Table 2: Logistic regression analysis.
OR, Odds ratio; CI, Confidence interval; p, p value; Objective variable, FIM at discharge (0 or 1).
a) Conventional method |
| OR | 95% CI | p |
Age | 0.881 | 0.846-0.932 | 0.000 |
Male 0, female 1 | 0.396 | 0.171-0.915 | 0.030 |
Infarction 0, hemorrhage 1 | 1.603 | 0.639-4.019 | 0.315 |
Number of days from onset to admission | 0.923 | 0.880-0.968 | 0.001 |
Motor FIM score at admission | 1.134 | 1.089-1.181 | 0.000 |
Cognitive FIM score at admission | 1.204 | 1.122-1.293 | 0.000 |
b) New method |
| OR | 95% CI | p |
Age | 0.908 | 0.881-0.937 | 0.000 |
Male 0, female 1 | 0.499 | 0.291-0.856 | 0.012 |
Infarction 0, hemorrhage 1 | 0.838 | 0.462-1.523 | 0.563 |
Number of days from onset to admission | 0.944 | 0.914-0.976 | 0.001 |
Motor FIM score at admission | 0.983 | 0.960-1.006 | 0.149 |
Cognitive FIM score at admission | 0.989 | 0.950-1.029 | 0.588 |