Profile
International Journal of Clinical Research & Trials Volume 2 (2017), Article ID 2:IJCRT, 2 pages
https://doi.org/10.15344/2456-8007/2017/114
Letters to the Editor
Shifting Profile of MDR-TB Patients in Northern Portugal?

Olena Oliveira1*, A. Rita Gaio2,3, Anabela Silva4,5, Rita Macedo4 and Raquel Duarte1,4,6,7

1EPIUnit, Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Portugal
2Mathematics Department, Faculty of Sciences of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
3Centre of Mathematics of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
4Reference Centre for Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in the North Region of Portugal, Chest Disease Centre of Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
5National Health Institute Doutor Ricardo Jorge, Portugal
6Pulmonology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, EPE, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
7Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Predictive Medicine and Public Health, Universityof Porto, Porto, Portugal
Dr. Olena Oliveira, EPIUnit, Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Portugal; E-mail: abernardo@egasmoniz.edu.pt
05 April 2017; 28 June 2017; 30 June 2017
Oliveira O, Gaio AR, Silva A, Macedo R, Duarte R (2017) Shifting Profile of MDR-TB Patients in Northern Portugal?. Int J Clin Res Trials 2: 114. doi: https://doi.org/10.15344/2456-8007/2017/114

The occurrence of multidrug and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (M/XDR-TB), defined as a public health crisis by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2013 [1], is a threat to all efforts to control TB in Europe. Despite the steady decline of TB incidence, Europe has faced the largest proportion of M/XDR-TB among individuals diagnosed with TB; this requires a stronger link between health system strengthening and M/XDR-TB control to adequately prevent and treat this deadly disease [2]. In 2014, 15% of new TB cases and 48% of previously treated cases were estimated to be MDR-TB [3].The XDR-TB prevalence among MDR-TB patients was 17.5 % [4]. Within Europe the epidemiological pattern of TB varies greatly, with some countries showing a steady progress towards elimination of the disease, while others continue to face high rates of incidence [5].

Portugal is the only Western European country presenting an intermediate TB incidence, estimated at 20 per 100 000 inhabitants in 2014, with the infection being concentrated at the two largest cities of Porto (Northern Region) and Lisbon (Lisbon and Tagus Valley Region) [6]. Nation wide, MDR-TB was reported for 2.5 % of the cases with drug-susceptibility testing (DST) results, 26% of which XDR. MDR-TB was substantially circumscribed to the metropolitan areas of Porto and Lisbon [5]. In the Northern Region of Portugal, MDRTB was reported for 1.3 % of the cases with DST results without any diagnosed cases of XDR-TB [7].

In 2007, the National TB Program defined specific strategies to control MDR-TB, based on the WHO Global Plan to Stop TB (2006- 2015) [8]. The National Reference Centre for M/XDR-TB was created in June 2007 [9]. Facing the need to decentralize the approach of M/ XDR TB cases at a regional level, the Health National Directorate proposed the creation of 7 Regional Reference Centres for MDR-TB (CRRMR), one for each of the 7 Health Regions of the country.

The Northern Regional Reference Centre (NRRC) was the first unit starting its activity, in July 2009 [10].The NRRC is responsible for the clinical management of MDR-TB patients, including the choice and adjustment of treatment regimen according to the adverse effects, and the determination of need for hospitalization. Together with the family physician and public health authorities, the NRRC identifies the best strategy for contact tracing. Directly observed therapy is provided through the whole treatment.Simultaneously, the NRRC works in cooperation with community partners (such asdrug user’s support centres, shelters and street teams) in the management of MDR-TB patients with riskbehaviours [11].

In the Northern Region of Portugal, in addition to the clinical TB notification from the National Tuberculosis Vigilance System (SVIG-TB), the notification of MDR-TB cases is complemented throughlaboratory and pharmaceutical notification. When a multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain is detected, the laboratory notifies the reference centre and the clinician responsible for the patient; the pharmaceutical department notifies the reference centre the request of the second line drugsin healthcare services.

Our study describes and analyses trends and characteristics of M/XDR-TB patients diagnosed in the Northern Region of Portugal during 2003-2014.Throughout, we will then refer exclusively to this geographical area.Data were collected from SVIG-TB. We compared demographic (e.g., age, sex and country of origin) and clinical (e.g., prevalence of HIV, duration of treatment, the occurrence of adverse events and treatment outcome, etc.) characteristics in the period before (2003-2008) and after (2009-2014) the foundation of the NRRC.The treatment outcome was analysed for patients who have initiated treatment between 2003 and 2013(due to the recommended treatment duration - at least 18 months after culture conversion) [12]. The WHO standard definitions were used for both MDR/XDR-TB and treatment outcome(treatment success, died, failed, defaulted and transferred out)[12]. Toxicity during treatment was defined asany serious adverse event involving alteration of the treatment regimen.

During 2003-2014, 85 cases of MDR-TB were diagnosed. Table 1 shows the demographic and clinical characteristics of enrolled patients.The median age of the patients was 42 years-old (IQR 17),58 (68%) patients were male, and 18 (21%) were HIV positive. The median time of treatment was 19 months and 53 (71%) patients successfully completed treatment.

Although thedifferences were not statistically significant, coinfection with HIV (25% vs 14%), alcohol abuse(40% vs 32%) and injection drug use (27 vs 12%) were more prevalent in the first period. Four cases of XDR-TB were diagnosed in this period. The proportion of foreign-born was more prevalent in the second period (22% vs 10%). The prevalence of males and previously treated TB patients was similar in both periods. The treatment success rate was 66% and 77% in the first and second periods, respectively.

In the present study, between 2003 and 2014, a decreasing trend of MDR-TB was observed. This decrease followed the decline of TB in the region, maintaining its proportion at 0.6%. This decrease is consistent with the decrease observed at the national level [6]. Comparing the patients' characteristics in the periods of 2003-2008 and 2009-2014, the patient profile seems to be different within each period, although no significant differences have been identified. A higher prevalence of patients with risk behaviour (alcohol abuse and injection drug) and of younger age is observed within the first period. The prevalence of HIV among MDR-TB patients has also decreased (from 27% to 14%) reflecting the decrease of the HIV incidence and TB/HIV co-infection in Portugal since 2003 [6]. The prevalence of HIV positive TB patients in the period 2003-2014 decreased from 27% to 12% [6].

In our study, the proportion of foreign-born MDR-TB patients in the Northern region was higher in the second period. Nationwide, in this period, a similar trend was observed in MDR-TB, but not in susceptible TB [6]. According to the WHO guidelines, the recommended treatment duration is 18-24 months, determined by culture conversion and disease extension [12]. This recommendation was accomplished in the second period (20 months). It was also during this period that the occurrence of toxicity during treatment was lower (4%). The goal of The Global Plan was to achieve a treatment success rate of at least 75% in MDR-TB patients by 2015 [13]. In Europe and in Portugal, in the 2012 cohort, the treatment success rate was 40% [4] and 77% respectively [5]. Our data showed that the treatment success rate hasincreased from 66% (2003-2008) to 77% (2009-2013). However, we found no association between the factors analysed andasuccessful treatment.

The strength of this study is the completeness of ourdata that, through the triple notification system,allows forthe identification of all MDR-TB cases while the limitations consist of the limited number of factors assessedand lack of statistical power (small number of cases analysed).

In conclusion, in the Northern Region of Portugal, the centralization of MDRTB cases in one expert centre was followed by an improvement of the MDR-TB case management and treatment outcome. We seem to beattending a shift in the patients’ profile, though yet not statistically significant. Patients areno longer essentially young natives with HIV and drug abuse but older and foreigner individuals instead.

Competing Interests

The authors have no competing interests with the work presented in this manuscript.

Author Contributions

Study conception and design: O. Oliveira, R. Duarte
Analysis and interpretation of data: O. Oliveira, A.R. Gaio, R. Duarte
Drafting of manuscript: O. Oliveira, R. Duarte
Critical revision: A.R. Gaio, A. Silva, R. Macedo, R. Duarte


References

  1. World Health Organization. Reaching people with MDR-TB. Progressing in diagnosis: a key step in overcoming the MDR-TB crisis. Geneve, WHO, 2014
  2. World Health Organization. Best practices in prevention, control and care for drug- resistant tuberculosis. Copenhagen, WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2013
  3. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2015. WHO/HTM/ TB/2015.22 Geneva, WHO, 2014
  4. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (2016) Annual Epidemiological Report, 2016 – Tuberculosis. Stockholm: ECDC
  5. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. ECDC special report. Progressing towards TB elimination. A follow-up to the Framework Action Plan to Fight Tuberculosis in the European Union. Stockholm: ECDC; 2016
  6. Direção – Geral da Saúde. Portugal, Infeção VIH/SIDA e Tuberculose emnúmeros-2015. Programa Nacional para a Infeção VIH/SIDA
  7. Direção -Geral da Saúde. SVIG-TB
  8. Gomes C. CRTMR Programa Nacional de Luta Contra a Tuberculose. As recomendações para a gestão da TBMR. DGS/PNT/CRTMR/2008.001. Lisboa, DGS, 2008
  9. Direcção – Geral da Saúde. Centro de Referência para Tuberculose Multirresistente (CRTMR). Circular Informativa nº 14/DT de 05/06/07. Lisboa: DGS, 2007
  10. Administração Regional de Saúde do Norte. Centro de Referencia Regional para a TBMR. ARS Norte, 23 de Abril 2009
  11. Duarte R, Santos A, Mota M, Carvalho A, Marques A, et al. (2011) Involving community partners in the management of tuberculosis among drug users. Public Health 125: 60-62 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. World Health Organization. Guidelines for the programmatic management of drug-resistant tuberculosis. Emergency update, 2008. WHO/HTM/TB/2008.402. Geneva, WHO, 2008 [Google Scholar]
  13. World Health Organization. The global plan to stop TB 2011-2015: transforming the fight towards elimination of tuberculosis. WHO/HTM/STB/2010.2. Geneva, WHO 2010 [Google Scholar]