of Digital Health Volume 1 (2021), Article ID 1:IJDH-108, 8 pages
https://doi.org/10.15344/ijdh/2021/108
Research Article
Implementation Fidelity of an Online Integrated Healthy Lifestyle Service during COVID-19: A Process Evaluation

George J. Sanders*, Carlton Cooke and Paul Gately

Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Fairfax Hall Rm 230, Headingley Campus, Leeds LS6 3QS, United Kingdom
Dr. George J. Sanders, Leeds Beckett University, Fairfax Hall Rm 230, Headingley Campus, Leeds LS6 3QS, United Kingdom; Tel: 0113 812 6965; E-mail: g.sanders@leedsbeckett.ac.uk
20 October 2021; 29 December 2021; 31 December 2021
Sanders GJ, Cooke C, Gately P (2021) Implementation Fidelity of an Online Integrated Healthy Lifestyle Service during COVID-19: A Process Evaluation. Int J Digt Hlthc 1: 108. doi: https://doi.org/10.15344/ijdh/2021/108

References

  1. World Health Organisation (2020) Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report - 101.
  2. Milne-Ives M, Lam C, De Cock C, Van Velthoven MH, Meinert E, et al. (2020) Mobile apps for health behavior change in physical activity, diet, drug and alcohol use, and mental health: Systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 8: e17046. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Rhodes A, Smith AD, Chadwick P, Croker H, Llewellyn CH, et al. (2020) Exclusively Digital Health Interventions Targeting Diet, Physical Activity, and Weight Gain in Pregnant Women: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 8: e18255. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Bucci S, Schwannauer M, Berry N (2019) The digital revolution and its impact on mental health care. Psychol Psychother 92: 277-297. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Nensi A, Robertson D, Simpson A, Kives S, Lei R, et al. (2020) Utilizing LEAN methodology to optimize operating room efficiency: A multidisciplinary process-mapping exercise. Am J Med Qual 42: 684. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Means AR, Wagner AD, Kern E, Newman LP, Weiner BJ, et al. (2020) Implementation science to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Public Health 8: 462-471. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, et al. (2011) Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health 38: 65-76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Demiris G, Parker Oliver D, Capurro D, Wittenberg-Lyles E (2014) Implementation science: implications for intervention research in hospice and palliative care. Gerontologist 54: 163-171. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Koorts H, Eakin E, Estabrooks P, Timperio A, Salmon J, et al. (2018) Implementation and scale up of population physical activity interventions for clinical and community settings: the PRACTIS guide. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 15: 51-61. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Hasson H (2010) Systematic evaluation of implementation fidelity of complex interventions in health and social care. Implement Sci 5: 67-75. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Glasgow RE, Green LW, Taylor MV, Stange KC (2012) An evidence integration triangle for aligning science with policy and practice. Am J Prev Med 42: 646-654. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Kremers SP (2010) Theory and practice in the study of influences on energy balance-related behaviors. Patient Educ Couns 79: 291-298. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2013) Physical activity: brief advice for adults in primary care.
  14. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2014) Weight management: lifestyle services for overweight or obese adults (PH53).
  15. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2018) Stop smoking interventions and services (NG92).
  16. Public Health England (2018) Research and analysis. Chapter 5: inequalities in health.
  17. Sallis A, Porter L, Tan K, Howard R, Brown L, et al. (2019) Improving child weight management uptake through enhanced National Child Measurement Programme parental feedback letters: A randomised controlled trial. Prev Med 121: 128-135. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. French DP, Olander EK, Chisholm A, Mc Sharry J (2014) Which behaviour change techniques are most effective at increasing older adults’ self-efficacy and physical activity behaviour? A systematic review. Ann Behav Med 48: 225-234. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Zahle J (2020) Objective data sets in qualitative research. Synthese: 1-17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Bussu S, Marshall M (2020) Organisational development to support integrated care in East London: the perspective of clinicians and social workers on the ground. J Health Organ Manag 35: 603-619. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Pinder C, Vermeulen J, Cowan BR, Beale R (2018) Digital behaviour change interventions to break and form habits. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 25: 1-66. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hoeft TJ, Wilcox H, Hinton L, Unützer J (2019) Costs of implementing and sustaining enhanced collaborative care programs involving community partners. Implementation Science 14: 1-11. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Castro PPC (2019) The viable system model as a framework to guide organisational adaptive response in times of instability and change. International Journal of Organizational Analysis 27: 289-307. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Röth T, Spieth P (2019) The influence of resistance to change on evaluating an innovation project's innovativeness and risk: A sensemaking perspective. Journal of Business Research 101: 83-92. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Valentijn PP, Vrijhoef HJ, Ruwaard D, de Bont A, Arends RY, et al. (2015) Exploring the success of an integrated primary care partnership: a longitudinal study of collaboration processes. BMC Health Serv Res 15: 32-39. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Erlingsdottir G, Ersson A, Borell J, Rydenfält C (2018) Driving for successful change processes in healthcare by putting staff at the wheel. J Health Organ Manag 32: 69-84. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Lattie EG, Nicholas J, Knapp AA, Skerl JJ, Kaiser SM, et al. (2020) Opportunities for and tensions surrounding the use of technology-enabled mental health services in community mental health care. Adm Policy Ment Health 47: 138-149. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Torous J, Myrick KJ, Rauseo-Ricupero N, Firth J (2020) Digital mental health and COVID-19: Using technology today to accelerate the curve on access and quality tomorrow. JMIR Ment Health 7: e18848. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Di Lorito C, Bosco A, Goldberg SE, Nair R, et al. (2020) Protocol for the process evaluation of the Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia (PrAISED), following changes required by the COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ open 10: e039305. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Bosco A, Paulauskaite L, Hall I, Crabtree J, Soni S, et al. (2019) Process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial of PBS-based staff training for challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disability. PLoS One 14: e0221507. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  31. Wind TR, Rijkeboer M, Andersson G, Riper H (2020) The COVID-19 pandemic: The ‘black swan’ for mental health care and a turning point for e-health. Internet Interv 20: e100317. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Hodge H, Carson D, Carson D, Newman L, Garretta J, et al. (2017) Using Internet technologies in rural communities to access services: The views of older people and service providers. Journal of Rural Studies 54: 469-478. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Beaunoyer E, Dupéré S, Guitton MJ (2020) COVID-19 and digital inequalities: Reciprocal impacts and mitigation strategies. Computers in Human Behavior 111: 106424. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hoffman L, Wisniewski H, Hays R, Henson P, Vaidyam A, et al. (2020) Digital Opportunities for Outcomes in Recovery Services (DOORS): a pragmatic hands-on group approach toward increasing digital health and smartphone competencies, autonomy, relatedness, and alliance for those with serious mental illness. J Psychiatr Pract 26: 80-88. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Michie S, Yardley L, West R, Patrick K, Greaves F, et al. (2017) Developing and evaluating digital interventions to promote behavior change in health and health care: recommendations resulting from an international workshop. J Med Internet Res 19: e232. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA, et al. (2014) Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med 89: 1245-1251. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]