Profile
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology & Pharmacotherapy Volume 1 (2016), Article ID 1:IJCPP-103, 5 pages
https://doi.org/10.15344/2456-3501/2016/103
Research Article
Evaluation of Concordance Among Different Drug Information Sources Regarding the Recommendations for Dosage Adjustment in Renal Impairment

Kyung Hee Choi1,6, Young-Mi Ah2, Soo-in Sun3, Juyun Kim4, Jinjoo Lee5, Sooyoung Shin3, Ju-Yeun Lee2 and Sukhyang Lee3*

1College of Pharmacy, Sunchon National University, Suncheon, South Korea
2College of Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Hanyang University, Ansan, South Korea
3College of Pharmacy, Ajou University, Suwon, South Korea
4Department of Biomedical Science, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul
5Florida Hospital East Orlando, Orlando, FL
6College of Pharmacy, Chonnam National University, Gwang-Ju, South Korea
Dr. Sukhyang Lee, College of Pharmacy, Ajou University, Woncheon-dong, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon 16499, South Korea; E-mail: suklee@ajou.ac.kr
19 November 2015; 16 February 2016; 18 February 2016
Choi KH, Ah YM, Sun SI, Kim J, Lee J, et al. (2016) Evaluation of Concordance Among Different Drug Information Sources Regarding the Recommendations for Dosage Adjustment in Renal Impairment. Int J Clin Pharmacol Pharmacother 1: 103. doi: https://doi.org/10.15344/2456-3501/2016/103
This study was supported by a grant of the Korea Healthcare R&D Project, the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (Grant No. HI13C0723).

Abstract

Background: It is very important to prescribe appropriate drugs and adjust medication and dosage for optimal disease management not only to maximize patient outcomes, but also to minimize adverse events. So, the accuracy of drug information and consistency among different resources would have a significant effect on drug therapy.
Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the concordance among five drug information sources regarding the recommendations for dosage adjustment in renal impairment.
Methods: The five drug information resources were selected the Korean National Formulary Drug (KNF), the British national formula 2013 (BNF 65), Daily Med in USA, Lexicomp-online, and Drug Prescribing in Renal Failure (DPRF, 5th ed.). After having classified the degrees of renal function and defined the terms used for the dosing methods, we analyzed the concordance in dosing recommendations in renal deficiency among the information sources by calculating Fleiss Kappa.
Results: In the dosing adjustments of patients with renal insufficiency, there were some cases of contraindicated drugs that were not matched in each reference. Statistical analysis of the concordance of four references, except DPRF, and evaluation of 168 of the drugs that were mentioned in all four sources showed the Fleiss Kappa coefficientto be 0.243. This indicatesfair agreement among the data.
Conclusion: Fair agreement was observed among 4 sources. This may be owing to discrepancies in the frequency of updating drug information sources. We suggest that the quantitative standard be used to classify renal function and to maintain consistency in definition of renal impairment.