3D Tumor Segmentation in Breast MRIs using 3D Modified Active Contour Method : Table 2

Table 2: Accuracy, specificity, and false alarm rate (%) of the different algorithms in each case.

case type		Methods
case type		ACM	LSM	3D-LSM	3D-MACM
Actual breast MRI	CCR	57.54	97.12	98.07	99.26
	SP	57.73	97.17	98.18	99.45
	FAR	42.27	2.83	1.82	0.75
Simulated case (30% noise density with 3×3 mask blurring)	CCR	90.4	96.84	97.81	99.34
	SP	90.09	96.74	97.77	99.64
	FAR	9.91	3.26	2.23	0.39
Simulated case (40% noise density with 5×5 mask blurring)	CCR	87.97	97.8	98.7	99.08
	SP	87.45	97.78	98.78	99.34
	FAR	12.55	2.22	1.22	0.66
Simulated case (50% noise density with 7×7 mask blurring)	CCR	82.84	97.54	98.81	99.01
	SP	82.23	97.65	99.41	99.27
	FAR	17.77	2.35	0.59	0.73